Display options
Share it on

J Med Ultrason (2001). 2003 Sep;30(3):171. doi: 10.1007/BF02481222.

Comparison of sonographic triplet fetal growth measurements between Japanese and American populations.

Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001)

Masashi Akiyama, Atsushi Kuno, Masazi Utsu, Toshiyuki Hata

Affiliations

  1. Department of Perinatology and Gynecology Kagawa Medical University, 1750-1 Ikenobe, Miki, 761-0793, Kagawa, Japan.
  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Seirei Mikatabara Hospital, 3453 Mikatabara, Hamamatsu, 433-8558, Shizuoka, Japan.

PMID: 27278307 DOI: 10.1007/BF02481222

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate changes in several triplet fetal growth parameters associated with gestational age by means of a longitudinal study designed to compare ethnic differences in fetal growth in Japanese and American populations.

SUBJECTS: Twenty-one Japanese triplet fetuses (7 triplet pregnancies) and 21 American triplet fetuses (7 triplet pregnancies). The Japanese pregnancies were in middle-class Japanese women living in the Kagawa area; the American pregnancies, in middle-class white women living in the Houston area.

METHODS: Head circumference, abdominal circumference, femur length, and estimated weight were measured every 2 to 3 weeks from 15 weeks of gestational age until delivery. Values for each parameter at each gestational age were measured in each fetal group, and the data of the groups were compared.

RESULTS: Head circumference, abdominal circumference, femur length, and estimated weight were significantly lower in the Japanese than in the American triplet fetuses after 20 weeks of gestation (p<0.01).

CONCLUSION: These results suggest that triplet fetal growth in Japanese populations and American populations differs significantly in the second half of pregnancy.

Keywords: ethnic difference; fetal growth; triplet pregnancy; ultrasound

References

  1. J Clin Ultrasound. 1991 Nov-Dec;19(9):541-5 - PubMed
  2. Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Mar;75(3 Pt 1):324-8 - PubMed
  3. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1978 Jul;85(7):481-6 - PubMed
  4. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1984 Oct;91(10):968-72 - PubMed
  5. J Perinat Med. 1995;23(4):257-63 - PubMed
  6. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Nov;6(5):345-8 - PubMed
  7. Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Apr;59(4):472-6 - PubMed
  8. Lancet. 1992 Feb 1;339(8788):283-7 - PubMed
  9. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Aug;6(2):73-4 - PubMed
  10. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Nov;157(5):1140-5 - PubMed
  11. Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Apr;57(4):458-63 - PubMed
  12. J Hum Nutr. 1981 Dec;35(6):415-30 - PubMed
  13. JAMA. 1986 Jan 3;255(1):48-52 - PubMed
  14. Arch Dis Child. 1982 Nov;57(11):867-71 - PubMed
  15. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995 May;5(5):313-7 - PubMed
  16. Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Mar;77(3):387-93 - PubMed
  17. Hum Reprod Update. 1998 Mar-Apr;4(2):177-83 - PubMed
  18. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982 Nov;89(11):896-9 - PubMed
  19. Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Jun;93(6):943-7 - PubMed
  20. Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Sep;70(3 Pt 1):344-8 - PubMed
  21. J Clin Ultrasound. 1981 Nov-Dec;9(9):481-93 - PubMed
  22. Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1982 Mar;34(3):315-20 - PubMed
  23. Semin Perinatol. 1986 Jan;10(1):19-29 - PubMed
  24. Arch Dis Child. 1985 Sep;60(9):868-70 - PubMed
  25. Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1983 Dec;35(12):2330-8 - PubMed
  26. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 May;178(5):916-21 - PubMed
  27. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1981 Mar;88(3):260-3 - PubMed
  28. Radiology. 1984 Aug;152(2):497-501 - PubMed
  29. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Jan;164(1 Pt 1):135-40 - PubMed

Publication Types