Display options
Share it on

Saudi J Anaesth. 2016 Apr-Jun;10(2):208-12. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.177417.

Knowledge and attitudes of Saudi intensive care unit nurses regarding oral care delivery to mechanically ventilated patients with the effect of healthcare quality accreditation.

Saudi journal of anaesthesia

A K Alotaibi, S K Alotaibi, M Alshayiqi, S Ramalingam

Affiliations

  1. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Prince Sultan Medical Military City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
  2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Prince Sultan Medical Military City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
  3. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
  4. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

PMID: 27051375 PMCID: PMC4799616 DOI: 10.4103/1658-354X.177417

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Ventilator-associated pneumonia is a major morbid outcome among intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Providing oral care for intubated patients is an important task by the ICU nursing staff in reducing the mortality and morbidity. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the attitudes and knowledge of ICU nurses regarding oral care delivery to critically ill patients in Saudi Arabian ICUs. The findings were further correlated to the presence of healthcare quality accreditation of the institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and healthcare quality accreditation status of the hospital were recorded. Two hundred fifteen nurses conveniently selected from 10 random hospitals were included in this study from Riyadh city, Saudi Arabia. This is a cross-sectional study in the form of a questionnaire.

RESULTS: When comparing the knowledge of the participants to their level of education, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups of nurses. The majority of the nurses agreed that the oral cavity is difficult to clean and that oral care delivery is a high priority for mechanically ventilated patients. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference in the attitudes between nurses working in accredited and nonaccredited hospitals.

CONCLUSION: The presence of healthcare quality accreditation did not reflect any significance in attitudes or knowledge of the ICU nurses in regard to mechanically ventilated patients. Factors affecting oral care delivery should be evaluated on the personal and institutional level to achieve better understanding of them.

Keywords: Healthcare quality; intensive care; mechanical ventilation; nursing; oral care hygiene; quality accreditation

References

  1. Intensive Care Med. 2000;26 Suppl 1:S31-7 - PubMed
  2. Intensive Care Med. 2007 Jun;33(6):1066-70 - PubMed
  3. JAMA. 1995 Aug 23-30;274(8):639-44 - PubMed
  4. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2013;26(8):688-702 - PubMed
  5. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 Feb 15;171(4):388-416 - PubMed
  6. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2011 Aug;27(4):180-5 - PubMed
  7. J Clin Nurs. 2010 Nov;19(21-22):3063-72 - PubMed
  8. J Adv Nurs. 2004 Dec;48(5):454-62 - PubMed
  9. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2012 Apr 13;6(4):333-9 - PubMed
  10. Crit Care Med. 1992 Jun;20(6):740-5 - PubMed
  11. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012 Mar;33(3):250-6 - PubMed
  12. Am J Infect Control. 2014 Aug;42(8):921-2 - PubMed
  13. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2011 Dec;155(4):373-8 - PubMed
  14. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2010 Oct-Dec;33(4):339-47 - PubMed
  15. J Clin Nurs. 2011 Mar;20(5-6):733-42 - PubMed
  16. Am J Infect Control. 2004 May;32(3):161-9 - PubMed
  17. Intensive Care Med. 1997 Feb;23(2):187-95 - PubMed

Publication Types