Display options
Share it on

Int J Pept Res Ther. 2016;22:155-161. doi: 10.1007/s10989-015-9494-4. Epub 2015 Sep 28.

Rapid Screening of Antimicrobial Synthetic Peptides.

International journal of peptide research and therapeutics

Maciej Jaskiewicz, Malgorzata Orlowska, Gabriela Olizarowicz, Dorian Migon, Daria Grzywacz, Wojciech Kamysz

Affiliations

  1. Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Gdansk, Al. Gen. J. Hallera 107, 80-416 Gda?sk, Poland.
  2. Lipopharm.pl, ul. Koscielna 16A, 83-210 Zblewo, Poland.

PMID: 27226784 PMCID: PMC4854934 DOI: 10.1007/s10989-015-9494-4

Abstract

Increasing resistance to conventional antibiotics among microorganisms is one of the leading problems of medicine nowadays. Antimicrobial peptides are compounds exhibiting both antibacterial and antifungal activities. However, it is difficult to predict whether a designed new compound would exhibit any biological activity. Moreover, purification of the peptides is one of the most time-consuming and expensive steps of the synthesis that sometimes leads to unnecessary loss of solvents and reagents. In our study we have developed a thin-layer chromatography (TLC) direct bioautography technique for rapid determination of antimicrobial activity of peptides without the necessity of high-performance liquid chromatography purification. In this assay, crude peptides were applied and separated on a TLC plate. Then, pre-prepared plates were dipped into microbial suspension and incubated under optimum conditions for bacteria and fungi as well. The activity of the tested compounds was visualized by spraying the TLC plates with a cell viability reagent, resazurin (7-hydroxy-3H-phenoxazin-3-one 10-oxide). Effectiveness of this assay was compared with minimal inhibitory concentration results obtained by broth microdilution assay. Interestingly, so far such a screening method has not been applied for this group of compounds.

Keywords: Antimicrobial peptides; Direct bioautography; Peptides; TLC; TLC-DB

References

  1. Chromatographia. 2013;76:1327-1332 - PubMed
  2. J Chromatogr A. 2011 May 13;1218(19):2684-91 - PubMed
  3. Curr Med Chem. 2014;21(20):2299-321 - PubMed
  4. Acta Pol Pharm. 2013 Jul-Aug;70(4):611-20 - PubMed
  5. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007 Nov;1768(11):2787-800 - PubMed
  6. FEBS Lett. 2000 Aug 11;479(1-2):6-9 - PubMed
  7. Nature. 1946 Nov 9;158(4019):675 - PubMed
  8. Chem Cent J. 2011 Aug 25;5:49 - PubMed
  9. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2000 May;30(5):379-84 - PubMed
  10. Med Chem. 2012 Jan;8(1):95-101 - PubMed
  11. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009 Aug;1788(8):1680-6 - PubMed
  12. Med Res Rev. 2016 Jan;36(1):4-31 - PubMed
  13. Acta Pol Pharm. 2014 Jan-Feb;71(1):39-47 - PubMed
  14. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2014 May;43(5):395-402 - PubMed
  15. Infect Immun. 1997 Jul;65(7):2898-903 - PubMed
  16. J Ethnopharmacol. 2008 Oct 28;119(3):462-72 - PubMed
  17. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005 Mar;52(3 Pt 1):381-90; quiz 391-2 - PubMed
  18. Amino Acids. 2006 Jun;30(4):351-67 - PubMed
  19. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999 Mar;43(3):702-4 - PubMed
  20. Biopolymers. 2000;55(3):227-50 - PubMed
  21. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006 Sep;1758(9):1408-25 - PubMed
  22. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2004 Jun;8(3):211-21 - PubMed
  23. Biomed Chromatogr. 2014 Jan;28(1):84-101 - PubMed
  24. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2014 Sep;7(9):e11802 - PubMed
  25. Org Lett. 2009 Oct 15;11(20):4488-91 - PubMed
  26. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2006 Aug 4;45(31):5072-129 - PubMed
  27. J Mol Biol. 2014 May 29;426(11):2159-66 - PubMed
  28. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:732078 - PubMed

Publication Types