Display options
Share it on

Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2016 May 19;7:37-48. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S98686. eCollection 2016.

Eye Care Quality and Accessibility Improvement in the Community (EQUALITY): impact of an eye health education program on patient knowledge about glaucoma and attitudes about eye care.

Patient related outcome measures

Lindsay A Rhodes, Carrie E Huisingh, Gerald McGwin, Stephen T Mennemeyer, Mary Bregantini, Nita Patel, Jinan Saaddine, John E Crews, Christopher A Girkin, Cynthia Owsley

Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  2. Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  3. Department of Health Care Organization and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  4. Prevent Blindness, Chicago, IL, USA.
  5. Vision Health Initiative, Divisi of Diabetes Translation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

PMID: 27274329 PMCID: PMC4877018 DOI: 10.2147/PROM.S98686

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of the education program of the Eye Care Quality and Accessibility Improvement in the Community (EQUALITY) telemedicine program on at-risk patients' knowledge about glaucoma and attitudes about eye care as well as to assess patient satisfaction with EQUALITY.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: New or existing patients presenting for a comprehensive eye exam (CEE) at one of two retail-based primary eye clinics were enrolled based on ≥1 of the following at-risk criteria for glaucoma: African Americans ≥40 years of age, Whites ≥50 years of age, diabetes, family history of glaucoma, and/or preexisting diagnosis of glaucoma. A total of 651 patients were enrolled. A questionnaire was administered prior to the patients' CEE and prior to the patients receiving any of the evidence-based eye health education program; a follow-up questionnaire was administered 2-4 weeks later by phone. Baseline and follow-up patient responses regarding knowledge about glaucoma and attitudes about eye care were compared using McNemar's test. Logistic regression models were used to assess the association of patient-level characteristics with improvement in knowledge and attitudes. Overall patient satisfaction was summarized.

RESULTS: At follow-up, all patient responses in the knowledge and attitude domains significantly improved from baseline (P≤0.01 for all questions). Those who were unemployed (odds ratio =0.63, 95% confidence interval =0.42-0.95, P=0.026) or had lower education (odds ratio =0.55, 95% confidence interval =0.29-1.02, P=0.058) were less likely to improve their knowledge after adjusting for age, sex, race, and prior glaucoma diagnosis. This association was attenuated after further adjustment for other patient-level characteristics. Ninety-eight percent (n=501) of patients reported being likely to have a CEE within the next 2 years, whereas 63% (n=326) had a CEE in the previous 2 years. Patient satisfaction with EQUALITY was high (99%).

CONCLUSION: Improved knowledge about glaucoma and a high intent to pursue eye care may lead to improved detection of early disease, thus lowering the risk of blindness.

Keywords: blindness prevention; patient satisfaction; patient-related outcome; telemedicine

References

  1. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 May;48(5):1989-94 - PubMed
  2. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2013 Apr-Jun;20(2):150-7 - PubMed
  3. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 May;131(5):651-8 - PubMed
  4. Ophthalmology. 1982 Sep;89(9):991-8 - PubMed
  5. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002 Oct;86(10):1080-4 - PubMed
  6. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001 Jul;119(7):1050-8 - PubMed
  7. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Aug;142(2):223-6 - PubMed
  8. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000 Jun;118(6):819-25 - PubMed
  9. JAMA. 2002 Aug 21;288(7):841-9 - PubMed
  10. Am J Epidemiol. 1980 Jun;111(6):759-68 - PubMed
  11. Clin Exp Optom. 2013 Nov;96(6):577-80 - PubMed
  12. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008 May;126(5):718-24 - PubMed
  13. JAMA. 1991 Jul 17;266(3):369-74 - PubMed
  14. Can J Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb;50(1):19-25 - PubMed
  15. Ophthalmology. 2016 Jan;123(1):P41-P111 - PubMed
  16. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014 Mar 17;8(2):262-266 - PubMed
  17. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014 Apr 25;8:565-74 - PubMed
  18. J Telemed Telecare. 2003;9(5):296-9 - PubMed
  19. Med Care Res Rev. 2006 Apr;63(2):217-35 - PubMed
  20. J Telemed Telecare. 2004;10(6):331-6 - PubMed
  21. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2013 Apr-Jun;20(2):142-9 - PubMed
  22. Ann Ophthalmol. 1985 Oct;17(10):653-9 - PubMed
  23. J Natl Med Assoc. 2008 Sep;100(9):1089-95 - PubMed
  24. Ophthalmology. 2010 Feb;117(2):207-15.e1 - PubMed
  25. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr 24;9:745-9 - PubMed
  26. J Natl Med Assoc. 2013 Spring;105(1):69-76 - PubMed
  27. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1998 Jun;5(2):91-100 - PubMed
  28. Curr Eye Res. 2016;41(1):50-8 - PubMed
  29. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001 Jan;119(1):89-95 - PubMed
  30. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008 Jan;2(1):33-9 - PubMed
  31. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994 Jun;112(6):821-9 - PubMed
  32. Ophthalmology. 2000 Feb;107(2):303-8 - PubMed
  33. Can J Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr;49(2):135-40 - PubMed
  34. Ophthalmology. 1999 May;106(5):904-9 - PubMed
  35. JAMA. 2002 Jul 24-31;288(4):475-82 - PubMed
  36. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001 Dec;119(12):1819-26 - PubMed
  37. Ophthalmology. 2008 Jan;115(1):85-93 - PubMed
  38. Int J Equity Health. 2015 Nov 18;14:135 - PubMed
  39. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Dec;98 (12 ):1605-11 - PubMed
  40. Patient Educ Couns. 2012 May;87(2):160-4 - PubMed
  41. Telemed J. 1999 Fall;5(3):283-90 - PubMed
  42. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014 Feb;132(2):162-7 - PubMed
  43. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30;(4):CD006132 - PubMed
  44. Ann Ophthalmol. 1978 Oct;10(10):1398-1402 - PubMed
  45. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2008 Sep;83(9):533-8 - PubMed
  46. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Feb;54(2):166-71 - PubMed
  47. Am J Ophthalmol. 1985 Apr 15;99(4):383-7 - PubMed
  48. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2006 Feb;84(1):84-91 - PubMed
  49. Br J Ophthalmol. 1978 Oct;62(10):676-8 - PubMed
  50. J Telemed Telecare. 2012 Oct;18(7):367-73 - PubMed
  51. PLoS One. 2014 Aug 19;9(8):e102972 - PubMed
  52. N Engl J Med. 1991 Nov 14;325(20):1418-22 - PubMed
  53. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004 Apr;122(4):532-8 - PubMed
  54. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Jul;47(7):2797-802 - PubMed
  55. Afr J Med Med Sci. 2003 Dec;32(4):371-6 - PubMed
  56. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003 Feb;135(2):194-205 - PubMed
  57. J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Feb;20(2):175-84 - PubMed
  58. J Glaucoma. 1999 Dec;8(6):367-73 - PubMed
  59. Am J Public Health. 1999 Dec;89(12):1878-82 - PubMed
  60. N Engl J Med. 1991 Nov 14;325(20):1412-7 - PubMed
  61. J Glaucoma. 1997 Jun;6(3):146-51 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support