Display options
Share it on

BMC Obes. 2016 May 06;3:25. doi: 10.1186/s40608-016-0106-4. eCollection 2016.

Neighbourhood socioeconomic context, individual socioeconomic position, and overweight in young children: a multilevel study in a large German city.

BMC obesity

Steffen Andreas Schüle, Rüdiger von Kries, Hermann Fromme, Gabriele Bolte

Affiliations

  1. Department of Social Epidemiology, Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
  2. Institute of Social Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.
  3. Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, Munich, Germany.

PMID: 27195126 PMCID: PMC4859982 DOI: 10.1186/s40608-016-0106-4

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The context of the close neighbourhood environment in which children live has gained increasing attention in epidemiological research. This study aimed to investigate if contextual neighbourhood socioeconomic position (SEP) was independently associated with overweight in young children aged 5-7 years while simultaneously considering a wide range of individual socioeconomic determinants and known risk factors for overweight.

METHODS: Objectively measured body mass index (BMI) data from 3499 children (53 % boys and 47 % girls) from three surveys between 2004 and 2007 clustered in 18 school enrolment zones in the city of Munich, Germany, were analysed with hierarchical logistic regression models. An index of neighbourhood SEP was calculated with principal component analysis using aggregated data. Individual socioeconomic data, maternal BMI, and birth weight were collected with parental questionnaires. We analysed how much of the between neighbourhood variance of overweight was attributable to individual factors and how much was explained by neighbourhood SEP.

RESULTS: The prevalence of overweight, including obesity, was 14.1 %. In the final adjusted model low neighbourhood SEP was independently associated with overweight (odds ratio (OR) = 1.42, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 1.00-2.00) compared to high neighbourhood SEP. On the individual level low parental education (OR = 1.99, 95 % CI = 1.49-2.65) or middle parental education (OR = 1.50, 95 % CI = 1.16-1.95) compared to high parental education and nationality of the child other than German (OR = 1.53, 95 % CI = 1.17-1.99) compared to German nationality were independently associated with overweight.

CONCLUSIONS: Whereas individual determinants were the main drivers in explaining between neighbourhood variance, neighbourhood SEP additionally explained differences in overweight between neighbourhoods. Thus, considering neighbourhood context in intervention planning could result in more effective strategies compared to measures only focusing on individual determinants of overweight.

Keywords: Children; Contextual factors; Hierarchical regression; Multilevel study; Neighbourhood; Overweight; Socioeconomic position

References

  1. Obes Rev. 2004 May;5 Suppl 1:4-104 - PubMed
  2. Int J Biostat. 2010 Apr 22;6(1):Article 16 - PubMed
  3. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47776 - PubMed
  4. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Jan;60(1):7-12 - PubMed
  5. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Nov;92(5):1257-64 - PubMed
  6. Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Dec;113(12):1817-25 - PubMed
  7. BMC Public Health. 2008 Jan 14;8:16 - PubMed
  8. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:103-24 - PubMed
  9. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2007 Apr;50(4):476-83 - PubMed
  10. Eur J Public Health. 2013 Jun;23(3):469-75 - PubMed
  11. BMJ. 2000 May 6;320(7244):1240-3 - PubMed
  12. Can J Public Health. 2005 Nov-Dec;96(6):415-20 - PubMed
  13. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2006 Sep;49(9):853-60 - PubMed
  14. Pediatrics. 1998 Mar;101(3 Pt 2):518-25 - PubMed
  15. Eur J Public Health. 2010 Feb;20(1):14-20 - PubMed
  16. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Jan;83(1):139-45 - PubMed
  17. Health Place. 2014 Sep;29:34-42 - PubMed
  18. CMAJ. 2005 Sep 13;173(6):607-13 - PubMed
  19. Nutr Rev. 2008 Jan;66(1):2-20 - PubMed
  20. Obes Rev. 2009 Jan;10(1):76-86 - PubMed
  21. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2011 Jun;65(6):711-9 - PubMed
  22. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:81-105 - PubMed
  23. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Sep;59(9):729-36 - PubMed
  24. Annu Rev Public Health. 1997;18:341-78 - PubMed
  25. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004 Nov;28(11):1494-502 - PubMed
  26. Lancet. 2014 Aug 30;384(9945):766-81 - PubMed
  27. Psychol Bull. 2013 May;139(3):606-54 - PubMed
  28. Health Place. 2006 Dec;12(4):547-56 - PubMed
  29. Am J Public Health. 1998 Feb;88(2):216-22 - PubMed
  30. Psychol Bull. 2000 Mar;126(2):309-37 - PubMed
  31. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Oct;55(10):693-700 - PubMed
  32. BMC Public Health. 2009 Jan 30;9:43 - PubMed
  33. Soc Sci Med. 2010 Aug;71(3):584-91 - PubMed
  34. Soc Sci Med. 1998 Jan;46(1):97-117 - PubMed
  35. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009 Dec;63(12):1043-8 - PubMed
  36. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Aug;56(8):588-94 - PubMed
  37. Scand J Public Health. 2006;34(5):544-54 - PubMed
  38. Health Place. 2008 Jun;14(2):117-32 - PubMed

Publication Types