J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2016 Jul;4(3):135-40.
Effects of structured written feedback by cards on medical students' performance at Mini Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) in an outpatient clinic.
Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism
Fariba Haghani, Mohammad Hatef Khorami, Mohammad Fakhari
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Medical Education, Medical Education Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran;
- Department of Urology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran;
- Medical Education Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
PMID: 27382581
PMCID: PMC4927256
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Feedback cards are recommended as a feasible tool for structured written feedback delivery in clinical education while effectiveness of this tool on the medical students' performance is still questionable. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of structured written feedback by cards as well as verbal feedback versus verbal feedback alone on the clinical performance of medical students at the Mini Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) test in an outpatient clinic.
METHODS: This is a quasi-experimental study with pre- and post-test comprising four groups in two terms of medical students' externship. The students' performance was assessed through the Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) as a clinical performance evaluation tool. Structured written feedbacks were given to two experimental groups by designed feedback cards as well as verbal feedback, while in the two control groups feedback was delivered verbally as a routine approach in clinical education.
RESULTS: By consecutive sampling method, 62 externship students were enrolled in this study and seven students were excluded from the final analysis due to their absence for three days. According to the ANOVA analysis and Post Hoc Tukey test, no statistically significant difference was observed among the four groups at the pre-test, whereas a statistically significant difference was observed between the experimental and control groups at the post-test (F = 4.023, p =0.012). The effect size of the structured written feedbacks on clinical performance was 0.19.
CONCLUSION: Structured written feedback by cards could improve the performance of medical students in a statistical sense. Further studies must be conducted in other clinical courses with longer durations.
Keywords: Ambulatory care; Feedback; Medical education; Outpatient clinics
References
- Acad Med. 2003 Aug;78(8):826-30 - PubMed
- Ambul Pediatr. 2007 Nov-Dec;7(6):449-52 - PubMed
- Ambul Pediatr. 2003 Jan-Feb;3(1):9-11 - PubMed
- Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2015 Aug;20(3):803-16 - PubMed
- Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jun;196(6):508-13 - PubMed
- Med Educ. 2008 Feb;42(2):189-97 - PubMed
- South Med J. 2004 Dec;97(12):1174-8 - PubMed
- Med Educ. 2008 Nov;42(11):1071-9 - PubMed
- Med J Aust. 2008 Aug 4;189(3):159-61 - PubMed
- Acad Med. 2003 Oct;78(10 Suppl):S33-5 - PubMed
- Acad Psychiatry. 2006 Jul-Aug;30(4):319-24 - PubMed
- J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Jan;24(1):74-9 - PubMed
- J Surg Res. 2008 May 1;146(1):1-2 - PubMed
- Med Teach. 2007 Nov;29(9):855-71 - PubMed
- CJEM. 2008 Jan;10(1):44-50 - PubMed
- Med Educ. 2010 Jan;44(1):16-7 - PubMed
- J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2012;9:10 - PubMed
- Med Educ. 2006 May;40(5):450-8 - PubMed
- J Surg Res. 2007 Jun 1;140(1):139-48 - PubMed
- Clin Teach. 2014 Jul;11(4):279-83 - PubMed
- Am J Surg. 2002 Mar;183(3):300-4 - PubMed
- J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Aug;20(8):743-7 - PubMed
Publication Types