Display options
Share it on

Int J Ophthalmol. 2016 May 18;9(5):717-20. doi: 10.18240/IJO.2016.05.14. eCollection 2016.

Axial length in unilateral idiopathic central serous chorioretinopathy.

International journal of ophthalmology

Hoseok Moon, Dae Yeong Lee, Dong Heun Nam

Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Gachon University Gil Hospital, Incheon 405-760, Korea.

PMID: 27275428 PMCID: PMC4886871 DOI: 10.18240/IJO.2016.05.14

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the axial length (AXL) in unilateral idiopathic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC).

METHODS: This retrospective case-control study was comprised of a consecutive case series of 35 patients with acute unilateral idiopathic CSC, and age- and sex-matched 50 control eyes. AXL of both eyes of unilateral CSC patients and the control eyes were investigated. AXL was measured by ultrasonic biometry, and the adjusted AXL was calculated for CSC eyes as measured AXL plus differences of foveal thickness between CSC and normal fellow eyes in millimeters. The main outcome measures were comparison of AXL between CSC, fellow and control eyes.

RESULTS: The mean age of 35 CSC patients was 45.5y, and 31 males were included. The adjusted AXL of CSC eyes was 23.52 mm, and the AXL of fellow eyes was 23.46 mm, and of control eyes 23.94 mm. The AXL of both CSC and fellow eyes were significantly shorter than control eyes (CSC vs control, P=0.044; fellow vs control, P=0.026). There was no statistically significant difference in AXL between CSC and fellow eyes.

CONCLUSION: In unilateral idiopathic CSC, the AXL of CSC and fellow eyes are shorter than that of control eyes. Short AXL may be related with choroidal circulation abnormality in CSC.

Keywords: axial length; central serous chorioretinopathy; choroidal circulation; pathophysiology

References

  1. Eye (Lond). 2013 Mar;27(3):387-91 - PubMed
  2. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994 Aug;112(8):1057-62 - PubMed
  3. Ophthalmology. 1996 Dec;103(12):2070-9; discussion 2079-80 - PubMed
  4. Int Ophthalmol. 1995;19(2):77-82 - PubMed
  5. Retina. 2011 Oct;31(9):1904-11 - PubMed
  6. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 May 01;54(5):3644-9 - PubMed
  7. Int Ophthalmol. 2014 Feb;34(1):7-13 - PubMed
  8. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 1997 Jan;101(1):74-82 - PubMed
  9. Retina. 1994;14(3):231-42 - PubMed
  10. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993 Jan;115(1):50-6 - PubMed
  11. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Jan;51(1):103-9 - PubMed
  12. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 Mar;149(3):361-363 - PubMed
  13. Retina. 2011 Sep;31(8):1603-8 - PubMed
  14. Retina. 1999;19(6):508-12 - PubMed
  15. Eye (Lond). 2011 Dec;25(12):1635-40 - PubMed
  16. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Mar;41(2):201-14 - PubMed
  17. Retina. 2009 Nov-Dec;29(10):1469-73 - PubMed
  18. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Oct 31;52(11):8438-41 - PubMed
  19. Int Ophthalmol. 1997;21(2):57-69 - PubMed
  20. Retina. 1996;16(3):203-13 - PubMed
  21. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Aug 22;52(9):6636-42 - PubMed
  22. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001 Jan;42(1):73-80 - PubMed

Publication Types