Display options
Cite
Liechty JM, Bi X, Qu A. Feasibility and validity of a statistical adjustment to reduce self-report bias of height and weight in wave 1 of the Add Health study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16(1):124doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0227-y.
Liechty, J. M., Bi, X., & Qu, A. (2016). Feasibility and validity of a statistical adjustment to reduce self-report bias of height and weight in wave 1 of the Add Health study. BMC medical research methodology, 16(1), 124. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0227-y
Liechty, Janet M, et al. "Feasibility and validity of a statistical adjustment to reduce self-report bias of height and weight in wave 1 of the Add Health study." BMC medical research methodology vol. 16,1 (2016): 124. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0227-y
Liechty JM, Bi X, Qu A. Feasibility and validity of a statistical adjustment to reduce self-report bias of height and weight in wave 1 of the Add Health study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Sep 22;16(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0227-y. PMID: 27658820; PMCID: PMC5034522.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Sep 22;16(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0227-y.

Feasibility and validity of a statistical adjustment to reduce self-report bias of height and weight in wave 1 of the Add Health study.

BMC medical research methodology

Janet M Liechty, Xuan Bi, Annie Qu

Affiliations

  1. School of Social Work, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1010 W. Nevada, MC-082, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA. [email protected].
  2. College of Medicine, University of Illinois, 506 S. Mathews, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA. [email protected].
  3. Department of Statistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 725 S. Wright, Champaign, IL, 61820, USA.
  4. Illinois Statistical Office, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 725 S. Wright, Champaign, IL, 61820, USA.

PMID: 27658820 PMCID: PMC5034522 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-016-0227-y

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bias in adolescent self-reported height and weight is well documented. Given the importance and widespread use of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health) data for obesity research, we developed and tested the feasibility and validity of an empirically derived statistical correction for self-report bias in wave 1 (W1) of Add Health, a large panel study in the United States.

METHODS: Participants in grades 7-12 with complete height and weight data at W1 were included (n = 20,175). We used measured and self-reported (SR) height and weight and relevant biopsychosocial factors from wave 2 (W2) of Add Health (n = 14,190) to identify sources of bias and derive the most efficient sex-specific estimates of corrected height and weight. Measured, SR, and corrected W2 BMI values were calculated and compared, including sensitivity and specificity. Final correction equations were applied to W1.

RESULTS: After correction, weight status misclassification rates among those who underestimated their weight status were reduced from 6.6 to 5.7 % for males and from 8.0 to 5.6 % for females compared to self-report; and the correlation between SR and measured BMI in W2 increased slightly from 0.92 to 0.93. Among females, correction procedures resulted in a 3.4 % increase in sensitivity to detect overweight/obesity (BMI ≥ 25) and 5.9 % increase in sensitivity for obesity (BMI ≥ 30).

CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that application of the proposed statistical corrections can reduce bias of self-report height and weight in W1 of the Add Health data and may be useful in some analyses. In particular, the corrected BMI values improve sensitivity --the ability to detect a true positive-for overweight/obesity among females, which addresses a major concern about self-report bias in obesity research. However, the correction does not improve sensitivity to identify underweight or healthy weight adolescents and so should be applied selectively based on research questions.

Keywords: Add Health; Body mass index; Epidemiology; Obesity; Overweight; Self-report bias; Self-report vs. measured; Self-reported weight; Statistical adjustment; Statistical correction

References

  1. Prev Med. 2001 Sep;33(3):179-89 - PubMed
  2. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013 Apr;21(4):856-60 - PubMed
  3. Int J Obes (Lond). 2012 Feb;36(2):286-94 - PubMed
  4. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2008 Dec;32(6):542-5 - PubMed
  5. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007 Sep;15(9):2357-64 - PubMed
  6. BMC Res Notes. 2011 Oct 17;4:414 - PubMed
  7. Vital Health Stat 11. 2002 May;(246):1-190 - PubMed
  8. Med Care. 1993 Mar;31(3):247-63 - PubMed
  9. Pediatrics. 2000 Jul;106(1 Pt 1):52-8 - PubMed
  10. Obes Facts. 2015;8(1):30-42 - PubMed
  11. J Adolesc Health. 2013 Sep;53(3):322-7 - PubMed
  12. Eur J Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;26(4):253-4 - PubMed
  13. BMC Res Notes. 2014 Mar 27;7:181 - PubMed
  14. BMC Public Health. 2009 Nov 19;9:421 - PubMed
  15. Obes Rev. 2007 Jul;8(4):307-26 - PubMed
  16. J Res Adolesc. 2016 Mar 1;26(1):45-59 - PubMed
  17. Obes Facts. 2010 Jun;3(3):181-90 - PubMed
  18. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Dec;161(12):1154-61 - PubMed
  19. J Adolesc Health. 2005 Nov;37(5):371-5 - PubMed
  20. Popul Health Metr. 2009 Jan 06;7:2 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support