Display options
Share it on

J Geriatr Cardiol. 2016 May;13(4):326-32. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2016.04.006.

Attitudes towards acceptance of an innovative home-based and remote sensing rehabilitation protocol among cardiovascular patients in Shantou, China.

Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC

Jia-Ying Fang, Ji-Lin Li, Zhong-Han Li, Duan-Min Xu, Chang Chen, Bin Xie, Helen Chen, William W Au

Affiliations

  1. Department of Preventive Medicine, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
  2. Department of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
  3. School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.

PMID: 27403142 PMCID: PMC4921545 DOI: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2016.04.006

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) protocols have diversified to include home-based cardiac tele-rehabilitation (HBCTR) as an alternative to hospital-based or center-based CR. To adopt the use of home-based cardiac tele-rehabilitation, it is necessary to assess cardiac patients' attitudes towards acceptance of such e-health technology, especially in China where knowledge of such technology is deficient.

METHODS: Interviews were conducted in the First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China. After percutaneous coronary interventional (PCI) surgery, patients completed the survey.

RESULTS: Among the 150 patients, only 13% had ever heard of HBCTR. After an introduction of our HBCTR program, 60% of patients were willing to participate in the program. From our multivariate analysis of questionnaire data, age (OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86-0.98; P = 0.007), average family monthly income (OR: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.05-0.34; P < 0.001), education level (OR: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.10-0.59; P = 0.002) and physical exercise time (OR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.06-0.56; P = 0.003) were independent predictors for acceptance of HBCTR. From the reasons for participation, patients selected: enhanced safety and independence (28.3%), ability to self-monitor physical conditions daily (25.4%), and having automatic and emergency alert (23.1%). Reasons for refusal were: too cumbersome operation (34.3%) and unnecessary protocol (19.4%).

CONCLUSIONS: Most patients lacked knowledge about HBCTR but volunteered to participate after they have learned about the program. Several personal and life-style factors influenced their acceptance of the program. These indicate that both improvement of technology and better understanding of the program will enhance active participation.

Keywords: Cardiac rehabilitation; Mobile health; Remote-sensing; Tele-rehabilitation

References

  1. Am Heart J. 2012 Apr;163(4):714-9 - PubMed
  2. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Jun;49(6):755-71 - PubMed
  3. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug 08;12:243 - PubMed
  4. BMJ Open. 2012 Dec 18;2(6):null - PubMed
  5. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010 Feb;17(1):1-17 - PubMed
  6. Med Inform Internet Med. 2004 Jun;29(2):87-94 - PubMed
  7. J Clin Nurs. 2007 Apr;16(4):662-71 - PubMed
  8. BMJ. 2010 Jan 19;340:b5631 - PubMed
  9. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2014 Sep-Oct;57(2):152-9 - PubMed
  10. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2014 Feb 17;14:20 - PubMed
  11. Rehabil Nurs. 2002 May-Jun;27(3):104-9 - PubMed
  12. JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Oct;175(10):1700-2 - PubMed
  13. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013 Jun;20(2 Suppl):12-6 - PubMed
  14. Eur J Heart Fail. 2010 Feb;12(2):164-71 - PubMed
  15. Int J Rehabil Res. 2005 Sep;28(3):251-7 - PubMed
  16. Clin Rehabil. 2007 Mar;21(3):222-9 - PubMed
  17. Public Health. 2005 Nov;119(11):1016-22 - PubMed
  18. JAMA. 2004 Mar 3;291(9):1100-7 - PubMed
  19. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002 Oct;34(10):1544-50 - PubMed
  20. Am J Cardiol. 2008 Dec 15;102(12):1583-8 - PubMed
  21. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2009 May-Jun;29(3):183-7 - PubMed
  22. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jan-Feb;21(1):56-63 - PubMed

Publication Types