Display options
Share it on

J Grad Med Educ. 2016 May;8(2):208-13. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00322.1.

Program Strengths and Opportunities for Improvement Identified by Residents During ACGME Site Visits in 5 Surgical Specialties.

Journal of graduate medical education

Donna A Caniano, Stanley J Hamstra

PMID: 27168889 PMCID: PMC4857511 DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00322.1

Abstract

Background There is limited information about how residents in surgical specialties view program strengths and opportunities for improvement (OFIs). Objective This study aggregated surgical residents' perspectives on program strengths and OFIs to determine whether there was agreement in perspectives among residents in 5 surgical specialties. Methods Resident consensus lists of program strengths and areas for improvement were aggregated from site visits reports during 2012 and 2013 for obstetrics and gynecology, orthopaedic surgery, otolaryngology, plastic surgery, and surgery programs. Four trained individuals coded each strength or OFI in 1 of 3 categories: (1) factors common to all specialties; (2) program or institutional resources; and (3) factors unique to surgical specialties. Themes were classified as most frequent when listed by residents in more than 20% of the programs and less frequent when listed by residents in less than 20% of the programs. Results This study included a total of 359 programs, representing 27% to 49% of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education accredited programs in the 5 specialties. The most frequent strengths were progressive autonomy, collegiality, program leadership, and operative volume. Improving research and didactics, increasing faculty teaching and attendance at educational sessions, and increasing the number of nurse practitioners and physician assistants were common OFIs. Conclusions Factors identified as important by surgical residents related to their learning environment, their educational program, and program and institutional support. Across programs in the study, similar attributes were listed as both program strengths and OFIs.

References

  1. Ann Surg. 2013 Sep;258(3):440-9 - PubMed
  2. Am J Med Qual. 2011 Nov-Dec;26(6):452-60 - PubMed
  3. J Grad Med Educ. 2014 Sep;6(3):612-4 - PubMed
  4. J Grad Med Educ. 2012 Mar;4(1):122-7 - PubMed
  5. J Grad Med Educ. 2016 May;8(2):291-6 - PubMed
  6. J Grad Med Educ. 2015 Mar;7(1):21-6 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types