J Med Ultrason (2001). 2003 Sep;30(3):171. doi: 10.1007/BF02481222.
Comparison of sonographic triplet fetal growth measurements between Japanese and American populations.
Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001)
Masashi Akiyama, Atsushi Kuno, Masazi Utsu, Toshiyuki Hata
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Perinatology and Gynecology Kagawa Medical University, 1750-1 Ikenobe, Miki, 761-0793, Kagawa, Japan.
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Seirei Mikatabara Hospital, 3453 Mikatabara, Hamamatsu, 433-8558, Shizuoka, Japan.
PMID: 27278307
DOI: 10.1007/BF02481222
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate changes in several triplet fetal growth parameters associated with gestational age by means of a longitudinal study designed to compare ethnic differences in fetal growth in Japanese and American populations.
SUBJECTS: Twenty-one Japanese triplet fetuses (7 triplet pregnancies) and 21 American triplet fetuses (7 triplet pregnancies). The Japanese pregnancies were in middle-class Japanese women living in the Kagawa area; the American pregnancies, in middle-class white women living in the Houston area.
METHODS: Head circumference, abdominal circumference, femur length, and estimated weight were measured every 2 to 3 weeks from 15 weeks of gestational age until delivery. Values for each parameter at each gestational age were measured in each fetal group, and the data of the groups were compared.
RESULTS: Head circumference, abdominal circumference, femur length, and estimated weight were significantly lower in the Japanese than in the American triplet fetuses after 20 weeks of gestation (p<0.01).
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that triplet fetal growth in Japanese populations and American populations differs significantly in the second half of pregnancy.
Keywords: ethnic difference; fetal growth; triplet pregnancy; ultrasound
References
- J Clin Ultrasound. 1991 Nov-Dec;19(9):541-5 - PubMed
- Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Mar;75(3 Pt 1):324-8 - PubMed
- Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1978 Jul;85(7):481-6 - PubMed
- Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1984 Oct;91(10):968-72 - PubMed
- J Perinat Med. 1995;23(4):257-63 - PubMed
- Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Nov;6(5):345-8 - PubMed
- Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Apr;59(4):472-6 - PubMed
- Lancet. 1992 Feb 1;339(8788):283-7 - PubMed
- Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Aug;6(2):73-4 - PubMed
- Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Nov;157(5):1140-5 - PubMed
- Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Apr;57(4):458-63 - PubMed
- J Hum Nutr. 1981 Dec;35(6):415-30 - PubMed
- JAMA. 1986 Jan 3;255(1):48-52 - PubMed
- Arch Dis Child. 1982 Nov;57(11):867-71 - PubMed
- Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995 May;5(5):313-7 - PubMed
- Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Mar;77(3):387-93 - PubMed
- Hum Reprod Update. 1998 Mar-Apr;4(2):177-83 - PubMed
- Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982 Nov;89(11):896-9 - PubMed
- Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Jun;93(6):943-7 - PubMed
- Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Sep;70(3 Pt 1):344-8 - PubMed
- J Clin Ultrasound. 1981 Nov-Dec;9(9):481-93 - PubMed
- Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1982 Mar;34(3):315-20 - PubMed
- Semin Perinatol. 1986 Jan;10(1):19-29 - PubMed
- Arch Dis Child. 1985 Sep;60(9):868-70 - PubMed
- Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1983 Dec;35(12):2330-8 - PubMed
- Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 May;178(5):916-21 - PubMed
- Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1981 Mar;88(3):260-3 - PubMed
- Radiology. 1984 Aug;152(2):497-501 - PubMed
- Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Jan;164(1 Pt 1):135-40 - PubMed
Publication Types