Display options
Cite
Trujillo A, Feixas G, Bados A, et al. Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - Outcome Measure. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016;12:1457-66doi: 10.2147/NDT.S103079.
Trujillo, A., Feixas, G., Bados, A., García-Grau, E., Salla, M., Medina, J. C., Montesano, A., Soriano, J., Medeiros-Ferreira, L., Cañete, J., Corbella, S., Grau, A., Lana, F., & Evans, C. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - Outcome Measure. Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 121457-66. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S103079
Trujillo, Adriana, et al. "Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - Outcome Measure." Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment vol. 12 (2016): 1457-66. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S103079
Trujillo A, Feixas G, Bados A, García-Grau E, Salla M, Medina JC, Montesano A, Soriano J, Medeiros-Ferreira L, Cañete J, Corbella S, Grau A, Lana F, Evans C. Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - Outcome Measure. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016 Jun 21;12:1457-66. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S103079. eCollection 2016. PMID: 27382288; PMCID: PMC4922811.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016 Jun 21;12:1457-66. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S103079. eCollection 2016.

Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - Outcome Measure.

Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment

Adriana Trujillo, Guillem Feixas, Arturo Bados, Eugeni García-Grau, Marta Salla, Joan Carles Medina, Adrián Montesano, José Soriano, Leticia Medeiros-Ferreira, Josep Cañete, Sergi Corbella, Antoni Grau, Fernando Lana, Chris Evans

Affiliations

  1. Department of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatments, Faculty of Psychology; Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, University of Barcelona.
  2. Department of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatments, Faculty of Psychology.
  3. Hospital of the Holy Cross and Saint Paul.
  4. Nou Barris Mental Health Center, Barcelona.
  5. Hospital of Mataró, Sanitary Consortium of Maresme, Mataró
  6. FPCEE, Blanquerna, Universitat Ramon Llull.
  7. Institute of Eating Disorders, Barcelona.
  8. MAR Health Park, CAEMIL, Santa Coloma de Gramenet, Spain.
  9. East London NHS Foundation Trust, NPDDNet, London, UK.

PMID: 27382288 PMCID: PMC4922811 DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S103079

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to assess the reliability and validity of the Spanish translation of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - Outcome Measure, a 34-item self-report questionnaire that measures the client's status in the domains of Subjective well-being, Problems/Symptoms, Life functioning, and Risk.

METHOD: Six hundred and forty-four adult participants were included in two samples: the clinical sample (n=192) from different mental health and primary care centers; and the nonclinical sample (n=452), which included a student and a community sample.

RESULTS: The questionnaire showed good acceptability and internal consistency, appropriate test-retest reliability, and acceptable convergent validity. Strong differentiation between clinical and nonclinical samples was found. As expected, the Risk domain had different characteristics than other domains, but all findings were comparable with the UK referential data. Cutoff scores were calculated for clinical significant change assessment.

CONCLUSION: The Spanish version of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - Outcome Measure showed acceptable psychometric properties, providing support for using the questionnaire for monitoring the progress of Spanish-speaking psychotherapy clients.

Keywords: CORE-OM; outcome measure; psychometric validation; reliability; validity

References

  1. Br J Psychiatry. 2006 Nov;189:410-5 - PubMed
  2. Br J Clin Psychol. 2006 Jun;45(Pt 2):185-203 - PubMed
  3. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005 Feb;73(1):59-67 - PubMed
  4. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003 Feb;71(1):14-21 - PubMed
  5. J Affect Disord. 2014 Dec;169:157-64 - PubMed
  6. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001 Apr;69(2):184-96 - PubMed
  7. Br J Psychiatry. 2000 Aug;177:123-30 - PubMed
  8. J Affect Disord. 2007 Aug;101(1-3):27-34 - PubMed
  9. Br J Psychiatry. 2007 Jan;190:69-74 - PubMed
  10. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2015 Jan-Feb;22(1):64-74 - PubMed
  11. Depress Anxiety. 2016 Sep;33(9):862-9 - PubMed
  12. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):444-9 - PubMed
  13. Nord J Psychiatry. 2016;70(1):16-23 - PubMed
  14. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2013 Sep-Oct;20(5):447-55 - PubMed
  15. Br J Psychiatry. 2015 Aug;207 (2):115-22 - PubMed
  16. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991 Feb;59(1):12-9 - PubMed
  17. Nord J Psychiatry. 2013 Oct;67(5):305-11 - PubMed
  18. Br J Psychiatry. 2005 Mar;186:239-46 - PubMed
  19. Aging Ment Health. 2005 May;9(3):235-45 - PubMed
  20. Laeknabladid. 2015 Nov;101(11):519-24 - PubMed
  21. Br J Psychiatry. 2002 Jan;180:51-60 - PubMed
  22. Behav Res Ther. 2014 Aug;59:1-11 - PubMed
  23. Psychol Med. 2008 Feb;38(2):279-87 - PubMed

Publication Types