Display options
Share it on

Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2016 Jun;7(2):81-5. doi: 10.1177/2151458516645633. Epub 2016 May 02.

Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Clinical Pathway for Elderly Patients With Hip Fracture: A Multicenter Comparative Cohort Study.

Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation

P H S Kalmet, B B Koc, B Hemmes, R H M Ten Broeke, G Dekkers, P Hustinx, M G Schotanus, P Tilman, H M J Janzing, J M A Verkeyn, P R G Brink, M Poeze

Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery and Trauma Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard Geleen, the Netherlands.
  3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  4. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Laurentius Hospital, Roermond, the Netherlands.
  5. Department of Surgery and Trauma Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, the Netherlands.
  6. Department of Surgery and Trauma Surgery, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, the Netherlands.
  7. Department of Surgery and Trauma Surgery, St Jans Gasthuis, Weert, the Netherlands.

PMID: 27239381 PMCID: PMC4872184 DOI: 10.1177/2151458516645633

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The use of a multidisciplinary clinical pathway (MCP) for patients with hip fracture tends to be more effective than usual care (UC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of an MCP approach on time to surgery, length of stay, postoperative complications, and 30-day mortality, compared to UC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included patients aged 50 years or older with a proximal hip fracture who underwent surgery in one of the 6 hospitals in the Limburg trauma region of the Netherlands in 2012. Data such as demographics, process outcome measures, and clinical outcome were collected.

RESULTS: This study included a total of 1193 patients (665 and 528 patients in the MCP and UC groups, respectively). There were no differences in patient demographics present. Time to surgery was significantly shorter in the MCP compared to the UC group (19.2 vs 24.4 hours, P < .01). The mean length of stay was 10 versus 12 days (P < .01). In the MCP group, significantly lower rates of postoperative complications were observed and significantly more patients were institutionalized than in the UC group. Mortality within 30 days after admission was comparable between the groups (overall mortality 6%).

CONCLUSION: An MCP approach is associated with reduced time to surgery, postoperative complications, and length of stay, without a significant difference in 30-day mortality. The institutionalization rate was significantly higher in the MCP group.

Keywords: hip fracture; length of stay; mortality; multidisciplinary clinical pathway; time to surgery

References

  1. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2015 Sep;6(3):209-14 - PubMed
  2. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2012 Jun;3(2):59-67 - PubMed
  3. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2015 Dec;6(4):258-62 - PubMed
  4. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Jan;90(1):34-42 - PubMed
  5. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2011 Jun;47(2):281-96 - PubMed
  6. Aust Health Rev. 2005 Feb;29(1):94-104 - PubMed
  7. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Dec 19;8:265 - PubMed
  8. BMJ. 2000 Sep 16;321(7262):694-6 - PubMed
  9. J Orthop Traumatol. 2013 Sep;14 (3):165-70 - PubMed
  10. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Mar 14;(8):ED000023 - PubMed
  11. J Nurs Manag. 2006 Oct;14 (7):553-63 - PubMed
  12. Int Orthop. 2014 May;38(5):1045-50 - PubMed
  13. G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2008 Feb;9(2):118-25 - PubMed
  14. J Trauma. 2010 Jan;68(1):153-8 - PubMed
  15. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2006 Nov 25;150(47):2599-604 - PubMed
  16. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 May 30;15:188 - PubMed
  17. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 Mar;48(3):283-8 - PubMed
  18. Osteoporos Int. 2010 Dec;21(Suppl 4):S627-36 - PubMed
  19. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Sep;134(9):1261-9 - PubMed
  20. BMJ. 2007 Mar 3;334(7591):455-9 - PubMed
  21. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2012 Nov;73(11):645-8 - PubMed
  22. Orthopedics. 2014 Feb;37(2):e194-200 - PubMed
  23. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2013 Oct;23(7):737-45 - PubMed
  24. Ir Med J. 2010 Sep;103(8):246-8 - PubMed
  25. Injury. 2012 Jun;43(6):676-85 - PubMed
  26. Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Nov;14(11):1114-9 - PubMed
  27. Unfallchirurg. 2013 Oct;116(10):909-15 - PubMed

Publication Types