Display options
Share it on

R Soc Open Sci. 2015 Dec 02;2(12):150450. doi: 10.1098/rsos.150450. eCollection 2015 Dec.

First evidence of hybridization between golden jackal (Canis aureus) and domestic dog (Canis familiaris) as revealed by genetic markers.

Royal Society open science

Ana Galov, Elena Fabbri, Romolo Caniglia, Haidi Arbanasić, Silvana Lapalombella, Tihomir Florijančić, Ivica Bošković, Marco Galaverni, Ettore Randi

Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, Faculty of Science University of Zagreb Rooseveltov trg 6, Zagreb 10000, Croatia.
  2. Laboratorio di Genetica Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale (ISPRA) Ozzano dell'Emilia (BO) 40064, Italy.
  3. Department of Biological Geological and Environmental Sciences University of Bologna Via Selmi 3, Bologna 40126, Italy.
  4. Department for Hunting, Fishery and Beekeeping, Faculty of Agriculture in Osijek Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek Kralja Petra Sva?i?a 1d, Osijek 31000, Croatia.
  5. Laboratorio di GeneticaIstituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale (ISPRA)Ozzano dell'Emilia (BO) 40064, Italy; Department 18/Section of Environmental EngineeringAalborg UniversitySohngårdsholmsvej 57, Aalborg 9000, Denmark.

PMID: 27019731 PMCID: PMC4807452 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.150450

Abstract

Interspecific hybridization is relatively frequent in nature and numerous cases of hybridization between wild canids and domestic dogs have been recorded. However, hybrids between golden jackals (Canis aureus) and other canids have not been described before. In this study, we combined the use of biparental (15 autosomal microsatellites and three major histocompatibility complex (MHC) loci) and uniparental (mtDNA control region and a Y-linked Zfy intron) genetic markers to assess the admixed origin of three wild-living canids showing anomalous phenotypic traits. Results indicated that these canids were hybrids between golden jackals and domestic dogs. One of them was a backcross to jackal and another one was a backcross to dog, confirming that golden jackal-domestic dog hybrids are fertile. The uniparental markers showed that the direction of hybridization, namely females of the wild species hybridizing with male domestic dogs, was common to most cases of canid hybridization. A melanistic 3bp-deletion at the K locus (β-defensin CDB103 gene), that was absent in reference golden jackal samples, but was found in a backcross to jackal with anomalous black coat, suggested its introgression from dogs via hybridization. Moreover, we demonstrated that MHC sequences, although rarely used as markers of hybridization, can be also suitable for the identification of hybrids, as long as haplotypes are exclusive for the parental species.

Keywords: Canis; gene introgression; interspecific hybridization; major histocompatibility complex; melanism; β-defensin CDB103

References

  1. Genetics. 2000 Jun;155(2):945-59 - PubMed
  2. Genetics. 2002 Mar;160(3):1217-29 - PubMed
  3. Tissue Antigens. 2002 Mar;59(3):194-204 - PubMed
  4. Heredity (Edinb). 2003 Jan;90(1):17-24 - PubMed
  5. Genetics. 2003 Aug;164(4):1567-87 - PubMed
  6. Evolution. 2003 Aug;57(8):1707-22 - PubMed
  7. J Evol Biol. 2003 May;16(3):363-77 - PubMed
  8. J Wildl Dis. 2003 Oct;39(4):909-13 - PubMed
  9. Mol Ecol. 2005 Jul;14(8):2611-20 - PubMed
  10. Heredity (Edinb). 2006 Jan;96(1):7-21 - PubMed
  11. J Hered. 2005;96(7):836-42 - PubMed
  12. Biometrics. 1992 Jun;48(2):361-72 - PubMed
  13. Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 May;20(5):229-37 - PubMed
  14. Mol Ecol. 2007 Feb;16(3):629-38 - PubMed
  15. Tissue Antigens. 2007 Apr;69 Suppl 1:272-88 - PubMed
  16. J Hered. 2007;98(5):491-9 - PubMed
  17. Science. 2007 Nov 30;318(5855):1418-23 - PubMed
  18. Mol Ecol. 2008 Jan;17(1):285-93 - PubMed
  19. PLoS Genet. 2008 Aug 29;4(8):e1000168 - PubMed
  20. Mol Ecol Notes. 2007 Jul 1;7(4):574-578 - PubMed
  21. Biochem Genet. 2009 Apr;47(3-4):241-50 - PubMed
  22. BMC Evol Biol. 2009 Feb 05;9:32 - PubMed
  23. Science. 2009 Mar 6;323(5919):1339-43 - PubMed
  24. Evol Bioinform Online. 2007 Feb 23;1:47-50 - PubMed
  25. Mol Ecol. 2009 Aug;18(15):3316-29 - PubMed
  26. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 18;106(33):13903-8 - PubMed
  27. PLoS One. 2011 Jan 26;6(1):e16385 - PubMed
  28. Genome Res. 2011 Aug;21(8):1294-305 - PubMed
  29. Mol Ecol Resour. 2008 Jan;8(1):103-6 - PubMed
  30. Vet J. 2011 Aug;189(2):155-9 - PubMed
  31. Science. 2011 Oct 7;334(6052):89-94 - PubMed
  32. PLoS Genet. 2011 Oct;7(10):e1002316 - PubMed
  33. Mol Ecol. 2011 Dec;20(24):5154-66 - PubMed
  34. Mol Ecol. 2012 Feb;21(4):887-906 - PubMed
  35. Mol Ecol. 2012 Feb;21(4):779-81 - PubMed
  36. Mamm Genome. 2012 Feb;23(1-2):3-18 - PubMed
  37. Ecol Evol. 2012 Jan;2(1):19-33 - PubMed
  38. Bioinformatics. 2012 Oct 1;28(19):2537-9 - PubMed
  39. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42740 - PubMed
  40. Acta Vet Scand. 2012 Sep 24;54:56 - PubMed
  41. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46465 - PubMed
  42. Mamm Genome. 2013 Feb;24(1-2):80-8 - PubMed
  43. Tissue Antigens. 2013 Jan;81(1):19-27 - PubMed
  44. Ecol Evol. 2012 Sep;2(9):2128-40 - PubMed
  45. J Evol Biol. 2013 Feb;26(2):229-46 - PubMed
  46. J Hered. 2013 Sep-Oct;104(5):601-12 - PubMed
  47. Mol Ecol. 2013 Sep;22(18):4606-18 - PubMed
  48. PLoS Genet. 2014 Jan;10(1):e1004016 - PubMed
  49. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 22;9(1):e86409 - PubMed
  50. J Hered. 2015 Jan-Feb;106(1):26-36 - PubMed
  51. Evolution. 1989 Jan;43(1):223-225 - PubMed
  52. Mol Ecol. 1994 Aug;3(4):301-12 - PubMed
  53. Tissue Antigens. 1996 Sep;48(3):199-204 - PubMed
  54. Tissue Antigens. 1996 Nov;48(5):554-61 - PubMed
  55. Mol Biol Evol. 1997 Nov;14(11):1154-66 - PubMed
  56. Tissue Antigens. 1998 Sep;52(3):242-50 - PubMed

Publication Types