Display options
Cite
Fricker L, Penna V, Lampert F, et al. A self-made, low-cost infrared system for evaluating the sciatic functional index in mice. Neural Regen Res. 2016;11(5):829-34doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.182712.
Fricker, L., Penna, V., Lampert, F., Stark, G. B., Witzel, C., & Koulaxouzidis, G. (2016). A self-made, low-cost infrared system for evaluating the sciatic functional index in mice. Neural regeneration research, 11(5), 829-34. https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.182712
Fricker, Lukas, et al. "A self-made, low-cost infrared system for evaluating the sciatic functional index in mice." Neural regeneration research vol. 11,5 (2016): 829-34. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.182712
Fricker L, Penna V, Lampert F, Stark GB, Witzel C, Koulaxouzidis G. A self-made, low-cost infrared system for evaluating the sciatic functional index in mice. Neural Regen Res. 2016 May;11(5):829-34. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.182712. PMID: 27335570; PMCID: PMC4904477.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Neural Regen Res. 2016 May;11(5):829-34. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.182712.

A self-made, low-cost infrared system for evaluating the sciatic functional index in mice.

Neural regeneration research

Lukas Fricker, Vincenzo Penna, Florian Lampert, G Bjoern Stark, Christian Witzel, Georgios Koulaxouzidis

Affiliations

  1. Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.
  2. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

PMID: 27335570 PMCID: PMC4904477 DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.182712

Abstract

The sciatic functional index (SFI) is a popular parameter for peripheral nerve evaluation that relies on footprints obtained with ink and paper. Drawbacks include smearing artefacts and a lack of dynamic information during measurement. Modern applications use digitized systems that can deliver results with less analytical effort and fewer mice. However, the systems are expensive (€40,000). This study aimed to evaluate the applicability and precision of a self-made, low-cost infrared system for evaluating SFI in mice. Mice were subjected to unilateral sciatic nerve crush injury (crush group; n = 7) and sham operation (sham group; n = 4). They were evaluated on the day before surgery, the 2(nd), 4(th) and 6(th) days after injury, and then every day up to the 23(rd) day after injury. We compared two SFI evaluation methods, i.e., conventional ink-and-paper SFI (C-SFI) and our infrared system (I-SFI). Our apparatus visualized footprints with totally internally reflected infrared light (950 nm) and a camera that can only detect this wavelength. Additionally we performed an analysis with the ladder beam walking test (LBWT) as a reference test. I-SFI assessment reduced the standard deviation by about 33 percent, from 11.6 to 7.8, and cut the variance around the baseline to 21 percent. The system thus requires fewer measurement repetitions and fewer animals, and cuts the cost of keeping the animals. The apparatus cost €321 to build. Our results show that the process of obtaining the SFI can be made more precise via digitization with a self-made, low-cost infrared system.

Keywords: crush; error rate; frustrated total internal reflection; infrared; ladder beam walking test; mouse; nerve regeneration; neural regeneration; peripheral nerve injury; sciatic nerve

References

  1. J Neurosci Methods. 2007 Apr 15;161(2):259-64 - PubMed
  2. Stroke Res Treat. 2013;2013:418627 - PubMed
  3. Microsurgery. 1998;18(2):119-24 - PubMed
  4. Exp Neurol. 1982 Sep;77(3):634-43 - PubMed
  5. J Neurosci Methods. 2000 Mar 15;96(2):89-96 - PubMed
  6. Exp Neurol. 2010 May;223(1):203-6 - PubMed
  7. J Neurosci Methods. 2007 Nov 30;166(2):266-77 - PubMed
  8. Eur J Neurosci. 2016 Feb;43(3):271-86 - PubMed
  9. Eur J Neurosci. 2005 Aug;22(4):802-8 - PubMed
  10. Laryngoscope. 1998 Aug;108(8 Pt 1):1141-5 - PubMed
  11. Brain Res. 2004 Nov 19;1027(1-2):67-72 - PubMed
  12. Exp Neurol. 2004 Dec;190(2):347-55 - PubMed
  13. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989 Jan;83(1):129-38 - PubMed
  14. Behav Brain Res. 2007 Feb 27;177(2):232-41 - PubMed
  15. J Neurosci Methods. 2000 Oct 30;102(2):109-16 - PubMed
  16. J Vis Exp. 2009 Jun 12;(28):null - PubMed
  17. J Neurosci Methods. 2006 May 15;153(1):104-13 - PubMed
  18. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1995 Aug;33(8):525-7 - PubMed
  19. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2009 Feb;68(1):1-7 - PubMed
  20. J Neurosci Methods. 2008 May 30;170(2):255-61 - PubMed

Publication Types