Display options
Share it on

Sci Adv. 2016 Feb 05;2(2):e1500969. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500969. eCollection 2016 Feb.

Toughness of carbon nanotubes conforms to classic fracture mechanics.

Science advances

Lin Yang, Israel Greenfeld, H Daniel Wagner

Affiliations

  1. Department of Materials and Interfaces, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.

PMID: 26989774 PMCID: PMC4788477 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1500969

Abstract

Defects in crystalline structure are commonly believed to degrade the ideal strength of carbon nanotubes. However, the fracture mechanisms induced by such defects, as well as the validity of solid mechanics theories at the nanoscale, are still under debate. We show that the fracture toughness of single-walled nanotubes (SWNTs) conforms to the classic theory of fracture mechanics, even for the smallest possible vacancy defect (~2 Å). By simulating tension of SWNTs containing common types of defects, we demonstrate how stress concentration at the defect boundary leads to brittle (unstable) fracturing at a relatively low strain, degrading the ideal strength of SWNTs by up to 60%. We find that, owing to the SWNT's truss-like structure, defects at this scale are not sharp and stress concentrations are finite and low. Moreover, stress concentration, a geometric property at the macroscale, is interrelated with the SWNT fracture toughness, a material property. The resulting SWNT fracture toughness is 2.7 MPa m(0.5), typical of moderately brittle materials and applicable also to graphene.

Keywords: CNTF; SWNT; carbon nanotube; carbon nanotube fiber; defect; fracture mechanics; fracture toughness; graphene

References

  1. Nanoscale. 2015 Feb 14;7(6):2716-22 - PubMed
  2. Adv Mater. 2011 May 3;23(17):1971-5 - PubMed
  3. Nanotechnology. 2013 Apr 19;24(15):155702 - PubMed
  4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 18;103(16):6105-9 - PubMed
  5. Nat Nanotechnol. 2008 Oct;3(10):626-31 - PubMed
  6. Sci Rep. 2013;3:2353 - PubMed
  7. Sensors (Basel). 2013 Jul 22;13(7):9388-95 - PubMed
  8. Nano Lett. 2009 Jul;9(7):2730-5 - PubMed
  9. Adv Mater. 2010 Nov 24;22(44):4959-63 - PubMed
  10. ACS Nano. 2013 Oct 22;7(10):8412-22 - PubMed
  11. Nano Lett. 2007 May;7(5):1178-85 - PubMed
  12. J Chem Phys. 2011 May 28;134(20):204708 - PubMed
  13. Science. 2000 Jan 28;287(5453):637-40 - PubMed
  14. Nat Mater. 2006 Jun;5(6):457-62 - PubMed
  15. Science. 2004 Apr 9;304(5668):276-8 - PubMed
  16. Phys Rev B Condens Matter. 1994 Jan 1;49(2):755-764 - PubMed

Publication Types