Display options
Share it on

Front Psychol. 2016 Apr 14;7:500. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00500. eCollection 2016.

Testing Relations of Crystallized and Fluid Intelligence and the Incremental Predictive Validity of Conscientiousness and Its Facets on Career Success in a Small Sample of German and Swiss Workers.

Frontiers in psychology

Priska Hagmann-von Arx, Jasmin T Gygi, Rebekka Weidmann, Alexander Grob

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Basel Basel, Switzerland.

PMID: 27148112 PMCID: PMC4830819 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00500

Abstract

This study examined the relation of fluid and crystallized intelligence with extrinsic (occupational skill level, income) and intrinsic (job satisfaction) career success as well as the incremental predictive validity of conscientiousness and its facets. Participants (N = 121) completed the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales (RIAS), the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R), and reported their occupational skill level, income, and job satisfaction. Results revealed that crystallized intelligence was positively related to occupational skill level, but not to income. The association of crystallized intelligence and job satisfaction was negative and stronger for the lowest occupational skill level, whereas it was non-significant for higher levels. Fluid intelligence showed no association with career success. Beyond intelligence, conscientiousness and its facet self-discipline were associated with income, whereas conscientiousness and its facets competence and achievement striving were associated with job satisfaction. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for the assessment process as well as for future research to adequately predict career success.

Keywords: career success; conscientiousness; income; intelligence; job satisfaction; occupational skill level

References

  1. J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903 - PubMed
  2. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Nov;93(5):880-96 - PubMed
  3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Sep 21;107(38):16489-93 - PubMed
  4. J Pers Assess. 1995 Feb;64(1):21-50 - PubMed
  5. J Appl Psychol. 2013 Nov;98(6):875-925 - PubMed
  6. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014 Mar;9(2):211-8 - PubMed
  7. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014 Sep;9(5):538-51 - PubMed
  8. J Appl Psychol. 2002 Jun;87(3):530-41 - PubMed
  9. J Appl Psychol. 2000 Dec;85(6):869-79 - PubMed
  10. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Jan;86(1):162-73 - PubMed
  11. J Educ Psychol. 1966 Oct;57(5):253-70 - PubMed
  12. J Appl Psychol. 2006 Jan;91(1):40-57 - PubMed
  13. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91 - PubMed

Publication Types