Display options
Share it on

J Orthop Case Rep. 2014 Apr-Jun;4(2):28-32. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.163.

Scalloping Sacral Arachnoid Cyst as a Cause of Perianal Pain- A Case Report.

Journal of orthopaedic case reports

Himanshu Ravindra Tyagi, Kashmiri Lal Kalra, Shankar Acharya, Rupinder Pal Singh

Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Orthospine, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Old Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi, India-110060.

PMID: 27298955 PMCID: PMC4719369 DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.163

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Scalloping sacral arachnoid cyst though a rare condition, should be suspected in cases of persistent perianal pain without any obvious urological or anorectal pathology. Such difficult cases justify ordering an M.R.I of spine as plain X-Rays and clinical examination may come out to be inconclusive. X-ray in later stages may show changes corresponding to scalloping of bone due pressure effect of cyst on surrounding tissue. Diagnosis may further be confirmed by doing contrast MRI which differentiates arachnoid cyst from other intradural and extradural pathologies. Though anatomically spinal arachnoid cysts are just an out pouching from the spinal meningeal sac or nerve root sheath they may be extradural or intradural in their location, communicating to main C.S.F column through their pedicle or an ostium leading to continuous enlargement in size.

CASE REPORT: A 32 year old female was admitted under our spine unit with 1.5 year history of chronic pain, swelling and reduced sensation in perianal region. On examination she had tenderness and hypoesthesia over lower sacral region. The pain was continuous, dull aching in nature, not related to activity, localized over lower sacrum and perianal area. The neurological examination of her both lower limbs were unremarkable. Anal tone and anal reflex were normal. No sign of inflammation or tenderness was found over coccyx. Since the X-rays were inconclusive an MRI scan was done which showed a cystic lesion in the sacral area extending from S2 to S4 region with mechanical scalloping effect on the surrounding bone. The lesion had same intensity as C.S.F in both T1 &T2 weighted images. The treatment was done by way of surgical decompression with complete excision of cyst and obliteration of space by a posterior midline approach. Presently the patient is 1 year post operative and no sign of recurrence is there.

CONCLUSION: Sacral arachnoid cysts should be considered as a differential diagnosis of perianal pain. Large symptomatic sacral cysts should be treated early with complete removal of the cyst including the cyst wall, to reduce the chances of recurrence. Complete decompression of the cyst cavity should be aimed at, but careful dissection of neural element is of highest importance.

Keywords: Perianal pain; arachnoid cyst; sacral arachnoid cyst; spinal cyst

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: Nil

References

  1. Spinal Cord. 2006 Jan;44(1):59-62 - PubMed
  2. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2006 May;148(5):579-85; discussion 585 - PubMed
  3. Surg Neurol. 2003 Jul;60(1):49-55; discussion 55-6 - PubMed
  4. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1977;39(1-2):127-9 - PubMed
  5. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006 Aug;5(2):111-6 - PubMed
  6. Neurosurgery. 2010 Sep;67(3):824-36 - PubMed
  7. N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 1;357(18):1821-8 - PubMed
  8. Neurosurgery. 1991 Aug;29(2):223-6 - PubMed
  9. J Neurosurg. 1988 Mar;68(3):366-77 - PubMed
  10. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Oct 1;29(19):E426-30 - PubMed
  11. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003 Apr;16(2):207-11 - PubMed
  12. Turk Neurosurg. 2008 Jan;18(1):52-5 - PubMed
  13. Cases J. 2009 May 20;2:7531 - PubMed
  14. Ann Surg. 1968 Nov;168(5):851-64 - PubMed
  15. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 1999 Dec;101(4):260-3 - PubMed
  16. Surg Neurol. 1982 May;17 (5):388-91 - PubMed
  17. Eur Spine J. 2002 Apr;11(2):162-6 - PubMed
  18. J Clin Neurosci. 2011 Sep;18(9):1189-92 - PubMed
  19. No Shinkei Geka. 1988 Jun;16(7):893-7 - PubMed

Publication Types