Display options
Cite
Shapiro AC, Aguilar-Amuchastegui N, Hostert P, et al. Using fragmentation to assess degradation of forest edges in Democratic Republic of Congo. Carbon Balance Manag. 2016;11(1):11doi: 10.1186/s13021-016-0054-9.
Shapiro, A. C., Aguilar-Amuchastegui, N., Hostert, P., & Bastin, J. F. (2016). Using fragmentation to assess degradation of forest edges in Democratic Republic of Congo. Carbon balance and management, 11(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-016-0054-9
Shapiro, Aurélie C, et al. "Using fragmentation to assess degradation of forest edges in Democratic Republic of Congo." Carbon balance and management vol. 11,1 (2016): 11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-016-0054-9
Shapiro AC, Aguilar-Amuchastegui N, Hostert P, Bastin JF. Using fragmentation to assess degradation of forest edges in Democratic Republic of Congo. Carbon Balance Manag. 2016 Jun 22;11(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13021-016-0054-9. eCollection 2016 Dec. PMID: 27398090; PMCID: PMC4917581.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Carbon Balance Manag. 2016 Jun 22;11(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13021-016-0054-9. eCollection 2016 Dec.

Using fragmentation to assess degradation of forest edges in Democratic Republic of Congo.

Carbon balance and management

Aurélie C Shapiro, Naikoa Aguilar-Amuchastegui, Patrick Hostert, Jean-François Bastin

Affiliations

  1. World Wide Fund for Nature Germany, Reinhardtstr 18, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
  2. World Wildlife Fund-US Forest and Climate Program, 1250 24th st. NW, Washington, DC 20037 USA.
  3. Geography Department, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Unter Den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany ; Integrative Research Institute On Transformations of Human-Environment Systems (IRI THESys), Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Unter Den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany.
  4. Landscape Ecology and Plant Production Systems Unit, Université Libre de Bruxelles, CP264-2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium ; BIOSE Department, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, Université de Liège, B-5030 Gembloux, Belgium.

PMID: 27398090 PMCID: PMC4917581 DOI: 10.1186/s13021-016-0054-9

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that fragmentation is an increasing threat to global forests, which has major impacts on biodiversity and the important ecosystem services provided by forested landscapes. Several tools have been developed to evaluate global patterns of fragmentation, which have potential applications for REDD+. We study how canopy height and above ground biomass (AGB) change across several categories of forest edges determined by fragmentation analysis. We use Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) as an example.

RESULTS: An analysis of variance of different edge widths and airborne estimated canopy height found that canopy heights were significantly different in forest edges at a distance of 100 m from the nonforest edge. Biomass was significantly different between fragmentation classes at an edge distance of 300 m. Core forest types were found to have significantly higher canopy height and greater AGB than forest edges and patches, where height and biomass decrease significantly as the level of fragmentation increases. A change analysis shows that deforestation and degradation are increasing over time and biomass loss associated with degradation account for at least one quarter of total loss. We estimate that about 80 % of primary forests are intact, which decreases 3.5 % over the 15 year study period, as primary forest is either deforested or transitioned to forest edge. While the carbon loss per hectare is lower than that of deforestation, degradation potentially affects up to three times more area than deforestation alone.

CONCLUSIONS: When defining forest degradation by decreased biomass without any loss in forest area, assessing transitions of core forest to edges over time can contribute an important element to REDD+MRV systems. The estimation of changes between different forest fragmentation types and their associated biomass loss can provide an estimate of degradation carbon emission factors. Forest degradation and emissions due to fragmentation are often underestimated and should comprise an essential component of MRV systems.

Keywords: Biomass; Conservation; Emissions; Forest degradation; Fragmentation; REDD

References

  1. Carbon Balance Manag. 2009 Aug 26;4:7 - PubMed
  2. Nat Commun. 2015 Dec 18;6:10158 - PubMed
  3. Carbon Balance Manag. 2011 Nov 24;6(1):13 - PubMed
  4. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Mar 29;359(1443):345-52 - PubMed
  5. Science. 2011 Aug 19;333(6045):988-93 - PubMed
  6. Science. 2008 Jun 13;320(5882):1458-60 - PubMed
  7. Carbon Balance Manag. 2010 Dec 27;5:9 - PubMed
  8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jan 14;111(2):567-8 - PubMed
  9. Oecologia. 2004 Aug;140(3):468-79 - PubMed
  10. Science. 2005 Jul 22;309(5734):570-4 - PubMed
  11. Science. 2012 Jun 22;336(6088):1573-6 - PubMed
  12. Conserv Biol. 2015 Apr;29(2):350-9 - PubMed
  13. Sci Adv. 2015 Mar 20;1(2):e1500052 - PubMed
  14. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Aug 22;103(34):12947-50 - PubMed
  15. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Feb 28;360(1454):373-84 - PubMed
  16. Science. 1993 Jun 25;260(5116):1905-10 - PubMed
  17. Ambio. 2016 Sep;45(5):538-50 - PubMed
  18. Science. 2014 May 30;344(6187):981 - PubMed
  19. Science. 2005 Oct 21;310(5747):480-2 - PubMed
  20. Science. 2013 Nov 15;342(6160):850-3 - PubMed
  21. Nature. 2013 Oct 10;502(7470):151 - PubMed

Publication Types