J Curr Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan 05;27(3):115-24. doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2015.11.002. eCollection 2015.
Higher order aberrations in a normal adult population.
Journal of current ophthalmology
Hassan Hashemi, Mehdi Khabazkhoob, Ebrahim Jafarzadehpur, Abbasali Yekta, Mohammad Hassan Emamian, Mohammad Shariati, Akbar Fotouhi
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Noor Research Center for Ophthalmic Epidemiology, Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran.
- Noor Research Center for Ophthalmic Epidemiology, Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran; Noor Ophthalmology Research Center, Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran.
- Department of Optometry, School of Paramedical Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
- Center for Health Related Social and Behavioral Sciences Research, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.
- Department of Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
PMID: 27239589
PMCID: PMC4881154 DOI: 10.1016/j.joco.2015.11.002
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the distribution of Zernike coefficients and higher order aberrations in a normal population and its relationship with age, gender, biometric components, and spherical equivalent.
METHODS: During the first phase of the Shahroud cohort study, 6311 people of the 40-64-year-old population of Shahroud city were selected through random cluster sampling. A subsample of participants was examined with Zywave aberrometer (The Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY) to measure aberrations. Measurements of aberrations were done before cycloplegic refraction, and values generated from a minimum pupil diameter of 5 mm were reported in this analysis.
RESULTS: After applying exclusion criteria, 904 eyes of 577 people were analyzed in this study and mean age in this study was 49.5 ± 5.7 years and 62.9% were female. Mean root-mean-square (RMS) of the third-, fourth-, and fifth-order aberrations was 0.194 μm (95%CI: 0.183 to 0.204), 0.115 μm (95%CI: 0.109 to 0.121), and 0.041 μm (95%CI: 0.039 to 0.043), respectively. Total RMS coma (Z3 (-1,) Z3 (1), Z5 (-1), Z5 (1)), Total RMS trefoil (Z3 (-3,) Z3 (3), Z5 (-3), Z5 (3)), and spherical aberration (Z4 (0)) in the studied population was 0.137 μm (95% CI:0.129-0.145), 0.132 μm (95% CI: 0.123-0.140), and -0.161 μm (95%CI:-0.174 to -0.147), respectively. Mean higher-order Zernike RMS in this study was 0.306 (95% CI: 0.295-0.318) micrometer, and in the multiple model, it significantly correlated with older age and short axial length. The highest amounts of higher-order RMS were observed in hyperopes, and the smallest in emmetropes. Increased nuclear opacity was associated with a significant increase in HO RMS (p < 0.001). Analysis of Zernike coefficients demonstrated that spherical aberration (Z4 (0)) significantly correlated with nuclear cataract only (age-adjusted Coef = 0.37 and p = 0.012).
CONCLUSION: This report is the first to describe the distribution of higher-order aberrations in an Iranian population. Higher-order aberrations in this study were on average higher that those reported in previous studies.
Keywords: Adult; Higher order aberrations; Population based study; Zernike coefficients
References
- J Refract Surg. 2003 May-Jun;19(3):316-22 - PubMed
- Vision Res. 2002 Apr;42(8):1063-70 - PubMed
- Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2009 Jul;29(4):436-42 - PubMed
- Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010 Apr;38(3):242-8 - PubMed
- J Refract Surg. 2010 Jan;26(1):45-51 - PubMed
- Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2005 Jul;25(4):285-301 - PubMed
- Indian J Ophthalmol. 2010 Jul-Aug;58(4):307-12 - PubMed
- Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2008 Nov;28(6):532-7 - PubMed
- J Refract Surg. 2006 Sep;22(7):695-702 - PubMed
- Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Dec;44(12):5438-46 - PubMed
- J Refract Surg. 2009 Jul;25(7):559-68 - PubMed
- Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010 Nov;30(6):800-5 - PubMed
- Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2012 Jan;32(1):25-30 - PubMed
- Clin Ophthalmol. 2011;5:1701-7 - PubMed
- Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Oct;42(5):1300-8 - PubMed
- Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 Mar;91(3):287-92 - PubMed
- J Refract Surg. 2010 May;26(5):333-40 - PubMed
- Neurology. 2000 Feb 8;54(3):653-9 - PubMed
- Cornea. 2009 May;28(4):395-400 - PubMed
- J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Aug;30(8):1642-8 - PubMed
- J Refract Surg. 2006 Nov;22(9 Suppl):S1024-6 - PubMed
- J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Aug;33(8):1442-6 - PubMed
- Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Jan;141(1):67-70 - PubMed
- J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002 Dec;28(12):2135-41 - PubMed
- J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1999 Sep;16(9):2069-78 - PubMed
- J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Feb;36(2):215-21 - PubMed
- J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Dec;32(12):2064-74 - PubMed
- Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jan;16(1):9-14 - PubMed
- Optometry. 2005 Aug;76(8):461-72 - PubMed
- Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Jun;137(6):988-92 - PubMed
- Rev Med Liege. 2003 Mar;58(3):119-22 - PubMed
- Optom Vis Sci. 2003 Feb;80(2):159-66 - PubMed
- PLoS Med. 2012;9(10):e1001321 - PubMed
- Vision Res. 2006 Oct;46(21):3707-22 - PubMed
- J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Aug;34(8):1306-11 - PubMed
- Strabismus. 2010 Sep;18(3):104-10 - PubMed
- Opt Express. 2001 May 21;8(11):631-43 - PubMed
- J Vis. 2004 Apr 22;4(4):288-98 - PubMed
- Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2009 May;29(3):288-91 - PubMed
- Cornea. 2010 Jan;29(1):9-12 - PubMed
- J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Nov;33(11):1918-24 - PubMed
- J Refract Surg. 2005 Jul-Aug;21(4):332-8 - PubMed
- Eye (Lond). 2008 Dec;22(12):1493-8 - PubMed
- Clin Exp Optom. 2012 Jul;95(4):399-403 - PubMed
- Curr Eye Res. 2009 May;34(5):378-85 - PubMed
- Braz J Med Biol Res. 2002 Nov;35(11):1395-406 - PubMed
- J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Dec;35(12):2144-8 - PubMed
- J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Oct;29(10):1896-903 - PubMed
- Ophthalmology. 2006 Oct;113(10):1807-12 - PubMed
- Optom Vis Sci. 2012 Jul;89(7):993-9 - PubMed
Publication Types