Display options
Share it on

Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2016 May 27;5(2):158-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2016.05.004. eCollection 2016 Aug.

Peroral Echinococcus multilocularis egg inoculation in Myodes glareolus, Mesocricetus auratus and Mus musculus (CD-1 IGS and C57BL/6j).

International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife

Ian David Woolsey, Per Moestrup Jensen, Peter Deplazes, Christian Moliin Outzen Kapel

Affiliations

  1. Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, 1871 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
  2. Institute of Parasitology, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstr. 266a, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland.

PMID: 27330986 PMCID: PMC4906142 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2016.05.004

Abstract

Echinococcus multilocularis transmission predominantly occurs in Europe between the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and various species of rodent intermediate hosts. We infected 3 species of rodent, Myodes glareolus (n = 47), Mesocricetus auratus (n = 11) and outbred Mus musculus (CD-1 IGS) (n = 9) with an E. multilocularis egg suspension that contained 100 eggs with viable oncospheres and performed post mortem examination 6, 8 (M. glareolus) and 10 weeks post inoculation (wpi). C57BL/6j mice (n = 4) were used as positive controls as they have been shown to exhibit macroscopic liver lesions 4 wpi. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to experimentally assess susceptibility in the ostensibly competent host M. glareolus. Lesions were only detected in 2 of 47 M. glareolus (4.3%) at 8 and 10 wpi and although both contained protoscolices (1675 at 8 wpi and 88 at 12 wpi) the low percentage of infected animals brings into question their role as transmitters of the parasite. Significant differences were observed between inbred and outbred mice with E. multilocularis infection in the former demonstrating increased establishment (p ≤ 0.0001) and growth (p ≤ 0.0001). No lesions were found in all 11 M. auratus.

Keywords: Echinococcus multilocularis; Intermediate hosts; Metacestode

References

  1. Science. 1999 Mar 12;283(5408):1748-52 - PubMed
  2. Parasitology. 2000 Apr;120 ( Pt 4):423-8 - PubMed
  3. Parasitology. 2002 Jun;124(Pt 6):631-40 - PubMed
  4. Parasitology. 2002 Aug;125(Pt 2):119-29 - PubMed
  5. Parasite Immunol. 2003 Apr;25(4):189-97 - PubMed
  6. Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Oct 22;270(1529):2151-7 - PubMed
  7. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004 Jan;17(1):107-35 - PubMed
  8. Trends Parasitol. 2004 Feb;20(2):77-84 - PubMed
  9. Parasitology. 2003;127 Suppl:S121-31 - PubMed
  10. Vet Parasitol. 2005 Jun 30;130(3-4):213-22 - PubMed
  11. Int J Parasitol. 2006 Jan;36(1):79-86 - PubMed
  12. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd. 2006 Sep;148(9):501-10 - PubMed
  13. Vet Parasitol. 2008 Feb 14;151(2-4):212-7 - PubMed
  14. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1991 Dec;22 Suppl:262-7 - PubMed
  15. Exp Parasitol. 2008 Aug;119(4):534-41 - PubMed
  16. Parasitology. 2009 Mar;136(3):329-37 - PubMed
  17. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010;2010:923193 - PubMed
  18. Parasitol Int. 2010 Sep;59(3):435-44 - PubMed
  19. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1990 Jul-Aug;84(4):571-2 - PubMed
  20. Parasit Vectors. 2011 Jan 19;4:6 - PubMed
  21. Euro Surveill. 2011 Apr 07;16(14):null - PubMed
  22. Parasitol Int. 2013 Aug;62(4):355-7 - PubMed
  23. Parasitol Res. 2015 May;114(5):1703-9 - PubMed
  24. J Parasitol. 2015 Jun;101(3):297-303 - PubMed
  25. Exp Parasitol. 2015 Jul;154:14-9 - PubMed
  26. Vet Parasitol. 2015 Oct 30;213(3-4):162-71 - PubMed
  27. Parasitol Int. 2015 Dec;64(6):571-5 - PubMed
  28. J Parasitol. 1972 Dec;58(6):1213-5 - PubMed
  29. Jpn J Vet Res. 1971 Jul;19:Suppl 3:1-53 - PubMed
  30. J Parasitol. 1970 Dec;56(6):1141-50 - PubMed
  31. Parasitology. 1995 Jan;110 ( Pt 1):79-86 - PubMed
  32. Int J Parasitol. 1996 Nov;26(11):1271-8 - PubMed
  33. Parasite Immunol. 1996 Sep;18(9):463-72 - PubMed
  34. Parasite Immunol. 1997 Nov;19(11):493-503 - PubMed

Publication Types