Display options
Cite
Karakas MS, Korucuk N, Tosun V, et al. Red cell distribution width and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predict left ventricular dysfunction in acute anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2015;28(3):152-8doi: 10.1016/j.jsha.2015.07.001.
Karakas, M. S., Korucuk, N., Tosun, V., Altekin, R. E., Koç, F., Ozbek, S. C., Ozel, D., & Ermis, C. (2016). Red cell distribution width and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predict left ventricular dysfunction in acute anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Journal of the Saudi Heart Association, 28(3), 152-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsha.2015.07.001
Karakas, Mustafa Serkan, et al. "Red cell distribution width and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predict left ventricular dysfunction in acute anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction." Journal of the Saudi Heart Association vol. 28,3 (2016): 152-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsha.2015.07.001
Karakas MS, Korucuk N, Tosun V, Altekin RE, Koç F, Ozbek SC, Ozel D, Ermis C. Red cell distribution width and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predict left ventricular dysfunction in acute anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2016 Jul;28(3):152-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsha.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Jul 14. PMID: 27358532; PMCID: PMC4917641.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2016 Jul;28(3):152-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsha.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Jul 14.

Red cell distribution width and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predict left ventricular dysfunction in acute anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Journal of the Saudi Heart Association

Mustafa Serkan Karakas, Necmettin Korucuk, Veysel Tosun, Refik Emre Altekin, Fatih Koç, Sinan Cemgil Ozbek, Deniz Ozel, Cengiz Ermis

Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiology, Akdeniz University Medical Faculty, Dumlupinar Bouleward, Konyaalt?, Antalya, Turkey.
  2. Department of Cardiology, Ahi Evran University Education and Research Hospital, K?r?ehir, Turkey.
  3. Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Akdeniz University Medical Faculty, Dumlupinar Bouleward, Konyaalt?, Antalya, Turkey.

PMID: 27358532 PMCID: PMC4917641 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsha.2015.07.001

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Red cell distribution width (RDW) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) are the two markers used to determine risk of mortality and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction. The relationship between RDW, NLR, and left ventricular (LV) systolic functions has not been reported. In this report, we aimed to investigate the relationship between RDW, NLR, and LV systolic function in anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS: RDW and NLR were measured on admission in 106 STEMI patients treated with primary PCI. Patients were divided into two groups according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), as Group I (systolic dysfunction, LVEF <50%) and Group II (preserved global left ventricle systolic function, LVEF ⩾50%). The first group included 47 patients and the second group included 59 patients.

RESULTS: Mean RDW and NLR were significantly higher in Group I compared to Group II [13.7 ± 0.9% vs. 13.4 ± 0.7%, p = 0.03 and 5.86 (range, 0.66-40.50) vs. 2.75 (range, 0.51-39.39), p = 0.013, respectively].

CONCLUSION: Increased RDW and NLR on admission, in anterior STEMI patients treated with primary PCI are associated with LV systolic dysfunction.

Keywords: Myocardial infarction; Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; Primary percutaneous coronary intervention; Red cell distribution width; Systolic dysfunction

References

  1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 May 17;45(10):1638-43 - PubMed
  2. Eur Heart J. 2007 Aug;28(15):1805-13 - PubMed
  3. Am J Cardiol. 2010 Oct 1;106(7):988-93 - PubMed
  4. Circulation. 1984 Feb;69(2):250-8 - PubMed
  5. Atherosclerosis. 2012 Sep;224(1):143-9 - PubMed
  6. Am Heart J. 1994 May;127(5):1226-30 - PubMed
  7. Heart. 2003 Oct;89(10):1200-4 - PubMed
  8. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2015 Apr;26(3):274-8 - PubMed
  9. Scand J Immunol. 1981;13(6):573-9 - PubMed
  10. Arch Intern Med. 2009 Mar 23;169(6):588-94 - PubMed
  11. Int J Cardiol. 2011 Jan 21;146(2):278-80 - PubMed
  12. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2014 Nov;20(8):819-24 - PubMed
  13. Am Heart J. 2010 Dec;160(6 Suppl):S11-5 - PubMed
  14. N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):1011-23 - PubMed
  15. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Apr 18;47(8 Suppl):C19-31 - PubMed
  16. Arch Intern Med. 1988 Apr;148(4):822-4 - PubMed
  17. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005 Dec;18(12 ):1440-63 - PubMed
  18. Intern Med. 2011;50(24):2941-5 - PubMed
  19. Coron Artery Dis. 2011 May;22(3):138-44 - PubMed
  20. Chin Med J (Engl). 2010 Dec;123(23):3438-43 - PubMed
  21. Lancet. 2006 May 27;367(9524):1747-57 - PubMed
  22. J Surg Oncol. 2005 Sep 1;91(3):181-4 - PubMed
  23. Am J Cardiol. 2012 Sep 1;110(5):621-7 - PubMed
  24. Am J Cardiol. 2010 Feb 1;105(3):312-7 - PubMed
  25. Circulation. 2002 Mar 5;105(9):1135-43 - PubMed
  26. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2015 May;21(4):383-8 - PubMed
  27. Angiology. 2013 Nov;64(8):592-6 - PubMed
  28. Am J Cardiol. 2008 Mar 15;101(6):747-52 - PubMed
  29. Nature. 2002 Dec 19-26;420(6917):868-74 - PubMed
  30. Clin Nutr. 2010 Oct;29(5):600-4 - PubMed
  31. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Jul 3;50(1):40-7 - PubMed
  32. Circulation. 2008 Jan 15;117(2):163-168 - PubMed
  33. Circulation. 1996 Mar 1;93(5):879-88 - PubMed
  34. Am J Cardiol. 2004 Mar 1;93(5):532-6 - PubMed
  35. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2013 Dec 10;13:113 - PubMed
  36. Eur Heart J. 2008 Apr;29(8):984-91 - PubMed

Publication Types