Display options
Share it on

J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2016 Jun;7(3):275-83. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12065. Epub 2015 Oct 15.

Accelerometer-determined physical activity, muscle mass, and leg strength in community-dwelling older adults.

Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle

Yi Chao Foong, Nabil Chherawala, Dawn Aitken, David Scott, Tania Winzenberg, Graeme Jones

Affiliations

  1. Menzies Institute for Medical Research University of Tasmania Private Bag 23 Hobart Tasmania 7000 Australia; North West Regional Hospital Burnie Tasmania 7250 Australia.
  2. Menzies Institute for Medical Research University of Tasmania Private Bag 23 Hobart Tasmania 7000 Australia.
  3. Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences Monash University Clayton Victoria 3146 Australia; NorthWest Academic Centre The University of Melbourne St Albans Victoria 3021 Australia.
  4. Menzies Institute for Medical Research University of Tasmania Private Bag 23 Hobart Tasmania 7000 Australia; Faculty of Health University of Tasmania Hobart Tasmania 7000 Australia.

PMID: 27239404 PMCID: PMC4863829 DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.12065

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to describe the relationship between accelerometer-determined physical activity (PA), muscle mass, and lower-limb strength in community-dwelling older adults.

METHODS: Six hundred thirty-six community-dwelling older adults (66 ± 7 years) were studied. Muscle mass was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, whilst lower limb strength was measured via dynamometry. We measured minutes/day spent in sedentary, light, moderate, and vigorous intensity activity using Actigraph GT1M accelerometers.

RESULTS: Participants spent a median of 583(Interquartile ratio (IQR) 522-646), 225(176-271), 27(12-45) and 0(0-0) min in sedentary, light, moderate, and vigorous activity, respectively. PA intensity was positively associated with both lean mass percentage and lower limb strength in a dose-response fashion. Sedentary activity was negatively associated with lean mass percentage, but not lower-limb strength. There was a positive association between PA and appendicular lean mass in men only. There was an interaction between age and activity; as age increased, the magnitude of the association of PA with lean mass percentage decreased. Those who adhered to the Australian Department of Health PA guidelines (moderate/vigorous PA >/=150 min/week) had greater lean mass percentage, appendicular lean mass, and lower limb strength.

CONCLUSIONS: Using accelerometer technology, both the amount and intensity of accelerometer-determined PA had an independent, dose-response relationship with lean mass percentage and lower limb strength, with the largest effect for vigorous activity. Time spent in sedentary activity was negatively associated with lean mass percentage, but was not associated with lower limb strength. The magnitude of the association between PA and lean mass percentage decreased with age, suggesting that PA programmes may need to be modified with increasing age.

Keywords: Accelerometer; Muscle mass; Physical activity; Strength

References

  1. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2009 May;15(3):438-50 - PubMed
  2. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2014 May-Jun;58(3):308-13 - PubMed
  3. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Nov;61(11):1887-93 - PubMed
  4. Age Ageing. 2004 Nov;33(6):548-55 - PubMed
  5. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2010 Nov;73(5):581-7 - PubMed
  6. PLoS Med. 2015 Feb 17;12(2):e1001783 - PubMed
  7. J Bone Miner Res. 2009 Dec;24(12):2007-15 - PubMed
  8. Age Ageing. 2012 Nov;41(6):799-803 - PubMed
  9. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2012 Dec;24(6):657-62 - PubMed
  10. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Feb;41(2):383-9 - PubMed
  11. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Nov;51(11):1602-9 - PubMed
  12. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Nov;58(11):2055-62 - PubMed
  13. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 Apr;48(4):381-6 - PubMed
  14. BMC Geriatr. 2014 Oct 27;14:114 - PubMed
  15. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000 Dec;55(12):M716-24 - PubMed
  16. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Feb;100(2):670-8 - PubMed
  17. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2012 Jan;67(1):66-73 - PubMed
  18. Exp Gerontol. 2014 Jul;55:107-12 - PubMed
  19. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Jan;52(1):80-5 - PubMed
  20. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 Nov;37(11 Suppl):S512-22 - PubMed
  21. Maturitas. 2014 Jun;78(2):106-12 - PubMed
  22. J Aging Phys Act. 2015 Jul;23(3):339-45 - PubMed
  23. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2001 Jan;24(3):343-52 - PubMed
  24. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006 Jan;61(1):72-7 - PubMed
  25. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995 Nov;50 Spec No:64-7 - PubMed
  26. Arthritis Res Ther. 2014 Jul 14;16(4):R149 - PubMed
  27. Sports Med. 2002;32(12):795-808 - PubMed
  28. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002 Dec;57(12):M772-7 - PubMed
  29. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Nov;59(11):2062-8 - PubMed
  30. BMC Public Health. 2014 Apr 19;14:382 - PubMed
  31. Clin Sci (Lond). 1988 Jan;74(1):85-9 - PubMed
  32. J Phys Act Health. 2013 Aug;10(6):769-76 - PubMed
  33. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998 May;30(5):777-81 - PubMed
  34. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011 Dec;21(6):e168-75 - PubMed
  35. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Jan;16(1):85.e1-8 - PubMed
  36. J Physiol Anthropol. 2010;29(6):211-8 - PubMed
  37. Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Oct 15;180(8):830-7 - PubMed
  38. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2016 Jun;7(3):275-83 - PubMed
  39. Age Ageing. 2015 May;44(3):384-90 - PubMed
  40. Osteoporos Int. 2015 Feb;26(2):571-9 - PubMed
  41. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010 Jul;109(5):953-61 - PubMed
  42. N Engl J Med. 1994 Jun 23;330(25):1769-75 - PubMed
  43. Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E26 - PubMed
  44. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Aug 15;16(8):e192 - PubMed

Publication Types