Display options
Share it on

J Thorac Dis. 2016 Jun;8(6):1227-33. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.04.60.

For non-small cell lung cancer with T3 (central) disease, sleeve lobectomy or pneumonectomy?.

Journal of thoracic disease

Qian-Li Ma, Yong-Qing Guo, Bin Shi, Yan-Chu Tian, Zhi-Yi Song, De-Ruo Liu

Affiliations

  1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing 100029, China.

PMID: 27293841 PMCID: PMC4886029 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2016.04.60

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pneumonectomy (PN) has traditionally been the treatment of choice for central lung tumors for which the alternative is sleeve lobectomy (SL). The aim of this study was to compare early and long-term results after SL and PN in focusing on T3 central non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS: Patients who underwent SL (n=58) or PN (n=42) were retrospectively analyzed. For bias reduction, these 100 patients had been selected according to the following criteria: (I) tumor located in the main bronchus less than 2 cm distal to the carina; (II) there were no N2 disease; (III) no induction therapy was applied; (IV) complete resection (R0) was achieved.

RESULTS: SL and PN patients had comparable mean ages, gender distribution, mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), stage and tumor grade. Postoperative mortality (3.4% vs. 4.8%, P=1.0) and morbidity (41% vs. 38%, P=0.74) were similar between the two groups. Recurrences occurred in 48% of patients after SL and in 31% of those after PN (P=0.08). The 5-year survival after SL (64.8%) and PN (61.4%) was not significantly different (P=0.20). Multivariable survival analysis showed that there were no independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS: SL does not compromise survival for NSCLC with T3 central disease compared with PN. It is an adequate oncologic resection and should be treated as the first line intervention whenever complete resection can be achieved.

Keywords: Sleeve lobectomy (SL); lung neoplasm; pneumonectomy (PN)

References

  1. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Jul;32(1):20-8 - PubMed
  2. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000 May;17(5):550-6 - PubMed
  3. J Thorac Oncol. 2008 Jun;3(6):604-8 - PubMed
  4. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002 Apr;21(4):601-5 - PubMed
  5. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Dec;80(6):2046-50 - PubMed
  6. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Oct;16(5):310-8 - PubMed
  7. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Apr;77(4):1152-6; discussion 1156 - PubMed
  8. J Thorac Dis. 2016 Mar;8(Suppl 2):S181-5 - PubMed
  9. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Sep;34(3):488-92; discussion 492 - PubMed
  10. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002 Sep;74(3):851-8; discussion 858-9 - PubMed
  11. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999 Jun;67(6):1557-62 - PubMed
  12. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003 Dec;76(6):1782-8 - PubMed
  13. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000 Apr;119(4 Pt 1):814-9 - PubMed
  14. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Mar;29(3):276-80 - PubMed
  15. Chest Surg Clin N Am. 1995 May;5(2):233-51 - PubMed
  16. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Mar;39(3):352-9 - PubMed
  17. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2002 Feb;43(1):103-8 - PubMed
  18. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998 Apr;115(4):836-40 - PubMed
  19. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Jan;97(1):230-5 - PubMed
  20. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Jan;31(1):95-102 - PubMed
  21. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Apr;79(4):1153-61; discussion 1153-61 - PubMed
  22. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Mar;79(3):968-73 - PubMed
  23. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Mar-Apr;61(2):69-90 - PubMed
  24. J Surg Oncol. 1997 Jan;64(1):32-5 - PubMed
  25. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Summer;18(2):92-5 - PubMed
  26. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992 Nov;104(5):1451-5 - PubMed
  27. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002 May;21(5):888-93 - PubMed

Publication Types