Display options
Share it on

Ann Transl Med. 2016 Jun;4(11):212. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.05.55.

Elevated d-dimer cut-off values for computed tomography pulmonary angiography-d-dimer correlates with location of embolism.

Annals of translational medicine

Mateuzs Piotr Kubak, Peter Mæhre Lauritzen, Arne Borthne, Espen Asak Ruud, Haseem Ashraf

Affiliations

  1. 1 Department of Radiology, Akershus University Hospital, Postboks 1000, 1478 Lørenskog, Norway ; 2 Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Akershus University Hospital, Att: Campus Ahus, Postboks 1000, 1478 Lørenskog, Norway ; 3 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Gentofte University Hospital, Kildegårdsvej 28, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark.

PMID: 27386486 PMCID: PMC4916352 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2016.05.55

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute pulmonary embolism (APE) is a potentially fatal condition, and making a timely diagnosis can be challenging. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) has become the modality of choice, and this contributes to the increasing load on emergency room CT scanners. Our purpose was to investigate whether an elevated d-dimer cut-off could reduce the demand for CTPA while maintaining a high sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV).

METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients referred for CTPA with suspicion of APE in 2012, and collected d-dimer values and CTPA results. We investigated the diagnostic performance of d-dimer using a 0.5 mg/L cut-off and an age adjusted cut-off. We also evaluated a new and elevated cut-off. Cases were categorized according to their CTPA result into: no embolism, peripheral embolism, lobar embolism and central embolism. Finally we investigated a possible correlation between d-dimer values and location of embolism.

RESULTS: We included 1,051 CTPAs, from which 216 (21%) showed pulmonary embolism. There were concomitant d-dimer analyses in 822 CTPA examinations. The current 0.5 mg/L cut-off achieved a sensitivity and NPV of 99%. The age-adjusted cut-off achieved a sensitivity and NPV of 98%, and our suggested cut-off of 0.9 mg/L achieved a sensitivity and NPV of 97%.

CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the elevated d-dimer cut-off of 0.9 mg/L achieved a high sensitivity and NPV, while reducing the number of CTPA by 27%. The correlation between d-dimer values and location of embolisms supports the suggestion of an elevated d-dimer value.

Keywords: Computed tomography; pulmonary embolism; sensitivity

References

  1. Eur Heart J. 2008 Sep;29(18):2276-315 - PubMed
  2. Arch Intern Med. 2009 Nov 23;169(21):1961-5 - PubMed
  3. Thromb Haemost. 2000 May;83(5):657-60 - PubMed
  4. Crit Care Med. 2007 Aug;35(8):1937-41 - PubMed
  5. Arch Intern Med. 2011 May 9;171(9):831-7 - PubMed
  6. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2012 Jan-Feb;18(1):20-6 - PubMed
  7. Eur Radiol. 2011 Sep;21(9):1914-21 - PubMed
  8. Thromb Haemost. 1980 Dec 19;44(3):146-9 - PubMed
  9. Radiology. 2007 Nov;245(2):315-29 - PubMed
  10. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Jul;3(4):491-500 - PubMed
  11. Thromb Haemost. 2000 Mar;83(3):416-20 - PubMed
  12. JAMA. 2003 Aug 27;290(8):1071-4 - PubMed
  13. Thromb Haemost. 2007 Oct;98(4):756-64 - PubMed
  14. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999 Jan;172(1):107-12 - PubMed
  15. Radiology. 2000 Nov;217(2):447-55 - PubMed
  16. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Jul;21(7):722-7 - PubMed
  17. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2016 Apr;41(3):482-92 - PubMed
  18. Thromb Res. 2010 Oct;126(4):e266-70 - PubMed
  19. Exp Clin Cardiol. 2013 Spring;18(2):129-38 - PubMed
  20. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jun 1;354(22):2317-27 - PubMed
  21. Acad Radiol. 2006 Apr;13(4):434-46 - PubMed
  22. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2008 Mar;19(2):153-8 - PubMed
  23. Int Angiol. 2016 Feb;35(1):62-70 - PubMed
  24. JAMA. 2014 Mar 19;311(11):1117-24 - PubMed
  25. Clin Radiol. 2008 Apr;63(4):381-6 - PubMed
  26. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Feb 1;165(3):345-8 - PubMed
  27. PLoS One. 2015 Dec 14;10(12):e0145012 - PubMed

Publication Types