Display options
Share it on

Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2015 Mar 15;3(1):46-51. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2015.035. Epub 2015 Mar 08.

Some Adverse Effects of Used Engine Oil (Common Waste Pollutant) On Reproduction of Male Sprague Dawley Rats.

Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences

Wasiu Olalekan Akintunde, Ojo A Olugbenga, Ogundipe O Olufemi

Affiliations

  1. Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, P.M.B. 4000, Ogbomoso, Nigeria.
  2. Department of Crop and Environmental Protection, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, P.M.B. 4000 Ogbomoso, Nigeria.
  3. Department of Physiology, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, P.M.B. 4000, Ogbomoso, Nigeria.

PMID: 27275195 PMCID: PMC4877787 DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2015.035

Abstract

AIM: Used oil is contaminated not only with heavy metals but also with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) that are insignificant in the unused oil. In our study we determined possible reproductive effects of used engine oil on male rats.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty eight male Wistar rats were used for the study. The rats had average weight of 181.5 ± 10 g, animal feeds and portable water was provided ad-libitum. The rats were assigned to 4 groups (n = 7) including control. The treated groups orally received 0.1 ml/rat, 0.2 ml/rat and 0.4 ml/rat of the used engine oil every other day for 28 days using oral canulla. The spermatozoa were collected from epididymis for sperm analysis and testes were removed and preserved in Bouin's fluid for routine histological analysis.

RESULTS: Our results showed that there was progressive weight increase among the control group of rats that received distilled water. Meanwhile, rats that received 0.4 ml/rat of the used engine oil showed significant (P < 0.05) weight loss in second and third week of administration while rats that received 0.2 ml/rat and 0.1 ml/rat of the used engine oil showed non-significant (P > 0.05) weight reduction. The spermatozoa number was decreased with significance (P < 0.05) at 0.2 ml/rat (2.38 ± 0.29) and 0.4 ml/rat (1.98 ± 0.08) when compared with the control (5.00 ± 0.89). However, the percentage of motile sperms was reduced significantly (P <0.05) at 0.2 ml/rat (52.86 ± 3.59) and 0.4 ml/rat (45.71 ± 2.94) except at 0.1 ml/rat where the reduction (64.00 ± 7.5) was not significant (P> 0.05). The percentage of head deformity been 41.43 ± 2.61 and 42.00 ± 3.74 at 0.2 ml/rat and 0.4 ml/rat respectively, also significant increase of middle piece deformity was observed only at 0.1 ml/rat (45.71 ± 2.02) while tail deformity significantly decreased (15.71 ± 2.02, 20.00 ± 4.36 and 20.00 ± 4.47) when compared with the control (30.00 ± 1.29). The testicular seminiferous tubules were slightly degenerated with absence of Lumen. The germinal cell layer consisting of necrosis of spermatogonia and interstitial (Leydig) cells with affected Sertoli cells at different maturation stages.

CONCLUSION: Hence, it can be said that there is a negative relation between used engine oil and male reproductive parameters. And it can be concluded that used engine oil should be prevented from leaking, spilling or improperly discarded as through medium it may enter storm water runoff and eventually affect the environmental health receiving water bodies.

Keywords: Rats’; Sperm parameters; Testes; Used Engine Oil

References

  1. Reprod Toxicol. 2004 May;18(3):439-42 - PubMed
  2. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1983 Jan;12(1):31-5 - PubMed
  3. Clin Toxicol. 1973;6(3):367-76 - PubMed
  4. Vet Hum Toxicol. 1989 Feb;31(1):29-33 - PubMed
  5. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1998 Apr;149(2):159-66 - PubMed
  6. Can Vet J. 1976 Jan;17(1):16-8 - PubMed
  7. Environ Pollut. 1988;49(2):89-97 - PubMed
  8. Hum Exp Toxicol. 1996 May;15(5):406-10 - PubMed
  9. Urology. 1979 Mar;13(3):280-1 - PubMed
  10. Histochemistry. 1978 Feb 3;55(1):27-40 - PubMed
  11. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2013 Oct;59(5):251-5 - PubMed
  12. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1982 Apr;63(2):230-41 - PubMed
  13. Environ Health Perspect. 1993 Oct;101(5):378-84 - PubMed
  14. Environ Sci Technol. 2004 Jan 15;38(2):353-8 - PubMed
  15. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1984 Jan;13(1):15-27 - PubMed

Publication Types