Display options
Share it on

J Med Ultrason (2001). 2011 Jan;38(1):41-5. doi: 10.1007/s10396-010-0287-2. Epub 2010 Oct 30.

A case of vasa previa diagnosed prenatally, and review of the literature.

Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001)

Atsushi Komatsu, Shiro Kozuma, Shiro Yoshida, Hironobu Hyodo, Takahiro Yamashita, Yoshimasa Kamei, Tomoyuki Fujii, Yuji Taketani

Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan. [email protected].
  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.

PMID: 27278338 DOI: 10.1007/s10396-010-0287-2

Abstract

The perinatal mortality rate of vasa previa is high if it is not prenatally diagnosed. In this report, a case of vasa previa diagnosed prenatally is presented. Antepartum hemorrhage at 24 weeks of gestation prompted a close investigation of the uterine cervix, internal os, and placenta. We detected a low-lying bilobed placenta with umbilical cord insertion in the lower uterine segment. Furthermore, one of the connecting vessels of the bilobed placenta passed directly above the internal os. Vasa previa was suspected and confirmed with color Doppler and MRI. The fetus was delivered uneventfully by planned Cesarean section at 38 weeks of gestation. It should be considered that placenta previa (including low-lying placenta), bilobed placenta, and umbilical cord insertion in the lower uterine segment are associated with high risk of vasa previa. Ultrasound screening for cord insertion and placenta around the internal os enables efficient and certain detection of vasa previa.

Keywords: Lobed placenta; Transvaginal ultrasound; Vasa previa

References

  1. J Matern Fetal Med. 2000 Nov-Dec;9(6):370-2 - PubMed
  2. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996 Mar;103(3):284-6 - PubMed
  3. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 May;103(5 Pt 1):937-42 - PubMed
  4. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Dec;12 (6):426-9 - PubMed
  5. Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Dec;56(6):737-42 - PubMed
  6. Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Oct;82(4 Pt 2 Suppl):698-700 - PubMed
  7. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1991 Apr 16;39(2):147-50 - PubMed
  8. Clin Haematol. 1978 Feb;7(1):19-34 - PubMed
  9. J Reprod Med. 2003 Oct;48(10 ):771-4 - PubMed
  10. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jun;21(6):564-9 - PubMed
  11. Fertil Steril. 2002 Sep;78(3):642-3 - PubMed
  12. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jan;7(1):61-3 - PubMed
  13. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1993;22(2):184-90 - PubMed
  14. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998 Jul;79(1):19-25 - PubMed
  15. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1997 Aug;52(8):515-23 - PubMed
  16. BJOG. 2003 Dec;110(12):1127-8 - PubMed
  17. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1999 Feb;54(2):138-45 - PubMed
  18. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1984 Jun;22(3):207-11 - PubMed
  19. Prenat Diagn. 2007 Jul;27(7):595-9 - PubMed
  20. Obstet Gynecol. 1989 May;73(5 Pt 2):866-7 - PubMed
  21. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010 Jan;108(1):85-9 - PubMed
  22. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987 Feb;27(1):68-9 - PubMed
  23. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2003 Nov-Dec;16(6):543-8 - PubMed
  24. J Ultrasound Med. 2004 Nov;23 (11):1521-2 - PubMed
  25. J Ultrasound Med. 2005 May;24(5):721-4; quiz 725 - PubMed
  26. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007 Mar;14(3):372-4 - PubMed
  27. Br Med J. 1952 Dec 6;2(4796):1243 - PubMed
  28. Bristol Med Chir J. 1988 May;103(2):12 - PubMed
  29. Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Apr;95(4):572-6 - PubMed

Publication Types