Display options
Share it on

World J Hepatol. 2016 Jul 08;8(19):815-24. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v8.i19.815.

Is neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin useful in hepatitis C virus infection?.

World journal of hepatology

Alessio Strazzulla, Giuseppe Coppolino, Concetta Di Fatta, Francesca Giancotti, Giuseppina D'Onofrio, Maria Concetta Postorino, Maria Mazzitelli, Selma Valerie Mammone, Innocenza Gentile, Laura Rivoli, Eleonora Palella, Tiziana Gravina, Chiara Costa, Vincenzo Pisani, Vincenzo De Maria, Giorgio Settimo Barreca, Nadia Marascio, Alfredo Focà, Giorgio Fuiano, Elio Gulletta, Carlo Torti

Affiliations

  1. Alessio Strazzulla, Maria Concetta Postorino, Maria Mazzitelli, Selma Valerie Mammone, Chiara Costa, Vincenzo Pisani, Carlo Torti, Infectious Diseases Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, "Magna Graecia" University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.

PMID: 27429717 PMCID: PMC4937169 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v8.i19.815

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin (NGAL) in patients infected by hepatitis C virus (HCV) before and during treatment with directly acting antivirals (DAAs).

METHODS: NGAL was measured in a group of patients with chronic HCV infection ranked, at baseline, by age, gender, anti-hypertensive therapy, HCV viral load, liver fibrosis stage and, either at baseline or after 1 year, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Then, NGAL and eGFR evolutions were monitored in a subgroup of patients who started antiviral therapy with DAAs. Differences of median NGAL levels were evaluated through Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test for non-parametric data. Differences in dichotomous variables were evaluated through χ (2) test. At baseline, a univariate regression analysis was conducted to verify if NGAL values correlated with other quantitative variables [age, fibrosis four (FIB-4), AST to platelet ratio index (APRI), and eGFR].

RESULTS: Overall, 48 patients were enrolled, 8 of them starting HCV treatment. At baseline, statistically significant differences were found in median NGAL values only between patients with eGFR < 60 mL/min vs patients with eGFR ≥ 90 mL/min. Differences in NGAL were not significant among patients ranked by HCV viral load, FIB-4 score and APRI, when patients with NGAL > 118.11 ng/dL were compared with those of NGAL ≤ 118.11 ng/dL, not statistically significant differences were present for age, gender, chronic kidney disease classification and liver fibrosis (P > 0.05). Linear correlation was found between NGAL and both age (P = 0.0475) and eGFR (P = 0.0282) values. Not statistically significant predictions of NGAL at baseline were demonstrated for eGFR evolution 1 year later. Interestingly, in the 8 patients treated with DAAs, median NGAL significantly increased at week 12 compared to baseline (P = 0.0239).

CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that NGAL should be further evaluated as an adjunct marker of kidney function in these patients.

Keywords: Directly acting antivirals; Hepatitis C virus; Inflammation; Neutrophil gelatinase lipocalin; Tubular impairment

References

  1. Liver Transpl. 2010 Nov;16(11):1257-66 - PubMed
  2. Liver Int. 2014 Jan;34(1):49-57 - PubMed
  3. Clin Exp Immunol. 2005 Jun;140(3):498-506 - PubMed
  4. J Investig Med. 2008 Dec;56(8):997-1003 - PubMed
  5. Nephrology (Carlton). 2010 Feb;15(1):23-6 - PubMed
  6. AIDS. 2015 Jul 17;29(11):1325-33 - PubMed
  7. Dig Liver Dis. 2014 Dec 15;46 Suppl 5:S165-73 - PubMed
  8. Lancet. 2005 Apr 2-8;365(9466):1231-8 - PubMed
  9. Hepatology. 2014 Jun;59(6):2426 - PubMed
  10. PLoS One. 2015 Dec 15;10(12):e0145042 - PubMed
  11. Clin Biochem Rev. 2016 Feb;37(1):17-26 - PubMed
  12. Gut. 2016 Jan 4;:null - PubMed
  13. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2010 Sep;70(5):374-82 - PubMed
  14. PLoS One. 2014 Oct 20;9(10 ):e110527 - PubMed
  15. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008 Sep;52(3):595-605 - PubMed
  16. Nephrology (Carlton). 2015 Nov;20(11):843-8 - PubMed
  17. Pediatr Nephrol. 2007 Dec;22(12 ):2089-95 - PubMed
  18. World J Hepatol. 2015 Apr 28;7(6):885-95 - PubMed
  19. Am J Transplant. 2006 Jul;6(7):1639-45 - PubMed
  20. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 Feb;4(2):337-44 - PubMed
  21. Coll Antropol. 2015 Mar;39(1):75-9 - PubMed
  22. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2013 Mar;3(1):50-60 - PubMed
  23. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:815484 - PubMed
  24. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2015;8(6):785-93 - PubMed
  25. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001 Feb;13(2):149-55 - PubMed
  26. J Hepatol. 2015 Sep;63(3):593-600 - PubMed
  27. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2015 ;14 (12 ):1815-25 - PubMed
  28. Ann Hepatol. 2008 Oct-Dec;7(4):350-7 - PubMed
  29. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011 Sep;26(9):2735-42 - PubMed
  30. Nephron Clin Pract. 2008;108(3):c176-81 - PubMed
  31. World J Hepatol. 2015 Feb 27;7(2):213-25 - PubMed
  32. Crit Care Med. 2008 Apr;36(4):1297-303 - PubMed
  33. J Med Life. 2015 ;8 Spec Issue:15-20 - PubMed
  34. PLoS One. 2014 Nov 24;9(11):e113351 - PubMed
  35. Hepatology. 2007 Jul;46(1):32-6 - PubMed
  36. Liver Transpl. 2002 Nov;8(11):1007-13 - PubMed
  37. Hepatology. 2011 Mar;53(3):726-36 - PubMed

Publication Types