Display options
Share it on

Breast Care (Basel). 2016 Feb;11(1):40-4. doi: 10.1159/000442727. Epub 2015 Dec 21.

Manual Lymphatic Drainage after Subepidermal Tracer Injection Optimizes Results of Sentinel Lymph Node Labeling in Primary Breast Cancer.

Breast care (Basel, Switzerland)

Martin Sillem, Urban Bromberger, Barbara Heitzelmann, Wolfgang J Brauer, Martin Werner, Sylvia Timme

Affiliations

  1. Praxisklinik am Rosengarten, Mannheim, Germany.
  2. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Kreiskrankenhaus Emmendingen, Emmendingen, Germany.
  3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kreiskrankenhaus Emmendingen, Emmendingen, Germany.
  4. Institute of Clinical Pathology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg i.Br., Germany.

PMID: 27051395 PMCID: PMC4813651 DOI: 10.1159/000442727

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to assess the practicability and reliability of a novel labeling regime for axillary sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in early breast cancer.

METHODS: 362 patients with early breast cancer (bilateral in 9 cases, giving a total of 371 cases) underwent intradermal radio tracer injection with simultaneous manual lymphatic drainage. SLN biopsy was performed within 24 h. For retrospective analysis, data were extracted from patient's records.

RESULTS: At least 1 SLN was detected intraoperatively in 369 cases (99.5%, range 1-9 nodes). This node was metastatic in 88 and unaffected in 281 cases. Coincidentally removed but unlabeled lymph nodes were affected in 3 cases in which the SLN was unaffected (3/153 = 2%). In all cases, on histological evaluation, tissue removed as SLN contained lymph nodes. After a period of 69.5 months (median 1.7-115.8 months), no axillary recurrences were observed in 213 patients.

CONCLUSION: Manual lymphatic drainage is a simple technique that leads to an extremely high pick-up rate of axillary SLNs after subepidermal radio tracer injection. If unaffected, this node correctly predicts nodal-negative disease in 98% of cases studied.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Manual lymphatic drainage; Sentinel node

References

  1. Ann Surg Oncol. 2004 Mar;11(3 Suppl):169S-73S - PubMed
  2. Arch Surg. 2004 Jun;139(6):614-8; discussion 618-20 - PubMed
  3. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005 Jan;12(1):29-33 - PubMed
  4. Ann Nucl Med. 2009 Aug;23 (6):507-10 - PubMed
  5. World J Surg Oncol. 2008 Jul 27;6:79 - PubMed
  6. Lancet. 1997 Jun 28;349(9069):1864-7 - PubMed
  7. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Oct 7;101(19):1356-62 - PubMed
  8. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Aug;128(2):366-73 - PubMed
  9. J Breast Cancer. 2011 Dec;14(4):296-300 - PubMed
  10. Ann Oncol. 2013 Sep;24(9):2206-23 - PubMed
  11. J Formos Med Assoc. 2007 Jan;106(1):44-50 - PubMed
  12. Surgery. 2008 Oct;144(4):606-9; discussion 609-10 - PubMed
  13. Radiology. 1989 Feb;170(2):371-4 - PubMed
  14. Breast Cancer. 2007;14(1):16-24 - PubMed
  15. Breast J. 2008 Jan-Feb;14(1):61-7 - PubMed
  16. Z Lymphol. 1989 Jul;13(1):23-31 - PubMed
  17. Ann Surg. 2015 Aug;262(2):243-8 - PubMed
  18. Lymphology. 1983 Mar;16(1):12-8 - PubMed
  19. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Feb;125(3):893-902 - PubMed
  20. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003 Oct;10 (8):942-7 - PubMed
  21. Neurocrit Care. 2009;11(1):88-93 - PubMed
  22. Lymphology. 2004 Jun;37(2):73-91 - PubMed
  23. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Oct 20;23 (30):7703-20 - PubMed
  24. Z Lymphol. 1989 Jul;13(1):62-4 - PubMed

Publication Types