Display options
Share it on

AMB Express. 2016 Dec;6(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13568-016-0214-z. Epub 2016 Jul 04.

Prevalence of 'Candidatus Accumulibacter phosphatis' type II under phosphate limiting conditions.

AMB Express

L Welles, C M Lopez-Vazquez, C M Hooijmans, M C M van Loosdrecht, D Brdjanovic

Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Engineering and Water Technology, UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Westvest 7, 2611AX, Delft, The Netherlands. [email protected].
  2. Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Van der Maasweg 9, 2629 HZ, Delft, The Netherlands. [email protected].
  3. Department of Environmental Engineering and Water Technology, UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Westvest 7, 2611AX, Delft, The Netherlands.
  4. Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Van der Maasweg 9, 2629 HZ, Delft, The Netherlands.
  5. KWR watercycle research institute, Groningenhaven 7, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.

PMID: 27376945 PMCID: PMC4932009 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-016-0214-z

Abstract

P-limitation in enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) systems fed with acetate, has generally been considered as a condition leading to enrichment of organisms of the genotype' Candidatus Competibacter phosphatis' expressing the glycogen-accumulating organisms (GAO) phenotype. Recent studies have demonstrated in short-term experiments that organisms of the genotype 'Candidatus Accumulibacter phosphatis' clade I and II, known to express the polyphosphate-accumulating organisms (PAO) phenotype can switch to the GAO phenotype when poly-P is absent, but are performing the HAc-uptake at lower kinetic rates, where clade I showed the lowest rates. The objective of this study was to verify whether organisms of the genotype 'Candidatus Accumulibacter phosphatis' can also be enriched under P-limiting conditions while expressing a GAO phenotype and more specifically to see which specific clade prevails. A sequencing batch reactor was inoculated with activated sludge to enrich an EBPR culture for a cultivation period of 128 days (16 times the solids retention time) under P-limiting conditions. A mixed culture was obtained comprising of 49 % 'Candidatus Accumulibacter phosphatis' clade II and 46 % 'Candidatus Competibacter phosphatis'. The culture performed a full GAO metabolism for anaerobic HAc-uptake, but was still able to switch to a PAO metabolism, taking up excessive amounts of phosphate during the aerobic phase when it became available in the influent. These findings show that P-limitation, often used as strategy for enrichment of 'Candidatus Competibacter phosphatis', does not always lead to enrichment of only 'Candidatus Competibacter phosphatis'. Furthermore, it demonstrates that 'Candidatus Accumulibacter phosphatis' are able to proliferate in activated sludge systems for periods of up to 128 days or longer when the influent phosphate concentrations are just enough for assimilation purposes and no poly-P is formed. The 'Candidatus Accumulibacter phosphatis' retain the ability to switch to the PAO phenotype, taking up phosphate from the influent as soon as it becomes available.

Keywords: Enhanced biological phosphate removal (EBPR); Glycogen-accumulating organisms (GAO); Microbial ecology; Niche differentiation; Polyphosphate content; Polyphosphate-accumulating organisms (PAO); ‘Candidatus Accumulibacter phosphatis’; ‘Candidatus Competibacter phosphatis’

References

  1. Water Res. 2007 Nov;41(19):4383-96 - PubMed
  2. Water Res. 2008 May;42(10-11):2349-60 - PubMed
  3. Water Environ Res. 2003 Nov-Dec;75(6):485-98 - PubMed
  4. Water Res. 2015 Oct 15;83:354-66 - PubMed
  5. Microbiology. 2002 Nov;148(Pt 11):3353-64 - PubMed
  6. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007 Jun 15;97(3):483-95 - PubMed
  7. Water Res. 2005 Aug;39(13):2901-14 - PubMed
  8. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 Sep;65(9):4077-84 - PubMed
  9. Water Environ Res. 2003 Nov-Dec;75(6):499-511 - PubMed
  10. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 Mar;65(3):1251-8 - PubMed
  11. Chemosphere. 2013 Aug;92(10):1314-20 - PubMed
  12. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Sep;70(9):5383-90 - PubMed
  13. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015 Apr;99(8):3659-72 - PubMed
  14. Water Res. 2007 Jun;41(11):2271-300 - PubMed
  15. Syst Appl Microbiol. 1999 Sep;22(3):434-44 - PubMed
  16. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2001;76(1):17-31 - PubMed
  17. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000 Mar;66(3):1175-82 - PubMed
  18. Bioresour Technol. 2012 Aug;118:518-25 - PubMed
  19. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 Jun;56(6):1919-25 - PubMed
  20. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2003 Jan 5;81(1):92-105 - PubMed
  21. Water Res. 2008 May;42(10-11):2361-8 - PubMed
  22. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2008 Oct 1;101(2):295-306 - PubMed
  23. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Jun;68(6):2763-9 - PubMed
  24. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1994 Mar 15;43(6):461-70 - PubMed
  25. Water Res. 2010 Sep;44(17):4908-23 - PubMed
  26. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2009 Dec;1(6):583-588 - PubMed
  27. Syst Appl Microbiol. 1999 Sep;22(3):454-65 - PubMed
  28. Water Res. 2012 Apr 15;46(6):1889-900 - PubMed
  29. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 May;61(5):1910-6 - PubMed
  30. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014 Sep;98(17):7609-22 - PubMed

Publication Types