Display options
Share it on

Basic Clin Neurosci. 2016 Jan;7(1):43-8.

Evaluation of Berlin Questionnaire Validity for Sleep Apnea Risk in Sleep Clinic Populations.

Basic and clinical neuroscience

Behnam Khaledi-Paveh, Habibolah Khazaie, Marzie Nasouri, Mohammad Rasoul Ghadami, Masoud Tahmasian

Affiliations

  1. Sleep Disorders Research Center, School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
  2. Sleep Disorders Research Center, School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.; Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

PMID: 27303598 PMCID: PMC4892329

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Berlin questionnaire (BQ) is a common tool to screen for Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) in the general population, but its application in the clinical sleep setting is still challenging. The aim of this study was to determine the specificity and sensitivity of the BQ compared to the apnea-hypopnea index obtained from polysomnography recordings obtained from a sleep clinic in Iran.

METHODS: We recruited 100 patients who were referred to the Sleep Disorders Research Center of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences for the evaluation of suspected sleep-disorder breathing difficulties. Patients completed a Persian version of BQ and underwent one night of PSG. For each patient, Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) was calculated to assess the diagnosis and severity of OSA. Severity of OSA was categorized as mild when AHI was between 5 and 15, moderate when it was between 15 and 30, and severe when it was more than 30.

RESULTS: BQ results categorized 65% of our patients as high risk and 35% as low risk for OSA. The sensitivity and the specificity of BQ for OSA diagnosis with AHI>5 were 77.3% and 23.1%, respectively. Positive predictive value was 68.0% and negative predictive value was 22.0%. Moreover, the area under curve was 0.53 (95% CI: 0.49 - 0.67, P=0.38).

DISCUSSION: Our findings suggested that BQ, despite its advantages in the general population, is not a precise tool to determine the risk of sleep apnea in the clinical setting, particularly in the sleep clinic population.

Keywords: Berlin questionnaire; Obstructive; Sleep apnea; Sleep clinic; Validation

References

  1. Sleep Breath. 2011 Sep;15(3):425-9 - PubMed
  2. BMC Pulm Med. 2013 Jan 24;13:6 - PubMed
  3. J Clin Sleep Med. 2012 Jun 15;8(3):323-32 - PubMed
  4. Sleep Breath. 2009 Aug;13(3):227-32 - PubMed
  5. Chest. 2006 Sep;130(3):780-6 - PubMed
  6. Sleep Breath. 2014 Sep;18(3):549-54 - PubMed
  7. Sleep. 2007 Nov;30(11):1445-59 - PubMed
  8. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Dec;269(12):2549-53 - PubMed
  9. Int J Prev Med. 2013 Mar;4(3):334-9 - PubMed
  10. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Mar;270(3):1131-6 - PubMed
  11. G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2008 Jul;9(7):472-81 - PubMed
  12. Rev Port Pneumol. 2011 Mar-Apr;17(2):59-65 - PubMed
  13. Adv Cardiol. 2011;46:1-42 - PubMed
  14. B-ENT. 2014;10(1):21-5 - PubMed
  15. Sleep Breath. 2013 May;17(2):803-10 - PubMed
  16. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990 Jul;142(1):14-8 - PubMed
  17. Ann Intern Med. 1999 Oct 5;131(7):485-91 - PubMed
  18. Chest. 1994 Jun;105(6):1753-8 - PubMed
  19. Saudi Med J. 2008 Mar;29(3):423-6 - PubMed
  20. Eur Respir J. 1996 Jan;9(1):117-24 - PubMed
  21. Arch Iran Med. 2011 Sep;14 (5):335-8 - PubMed
  22. Sleep. 2009 Feb;32(2):150-7 - PubMed
  23. Clin Respir J. 2014 Jul;8(3):292-6 - PubMed
  24. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004 Mar 15;169(6):668-72 - PubMed
  25. Neth J Med. 2006 Sep;64(8):280-9 - PubMed
  26. Pneumologie. 2006 Dec;60(12):737-42 - PubMed
  27. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008 Jul;81(1):2-12 - PubMed
  28. Sleep Breath. 2008 Mar;12(1):39-45 - PubMed
  29. Ann Thorac Med. 2011 Oct;6(4):212-6 - PubMed

Publication Types