Display options
Share it on

Child Youth Care Forum. 2016;45:587-606. doi: 10.1007/s10566-015-9344-8. Epub 2016 Jan 19.

Randomized Video-Feedback Intervention in Home-Based Childcare: Improvement of Children's Wellbeing Dependent on Time Spent with Trusted Caregiver.

Child & youth care forum

Marleen G Groeneveld, Harriet J Vermeer, Marinus H van IJzendoorn, Mariëlle Linting

Affiliations

  1. Centre for Child and Family Studies, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9555, 2300 RB Leiden, The Netherlands.

PMID: 27429535 PMCID: PMC4923105 DOI: 10.1007/s10566-015-9344-8

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The childcare environment offers a wide array of developmental opportunities for children. Providing children with a feeling of security to explore this environment is one of the most fundamental goals of childcare.

OBJECTIVE: In the current study the effectiveness of Video-feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting-Child Care (VIPP-CC) was tested on children's wellbeing in home-based childcare in a randomized controlled trial.

METHODS: Forty-seven children and their caregivers were randomly assigned to the intervention group or control group. Children's wellbeing, caregiver sensitivity, and global childcare quality were observed during a pretest and a posttest.

RESULTS: We did not find an overall intervention effect on child wellbeing, but a significant interaction effect with months spent with a trusted caregiver was present. Children who were less familiar with the caregiver showed an increase in wellbeing scores in both the intervention and control group, but for the group of children who were more familiar with the caregiver, wellbeing increased only in the intervention group.

CONCLUSIONS: Although there was no overall effect of the VIPP-CC on children's wellbeing, the VIPP-CC seems effective in children who have been cared for by the same trusted caregiver for a longer period of time.

Keywords: Children’s wellbeing; Home-based childcare; Randomized controlled trial; VIPP; Video-based intervention

References

  1. Child Dev. 2001 Sep-Oct;72(5):1478-500 - PubMed
  2. Psychol Sci. 2002 May;13(3):199-206 - PubMed
  3. Psychol Bull. 2003 Mar;129(2):195-215 - PubMed
  4. Child Dev. 2004 May-Jun;75(3):639-50 - PubMed
  5. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2004 Jul;35(3):254-68 - PubMed
  6. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2005 Mar;46(3):263-74 - PubMed
  7. Am J Psychiatry. 2006 May;163(5):899-906 - PubMed
  8. J Fam Psychol. 2006 Jun;20(2):266-274 - PubMed
  9. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Dec;74(6):994-1005 - PubMed
  10. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Jul;161(7):669-76 - PubMed
  11. Dev Psychol. 2008 Jan;44(1):293-300 - PubMed
  12. Psychol Bull. 1991 Jul;110(1):26-46 - PubMed
  13. Child Care Health Dev. 2009 Sep;35(5):613-23 - PubMed
  14. Early Child Res Q. 2008 Oct 1;23(4):527-546 - PubMed
  15. Child Care Health Dev. 2012 Mar;38(2):251-60 - PubMed
  16. J Fam Psychol. 2011 Feb;25(1):86-96 - PubMed
  17. Child Care Health Dev. 2013 Sep;39(5):737-42 - PubMed
  18. NHSA Dialog. 2011 Oct 1;14(4):189-212 - PubMed
  19. Prev Sci. 2016 Feb;17(2):259-73 - PubMed
  20. Infant Ment Health J. 2006 Sep;27(5):466-493 - PubMed
  21. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1985;50(1-2):147-66 - PubMed
  22. Child Dev. 1998 Aug;69(4):1145-70 - PubMed
  23. J Genet Psychol. 1998 Dec;159(4):437-54 - PubMed

Publication Types