Display options
Share it on

Front Vet Sci. 2016 Apr 14;3:31. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2016.00031. eCollection 2016.

Wild and Domestic Pig Interactions at the Wildlife-Livestock Interface of Murchison Falls National Park, Uganda, and the Potential Association with African Swine Fever Outbreaks.

Frontiers in veterinary science

Esther A Kukielka, Ferran Jori, Beatriz Martínez-López, Erika Chenais, Charles Masembe, David Chavernac, Karl Ståhl

Affiliations

  1. Center for Animal Disease Modeling and Surveillance (CADMS), VM: Medicine & Epidemiology, University of California Davis , Davis, CA , USA.
  2. Integrated Animal Risk Management (AGIRs), CIRAD Campus International de Baillarguet, Montpellier, France; Department of Animal Science and Production, Botswana University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Gaborone, Botswana.
  3. Department of Disease Control and Epidemiology, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Biomedical Sciences and Veterinary Public Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Science (SLU), Uppsala, Sweden.
  4. Department of Biological Sciences, Makerere University , Kampala , Uganda.
  5. Control of Exotic and Emerging Animal Diseases (CMAEE), CIRAD Campus International de Baillarguet , Montpellier , France.

PMID: 27148545 PMCID: PMC4831202 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2016.00031

Abstract

Bushpigs (BPs) (Potamochoerus larvatus) and warthogs (WHs) (Phacochoerus africanus), which are widely distributed in Eastern Africa, are likely to cohabitate in the same environment with domestic pigs (DPs), facilitating the transmission of shared pathogens. However, potential interactions between BP, WH, and DP, and the resulting potential circulation of infectious diseases have rarely been investigated in Africa to date. In order to understand the dynamics of such interactions and the potential influence of human behavior and husbandry practices on them, individual interviews (n = 233) and participatory rural appraisals (n = 11) were carried out among Ugandan pig farmers at the edge of Murchison Falls National Park, northern Uganda. In addition, as an example of possible implications of wild and DP interactions, non-linear multivariate analysis (multiple correspondence analyses) was used to investigate the potential association between the aforementioned factors (interactions and human behavior and practices) and farmer reported African swine fever (ASF) outbreaks. No direct interactions between wild pigs (WPs) and DP were reported in our study area. However, indirect interactions were described by 83 (35.6%) of the participants and were identified to be more common at water sources during the dry season. Equally, eight (3.4%) farmers declared exposing their DP to raw hunting leftovers of WPs. The exploratory analysis performed suggested possible associations between the farmer reported ASF outbreaks and indirect interactions, free-range housing systems, dry season, and having a WH burrow less than 3 km from the household. Our study was useful to gather local knowledge and to identify knowledge gaps about potential interactions between wild and DP in this area. This information could be useful to facilitate the design of future observational studies to better understand the potential transmission of pathogens between wild and DPs.

Keywords: African swine fever; Uganda; bushpig; interactions; interface; warthog

References

  1. Anim Health Res Rev. 2011 Jun;12(1):95-111 - PubMed
  2. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2011 Jun;58(3):247-54 - PubMed
  3. PLoS One. 2015 Jan 28;10(1):e0116059 - PubMed
  4. Prev Vet Med. 2013 Jun 1;110(2):274-9 - PubMed
  5. Front Vet Sci. 2015 Oct 28;2:51 - PubMed
  6. BMC Vet Res. 2013 Mar 07;9:46 - PubMed
  7. Vet Res. 2014 Dec 12;45:122 - PubMed
  8. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2016 Feb;63(1):e58-70 - PubMed
  9. Ecohealth. 2009 Jun;6(2):296-310 - PubMed
  10. Afr Health Sci. 2014 Dec;14(4):1036-45 - PubMed
  11. Prev Vet Med. 2011 Jul 1;100(3-4):210-20 - PubMed
  12. PLoS One. 2015 May 04;10(5):e0125842 - PubMed
  13. Vet Pathol. 2010 Jan;47(1):34-9 - PubMed
  14. Vet Rec. 1969 Dec 13;85(24):668-74 - PubMed
  15. Science. 2010 Feb 12;327(5967):812-8 - PubMed
  16. BMC Vet Res. 2015 May 13;11:106 - PubMed
  17. Am J Vet Res. 2011 Jul;72(7):924-31 - PubMed
  18. Vet Microbiol. 1998 Apr 30;62(1):1-15 - PubMed
  19. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013 May;36(3):295-302 - PubMed
  20. Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Jul;112(10):1092-8 - PubMed
  21. Prev Vet Med. 2013 Nov 1;112(3-4):213-21 - PubMed
  22. Virus Res. 2013 Apr;173(1):191-7 - PubMed
  23. J Nutr. 2003 Nov;133(11 Suppl 2):3907S-3910S - PubMed
  24. Virol J. 2012 Sep 11;9:192 - PubMed
  25. Vet J. 2012 Feb;191(2):151-60 - PubMed
  26. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jun;63(6):638-46 - PubMed
  27. J Aging Res. 2013;2013:302163 - PubMed
  28. Virus Res. 2013 Apr;173(1):212-27 - PubMed
  29. J Environ Manage. 2006 Jul;80(2):156-66 - PubMed
  30. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 1985 Sep;52(3):201-9 - PubMed
  31. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017 Feb;64(1):101-115 - PubMed
  32. Nature. 2008 Feb 21;451(7181):990-3 - PubMed
  33. Vet Microbiol. 2009 Feb 2;133(4):335-43 - PubMed
  34. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2016 Oct;63(5):e360-8 - PubMed
  35. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Nov 22;11:155 - PubMed
  36. Prev Vet Med. 2013 Jun 1;110(2):198-205 - PubMed
  37. Vet Res. 2007 May-Jun;38(3):451-64 - PubMed
  38. Virus Res. 2013 Apr;173(1):228-46 - PubMed

Publication Types