Display options
Cite
Choi N, Noh Y, Park W, et al. Comparison of Endoscopic Tympanoplasty to Microscopic Tympanoplasty. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;10(1):44-49doi: 10.21053/ceo.2016.00080.
Choi, N., Noh, Y., Park, W., Lee, J. J., Yook, S., Choi, J. E., Chung, W. H., Cho, Y. S., Hong, S. H., & Moon, I. J. (2017). Comparison of Endoscopic Tympanoplasty to Microscopic Tympanoplasty. Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology, 10(1), 44-49. https://doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2016.00080
Choi, Nayeon, et al. "Comparison of Endoscopic Tympanoplasty to Microscopic Tympanoplasty." Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology vol. 10,1 (2017): 44-49. doi: https://doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2016.00080
Choi N, Noh Y, Park W, Lee JJ, Yook S, Choi JE, Chung WH, Cho YS, Hong SH, Moon IJ. Comparison of Endoscopic Tympanoplasty to Microscopic Tympanoplasty. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Mar;10(1):44-49. doi: 10.21053/ceo.2016.00080. Epub 2016 Jun 18. PMID: 27334511; PMCID: PMC5327595.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Mar;10(1):44-49. doi: 10.21053/ceo.2016.00080. Epub 2016 Jun 18.

Comparison of Endoscopic Tympanoplasty to Microscopic Tympanoplasty.

Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology

Nayeon Choi, Yangseop Noh, Woori Park, Jung Joo Lee, Sunhyun Yook, Ji Eun Choi, Won-Ho Chung, Yang-Sun Cho, Sung Hwa Hong, Il Joon Moon

Affiliations

  1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  2. Department of Medical Device Management and Research, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.

PMID: 27334511 PMCID: PMC5327595 DOI: 10.21053/ceo.2016.00080

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the outcome of endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty.

METHODS: This was a retrospective comparative study of 73 patients (35 males and 38 females) who underwent type I tympanoplasty at Samsung Medical Center from April to December 2014. The subjects were classified into two groups; endoscopic tympanoplasty (ET, n=25), microscopic tympanoplasty (MT, n=48). Demographic data, perforation size of tympanic membrane at preoperative state, pure tone audiometric results preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively, operation time, sequential postoperative pain scale (NRS-11), and graft success rate were evaluated.

RESULTS: The perforation size of the tympanic membrane in ET and MT group was 25.3%±11.7% and 20.1%±11.9%, respectively (

CONCLUSION: With endoscopic system, minimal invasive tympanoplasty can be possible with similar graft success rate and less pain.

Keywords: Endoscopy; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; Pain; Tympanoplasty

References

  1. Otol Neurotol. 2002 Sep;23(5):631-5 - PubMed
  2. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2014 Jun;34(3):153-7 - PubMed
  3. Laryngoscope. 1996 Feb;106(2 Pt 1):213-6 - PubMed
  4. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Aug;37(4):481-7 - PubMed
  5. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Nov;270(12):2997-3004 - PubMed
  6. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Jul;78(7):1084-9 - PubMed
  7. Otol Neurotol. 2011 Apr;32(3):433-6 - PubMed
  8. J Laryngol Otol. 1955 Oct;69(10):637-52 - PubMed
  9. Laryngoscope. 2004 Jul;114(7):1157-62 - PubMed
  10. Laryngoscope. 2014 Aug;124(8):E332-9 - PubMed
  11. Laryngoscope. 2015 May;125(5):1205-14 - PubMed
  12. J Laryngol Otol. 2008 Feb;122(2):120-4 - PubMed
  13. Laryngoscope. 2010 Sep;120(9):1880-6 - PubMed
  14. Laryngoscope. 1993 Aug;103(8):939-43 - PubMed
  15. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac. 1990;107(8):564-70 - PubMed
  16. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Nov;268(11):1557-63 - PubMed
  17. Otol Neurotol. 2010 Jun;31(4):580-8 - PubMed
  18. Acta Otolaryngol. 2009 Sep;129(9):946-54 - PubMed
  19. Laryngoscope. 2014 Oct;124(10):2386-92 - PubMed
  20. Otol Neurotol. 2008 Dec;29(8):1085-90 - PubMed
  21. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1999 Sep;108(9):893-6 - PubMed
  22. Laryngoscope. 1997 Aug;107(8):1094-9 - PubMed

Publication Types