J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016 Jun;7(3):387-94. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2015.12.02.
Determining the optimal number of lymph nodes harvested during esophagectomy.
Journal of gastrointestinal oncology
Khaldoun Almhanna, Jill Weber, Ravi Shridhar, Sarah Hoffe, Jonathan Strosberg, Kenneth Meredith
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida 334612, USA.
PMID: 27284471
PMCID: PMC4880760 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2015.12.02
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We examined the impact of the number of lymph nodes (LNs) removed during esophagectomy on outcomes in esophageal cancer (EC).
METHODS: From a comprehensive EC database we identified patients who underwent curative resection from 1994 to 2011. The impact of total LNs retrieved on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was investigated.
RESULTS: In total, 635 patients were identified. Patients were divided on the basis of total number of LNs removed (<8, 9-12, 13-20, and >20). The 5-year OS and DFS rates for the group by LN category were (43%, 42%, 55%, and 36%, P=0.1836) and (44%, 37%, 46%, and 36%, P=0.5166), respectively. Total number of LNs assessed did not correlate with reduced risk of recurrence or improved survival. On multivariate analysis controlling for age, sex, histology, neoadjuvant therapy, only removal of 13-20 LN's correlated to improved oncologic outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: In a tertiary cancer center, we demonstrated that only removal of 13-20 LNs during esophagectomy correlated to improved survival. While the importance of standardized pathologic examination and adequate nodal staging is of utmost importance for patients with EC undergoing esophagectomy the optimum number of LNs removed clearly warrants further investigation.
Keywords: Esophagectomy; lymph nodes (LN); neoadjuvant therapy
References
- Cancer. 2008 Mar 15;112(6):1239-46 - PubMed
- Ann Surg. 2010 Jan;251(1):46-50 - PubMed
- Recent Results Cancer Res. 2000;155:123-33 - PubMed
- Br J Surg. 2001 May;88(5):715-9 - PubMed
- CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 Sep-Oct;60(5):277-300 - PubMed
- J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Feb;11(2):158-65 - PubMed
- Br J Surg. 2002 Jul;89(7):909-13 - PubMed
- J Surg Oncol. 2011 Apr;103(5):416-20 - PubMed
- J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83 - PubMed
- N Engl J Med. 2002 Nov 21;347(21):1662-9 - PubMed
- Am J Surg. 2005 Jan;189(1):98-109 - PubMed
- Am J Surg. 1998 Jan;175(1):47-51 - PubMed
- J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Nov;11(11):1384-93; discussion 1393-4 - PubMed
- Br J Surg. 2000 Oct;87(10):1426-33 - PubMed
- J Thorac Oncol. 2010 May;5(5):707-12 - PubMed
- N Engl J Med. 2003 Nov 27;349(22):2117-27 - PubMed
- Ann Surg Oncol. 2006 Sep;13(9):1189-200 - PubMed
- Ann Surg. 2002 Aug;236(2):177-83 - PubMed
- Ann Surg. 2008 Oct;248(4):549-56 - PubMed
- J Clin Oncol. 2005 Oct 1;23(28):7114-24 - PubMed
Publication Types