Soc Sci Med. 2016 Jun;159:127-31. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.05.012. Epub 2016 May 07.
Social science & medicine (1982)
Maria A Carrasco, Usama Bilal
PMID: 27180257 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.05.012
Among various social factors associated with health behavior and disease, social cohesion has not captured the imagination of public health researchers as much as social capital as evidenced by the subsuming of social cohesion into social capital and the numerous studies analyzing social capital and the comparatively fewer articles analyzing social cohesion and health. In this paper we provide a brief overview of the evolution of the conceptualization of social capital and social cohesion and we use philosopher Erich Fromm's distinction between "having" and "being" to understand the current research focus on capital over cohesion. We argue that social capital is related to having while social cohesion is related to being and that an emphasis on social capital leads to individualizing tendencies that are antithetical to cohesion. We provide examples drawn from the literature where this conflation of social capital and cohesion results in non-concordant definitions and subsequent operationalization of these constructs. Beyond semantics, the practical implication of focusing on "having" vs. "being" include an emphasis on understanding how to normalize groups and populations rather than providing those groups space for empowerment and agency leading to health.
Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Keywords: Empowerment; Social capital; Social cohesion; Social factors
