Display options
Share it on

F1000Res. 2016 Feb 12;5:167. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.7849.1. eCollection 2016.

Understanding the nature of health: New perspectives for medicine and public health. Improved wellbeing at lower costs.

F1000Research

Johannes Bircher, Eckhart G Hahn

Affiliations

  1. Department of Hepatology, University of Bern, Meikirch, Switzerland.
  2. Department of Medicine 1, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.

PMID: 27134730 PMCID: PMC4837984 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.7849.1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current dilemmas of health care systems call for a new look at the nature of health. This is offered by the Meikirch model. We explore its hypothetical benefit for the future of medicine and public health. Meikirch model: It states: "Health is a dynamic state of wellbeing emergent from conducive interactions between individuals' potentials, life's demands, and social and environmental determinants." "Throughout the life course health results when an individuals' biologically given potential (BGP) and his or her personally acquired potential (PAP), interacting with social and environmental determinants, satisfactorily respond to the demands of life."

METHODS: We explored the Meikirch model's possible applications for personal and public health care.

RESULTS: The PAP of each individual is the most modifiable component of the model. It responds to constructive social interactions and to personal growth. If an individual's PAP is nurtured to develop further, it likely will contribute much more to health than without fostering. It may also compensate for losses of the BGP. An ensuing new culture of health may markedly improve health in the society. The rising costs of health care presumably are due in part to the tragedy of the commons and to moral hazard. Health as a complex adaptive system offers new possibilities for patient care, particularly for general practitioners.

DISCUSSION: Analysis of health systems by the Meikirch model reveals that in many areas more can be done to improve people's health and to reduce health care costs than is done today. The Meikirch model appears promising for individual and public health in low and high income countries. Emphasizing health instead of disease the Meikirch model reinforces article 12 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights of the United Nations - that abandons the WHO definition - and thereby may contribute to its reinterpretation.

Keywords: Definition of health; Meikirch model; health as a complex adaptive system; innovative health policies; potentials for health; responsibility for health; social aspects of health, culture of health, health economy

References

  1. Ann Fam Med. 2014 Jan-Feb;12(1):66-74 - PubMed
  2. Lancet. 2010 Dec 4;376(9756):1923-58 - PubMed
  3. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Aug;83(2):261-70 - PubMed
  4. PLoS Genet. 2014 Aug 28;10(8):e1004601 - PubMed
  5. JAMA. 1997 Nov 19;278(19):1608-12 - PubMed
  6. J Public Health Policy. 2014 Aug;35(3):363-86 - PubMed
  7. Health Expect. 1998 Jun;1(1):3-13 - PubMed
  8. Am J Cardiol. 2004 Feb 1;93(3):294-9 - PubMed
  9. Spinal Cord. 2012 Jul;50(7):521-6 - PubMed
  10. BMJ. 2015 Feb 18;350:h444 - PubMed
  11. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Aug;15(4):766-9 - PubMed
  12. Health Technol Assess. 2012 Aug;16(33):1-236, iii-iv - PubMed
  13. Lancet. 2015 Aug 22;386(9995):743-800 - PubMed
  14. J Public Health Policy. 2014 Aug;35(3):401-6 - PubMed
  15. BMJ. 2011 Jul 26;343:d4163 - PubMed
  16. Med Health Care Philos. 2005;8(3):335-41 - PubMed
  17. Perspect Biol Med. 2010 Summer;53(3):330-40 - PubMed
  18. Soc Sci Med. 2009 Aug;69(3):307-16 - PubMed
  19. Bull World Health Organ. 2004 Feb;82(2):141-9 - PubMed
  20. JAMA. 2013 Feb 20;309(7):665-6 - PubMed
  21. J Public Health Policy. 2014 Aug;35(3):407-10 - PubMed
  22. BMJ. 2008 Dec 10;337:a2900 - PubMed
  23. BMJ. 2012 Jul 31;345:e4933 - PubMed
  24. Diabetes Care. 2015 Jul;38(7):1372-82 - PubMed
  25. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 13;110(33):13684-9 - PubMed
  26. Lancet. 2010 Mar 13;375(9718):916-23 - PubMed
  27. Clin Perinatol. 2011 Dec;38(4):643-55 - PubMed
  28. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2015 Dec 30;9(12):1298-307 - PubMed
  29. J Evid Based Med. 2016 Feb;9(1):8-23 - PubMed
  30. BMJ Open. 2014 Feb 12;4(2):e004180 - PubMed
  31. Lancet. 2012 Sep 15;380(9846):1011-29 - PubMed
  32. Arch Intern Med. 2005 Sep 26;165(17):1946-52 - PubMed
  33. N Engl J Med. 2013 Dec 12;369(24):2347-51 - PubMed
  34. PLoS One. 2013 Sep 09;8(9):e72684 - PubMed
  35. Med Health Care Philos. 2015 May;18(2):245-51 - PubMed
  36. J Public Health Policy. 2014 Aug;35(3):387-91 - PubMed
  37. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 20;23(24):5520-5 - PubMed
  38. Health Policy Plan. 2012 Oct;27 Suppl 4:iv54-61 - PubMed
  39. Int J Health Serv. 1975;5(4):625-642 - PubMed
  40. Health Res Policy Syst. 2015 Nov 06;13:66 - PubMed
  41. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013 Mar;38(3):348-55 - PubMed
  42. J Gerontol. 1972 Jan;27(1):91-4 - PubMed
  43. Perspect Biol Med. 2001 Summer;44(3):353-67 - PubMed
  44. N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 23;363(26):2477-81 - PubMed
  45. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 07;(9):CD008451 - PubMed
  46. N Engl J Med. 2009 Sep 10;361(11):e105 - PubMed
  47. Science. 1968 Dec 13;162(3859):1243-8 - PubMed
  48. Lancet. 2003 Sep 13;362(9387):903-8 - PubMed
  49. Lancet. 2015 Nov 7;386(10006):1861-914 - PubMed
  50. J Public Health Policy. 2014 Aug;35(3):397-400 - PubMed
  51. Brief Funct Genomics. 2012 Nov;11(6):533-42 - PubMed
  52. Arch Intern Med. 2011 Jan 24;171(2):134-40 - PubMed
  53. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 May;80(5):804-13 - PubMed
  54. J Public Health Policy. 2014 Aug;35(3):392-6 - PubMed

Publication Types