Display options
Cite
Takada E, Kudo N, Endoh N, et al. Transmission electron microscopy study on the effects of the ultrasound contrast agent Levovist on hepatic cells. J Med Ultrason (2001). 2012;39(3):107-13doi: 10.1007/s10396-012-0349-8.
Takada, E., Kudo, N., Endoh, N., Hachiya, H., Takeuchi, S., Tsuchiya, T., & Natori, M. (2012). Transmission electron microscopy study on the effects of the ultrasound contrast agent Levovist on hepatic cells. Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 39(3), 107-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-012-0349-8
Takada, Etsuo, et al. "Transmission electron microscopy study on the effects of the ultrasound contrast agent Levovist on hepatic cells." Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) vol. 39,3 (2012): 107-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-012-0349-8
Takada E, Kudo N, Endoh N, Hachiya H, Takeuchi S, Tsuchiya T, Natori M. Transmission electron microscopy study on the effects of the ultrasound contrast agent Levovist on hepatic cells. J Med Ultrason (2001). 2012 Jul;39(3):107-13. doi: 10.1007/s10396-012-0349-8. Epub 2012 Apr 05. PMID: 27278970.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

J Med Ultrason (2001). 2012 Jul;39(3):107-13. doi: 10.1007/s10396-012-0349-8. Epub 2012 Apr 05.

Transmission electron microscopy study on the effects of the ultrasound contrast agent Levovist on hepatic cells.

Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001)

Etsuo Takada, Nobuki Kudo, Nobuyuki Endoh, Hiroyuki Hachiya, Shin-Ichi Takeuchi, Takenobu Tsuchiya, Michiya Natori

Affiliations

  1. Center of Medical Ultrasonics, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, 880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu, Tochigi, 321-0293, Japan. [email protected].
  2. Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering, Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
  3. Department of Electronics and Informatics Frontiers, Faculty of Engineering, Kanagawa University, Yokohama, Japan.
  4. Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan.
  5. Department of Clinical Engineering, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Toin University of Yokohama, Yokohama, Japan.
  6. Research Institute, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.

PMID: 27278970 DOI: 10.1007/s10396-012-0349-8

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Ultrasound Equipment and Safety Committee of The Japan Society of Ultrasonics in Medicine performed experiments to confirm whether contrast-enhanced ultrasonography damages liver cells.

METHODS: Rats were injected with 0.1 ml of 300 mg/ml ultrasound contrast agent (UCA). Diagnostic ultrasound pulses with a center frequency of 6 MHz and a mechanical index of 1.9 were applied to rat livers with a water bag as a coupler to maintain a distance of 2-6 cm between the ultrasound probe surface and the liver. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was carried out for 10 s to visualize the entire liver. Then, specimens of liver tissue were fixed using two types of fixation: immersion and perfusion fixation.

RESULTS: Although some variations were found in electron micrographs of liver tissue fixed using immersion fixation, none of three blinded readers found any significant differences between micrographs of liver tissue from rats receiving UCA with sonication and those from sham-treated control rats. Changes observed were not thought to be group-specific but instead due to differences between individual rats. When the livers were fixed using perfusion fixation and the hepatic vein was cut after injection of physiological saline for perfusion, a large number of vacuoles ≥2 μm in diameter were observed. This finding suggested that hepatic cell damage observed in this study was caused by high perfusion pressure during the liver fixation process rather than by sonication with UCA.

CONCLUSION: Blinded readings of electron micrographs showed no clear evidence that the use of Levovist in ADI mode ultrasonography causes significant damage to liver tissue.

Keywords: Liver damage; Microbubble; Ultrasonic contrast agent

References

  1. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1996;22(9):1131-54 - PubMed
  2. J Ultrasound Med. 2004 Jan;23 (1):29-36 - PubMed
  3. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2000 Apr;13(4):288-94 - PubMed
  4. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1998;24 Suppl 1:S11-21 - PubMed
  5. J Ultrasound Med. 2005 Jul;24(7):967-74 - PubMed
  6. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2006 Jan;32(1):115-29 - PubMed
  7. J Ultrasound Med. 2003 Apr;22(4):365-73 - PubMed
  8. J Ultrasound Med. 2002 Dec;21(12):1347-56; discussion 1343-45 - PubMed

Publication Types