Display options
Cite
Davies L, Fradera R, Riesch H, et al. Surveying the citizen science landscape: an exploration of the design, delivery and impact of citizen science through the lens of the Open Air Laboratories (OPAL) programme. BMC Ecol. 2016;16:17doi: 10.1186/s12898-016-0066-z.
Davies, L., Fradera, R., Riesch, H., & Lakeman-Fraser, P. (2016). Surveying the citizen science landscape: an exploration of the design, delivery and impact of citizen science through the lens of the Open Air Laboratories (OPAL) programme. BMC ecology, 1617. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-016-0066-z
Davies, Linda, et al. "Surveying the citizen science landscape: an exploration of the design, delivery and impact of citizen science through the lens of the Open Air Laboratories (OPAL) programme." BMC ecology vol. 16 (2016): 17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-016-0066-z
Davies L, Fradera R, Riesch H, Lakeman-Fraser P. Surveying the citizen science landscape: an exploration of the design, delivery and impact of citizen science through the lens of the Open Air Laboratories (OPAL) programme. BMC Ecol. 2016 Jul 22;16:17. doi: 10.1186/s12898-016-0066-z. PMID: 27460098; PMCID: PMC4965714.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

BMC Ecol. 2016 Jul 22;16:17. doi: 10.1186/s12898-016-0066-z.

Surveying the citizen science landscape: an exploration of the design, delivery and impact of citizen science through the lens of the Open Air Laboratories (OPAL) programme.

BMC ecology

Linda Davies, Roger Fradera, Hauke Riesch, Poppy Lakeman-Fraser

Affiliations

  1. Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, SW7 1NA, UK. [email protected].
  2. Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, SW7 1NA, UK.
  3. Department of Social Sciences, Media and Communications, Brunel University, London, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH, UK.

PMID: 27460098 PMCID: PMC4965714 DOI: 10.1186/s12898-016-0066-z

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This paper provides a short introduction to the topic of citizen science (CS) identifying the shift from the knowledge deficit model to more inclusive, participatory science. It acknowledges the benefits of new technology and the opportunities it brings for mass participation and data manipulation. It focuses on the increase in interest in CS in recent years and draws on experience gained from the Open Air Laboratories (OPAL) programme launched in England in 2007.

METHODS: The drivers and objectives for OPAL are presented together with background information on the partnership, methods and scales. The approaches used by researchers ranged from direct public participation in mass data collection through field surveys to research with minimal public engagement. The supporting services focused on education, particularly to support participants new to science, a media strategy and data services.

RESULTS: Examples from OPAL are used to illustrate the different approaches to the design and delivery of CS that have emerged over recent years and the breadth of opportunities for public participation the current landscape provides. Qualitative and quantitative data from OPAL are used as evidence of the impact of CS.

CONCLUSION: While OPAL was conceived ahead of the more recent formalisation of approaches to the design, delivery and analysis of CS projects and their impact, it nevertheless provides a range of examples against which to assess the various benefits and challenges emerging in this fast developing field.

References

  1. Zookeys. 2015 Feb 02;(480):125-46 - PubMed
  2. Environ Pollut. 2013 Nov;182:437-47 - PubMed
  3. BMC Ecol. 2016 Jul 22;16 Suppl 1:14 - PubMed
  4. BMC Ecol. 2016 Jul 22;16 Suppl 1:13 - PubMed
  5. BMC Ecol. 2016 Jul 22;16 Suppl 1:16 - PubMed
  6. Med Soc (Berkeley). 1996;:1-466 - PubMed
  7. Ecol Evol. 2013 Dec;3(16):5268-78 - PubMed
  8. Environ Pollut. 2013 Nov;182:448-51 - PubMed
  9. Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23 (1):107-20 - PubMed
  10. Environ Pollut. 2011 Aug-Sep;159(8-9):2203-10 - PubMed
  11. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 22;9(1):e86226 - PubMed
  12. BMC Ecol. 2016 Jul 22;16 Suppl 1:15 - PubMed
  13. Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Sep;24(9):467-71 - PubMed
  14. Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Apr 3;46(7):3687-96 - PubMed
  15. Environ Pollut. 2015 Mar;198:201-10 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types