Display options
Share it on

Support Care Cancer. 2016 Aug;24(8):3437-45. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3160-z. Epub 2016 Mar 19.

Vulnerable characteristics and interest in wellness programs among head and neck cancer caregivers.

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer

Chandylen L Nightingale, Katherine R Sterba, Janet A Tooze, Brandy-Joe Milliron, Lee Anne Tetrick, Min-So Paek, Kathryn E Weaver

Affiliations

  1. Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy and Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA. [email protected].
  2. Department of Public Health Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 68 President Street MSC 955, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
  3. Department of Biostatistical Sciences and Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA.
  4. Department of Nutrition Sciences, College of Nursing and Health, Drexel University, 1601 Cherry Street, MS 31030, Philadelphia, PA, 19102, USA.
  5. Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy and Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA.

PMID: 26992407 PMCID: PMC4919231 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-016-3160-z

Abstract

PURPOSE: Head and neck cancer (HNC) caregivers have poorer psychological health compared to patients and the general population but have not yet been targeted for wellness programs to reduce adverse psychosocial or physical health outcomes. To inform development of such programs, we identified potential vulnerabilities to poor outcomes and examined wellness program preferences among HNC caregivers. We also examined whether interest in wellness programs varied by potential vulnerabilities among HNC caregivers.

METHODS: Surveys were administered to caregivers (n = 33) of HNC patients undergoing major surgery. Sociodemographic factors, caregiving characteristics, psychosocial functioning, and health behavior data were collected. Fisher's exact tests and t tests were used to examine characteristics associated with interest in the different types of wellness programs.

RESULTS: Many caregivers reported a heavy caregiving load (88 % live with patient and 73 % provide daily care), a smoking history (42 %), and compromised psychosocial functioning (45 % with depressive symptoms and 33 % with anxiety above population norms). Most caregivers were interested in wellness programs focused on diet/exercise (71.9 %); cancer education (66.7 %); stress reduction (63.6 %); and finances, caregiving, and well-being (57.6 %). Caregivers endorsed highest interest in programs offered during the patient's medical treatment (63.6 %), and mail was the preferred program format (50.0 %). Those with more depressive symptoms reported more interest in programs focused on cancer education (p = 0.03); stress reduction (p = 0.05); and educational classes on finances, caregiving, and well-being (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS: Wellness programs offering a menu of options should be developed for HNC caregivers.

Keywords: Cancer; Caregivers; Head and neck cancer; Mental health; Oncology; Wellness programs

References

  1. Head Neck. 2016 May;38(5):700-6 - PubMed
  2. JAMA. 1999 Dec 15;282(23):2215-9 - PubMed
  3. Arch Intern Med. 1999 Aug 9-23;159(15):1701-4 - PubMed
  4. Oral Oncol. 2012 Jan;48(1):18-25 - PubMed
  5. Fam Process. 2004 Jun;43(2):195-208 - PubMed
  6. Support Care Cancer. 2011 Dec;19(12):1949-56 - PubMed
  7. Support Care Cancer. 2014 Jun;22(6):1637-46 - PubMed
  8. Support Care Cancer. 2014 May;22(5):1243-50 - PubMed
  9. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012 Oct;112(10):1570-7 - PubMed
  10. Psychol Aging. 2003 Jun;18(2):250-67 - PubMed
  11. Cancer Nurs. 2009 Nov-Dec;32(6):473-81 - PubMed
  12. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2009 Apr;13(2):128-36 - PubMed
  13. Am J Prev Med. 2003 Feb;24(2):113-9 - PubMed
  14. Psychooncology. 2014 May;23(5):569-77 - PubMed
  15. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2006 Jan;61(1):P33-45 - PubMed
  16. Psychol Aging. 1995 Sep;10(3):447-57 - PubMed
  17. Appl Nurs Res. 2013 Feb;26(1):40-4 - PubMed
  18. J Palliat Care. 2004 Spring;20(1):38-43 - PubMed
  19. Psychosom Med. 1991 Jul-Aug;53(4):345-62 - PubMed
  20. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Apr 10;30(11):1227-34 - PubMed
  21. Psychooncology. 2010 Oct;19(10):1013-25 - PubMed
  22. Cancer. 2015 Jan 15;121(2):302-10 - PubMed
  23. Laryngoscope. 2007 Apr;117(4):712-6 - PubMed
  24. Eur J Public Health. 2002 Sep;12(3):171-6 - PubMed
  25. Psychol Health. 2015;30(11):1288-305 - PubMed
  26. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Feb;20(2):239-48 - PubMed
  27. Gerontologist. 2001 Oct;41(5):652-7 - PubMed
  28. Psychol Aging. 1987 Sep;2(3):225-32 - PubMed
  29. Psychooncology. 2013 Nov;22(11):2399-407 - PubMed
  30. Assessment. 2011 Sep;18(3):263-83 - PubMed
  31. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Aug 1;22(15):2992-6 - PubMed
  32. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Mar 30;55(13):1328-35 - PubMed
  33. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2009 Aug;25(3):222-30 - PubMed
  34. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2015 Aug;4(4):327-38 - PubMed
  35. Support Care Cancer. 2015 May;23(5):1331-9 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types

Grant support