Display options
Share it on

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 14;9:CD004002. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004002.pub3.

Compression stockings for preventing deep vein thrombosis in airline passengers.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews

Mike J Clarke, Cathryn Broderick, Sally Hopewell, Ed Juszczak, Anne Eisinga

Affiliations

  1. Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Block B, Royal Victoria Hospital, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK, BT12 6BJ.

PMID: 27624857 PMCID: PMC6457834 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004002.pub3

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Air travel might increase the risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). It has been suggested that wearing compression stockings might reduce this risk. This is an update of the review first published in 2006.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of wearing compression stockings versus not wearing them for preventing DVT in people travelling on flights lasting at least four hours.

SEARCH METHODS: For this update the Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist (CIS) searched the Specialised Register (10 February 2016). In addition, the CIS searched the Cochrane Register of Studies (CENTRAL (2016, Issue 1)).

SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of compression stockings versus no stockings in passengers on flights lasting at least four hours. Trials in which passengers wore a stocking on one leg but not the other, or those comparing stockings and another intervention were also eligible.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion and extracted data. We sought additional information from trialists where necessary.

MAIN RESULTS: One new study that fulfilled the inclusion criteria was identified for this update. Eleven randomised trials (n = 2906) were included in this review: nine (n = 2821) compared wearing graduated compression stockings on both legs versus not wearing them; one trial (n = 50) compared wearing graduated compression tights versus not wearing them; and one trial (n = 35) compared wearing a graduated compression stocking on one leg for the outbound flight and on the other leg on the return flight. Eight trials included people judged to be at low or medium risk of developing DVT (n = 1598) and two included high-risk participants (n = 1273). All flights had a duration of more than five hours.Fifty of 2637 participants with follow-up data available in the trials of wearing compression stockings on both legs had a symptomless DVT; three wore stockings, 47 did not (odds ratio (OR) 0.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04 to 0.25, P < 0.001; high-quality evidence). There were no symptomless DVTs in three trials. Sixteen of 1804 people developed superficial vein thrombosis, four wore stockings, 12 did not (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.13, P = 0.09; moderate-quality evidence). No deaths, pulmonary emboli or symptomatic DVTs were reported. Wearing stockings had a significant impact in reducing oedema (mean difference (MD) -4.72, 95% CI -4.91 to -4.52; based on six trials; low-quality evidence). A further two trials showed reduced oedema in the stockings group but could not be included in the meta-analysis as they used different methods to measure oedema. No significant adverse effects were reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is high-quality evidence that airline passengers similar to those in this review can expect a substantial reduction in the incidence of symptomless DVT and low-quality evidence that leg oedema is reduced if they wear compression stockings. Quality was limited by the way that oedema was measured. There is moderate-quality evidence that superficial vein thrombosis may be reduced if passengers wear compression stockings. We cannot assess the effect of wearing stockings on death, pulmonary embolism or symptomatic DVT because no such events occurred in these trials. Randomised trials to assess these outcomes would need to include a very large number of people.

References

  1. Int J Clin Pract. 2001 Dec;55(10):690-3 - PubMed
  2. JAMA. 1998 Apr 8;279(14):1094-9 - PubMed
  3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19;(2):CD004002 - PubMed
  4. Angiology. 2003 Jan;54(1):1-9 - PubMed
  5. Orv Hetil. 2001 Nov 11;142(45):2469-73 - PubMed
  6. Lancet. 2001 May 12;357(9267):1485-9 - PubMed
  7. Angiology. 2002 Nov-Dec;53(6):635-45 - PubMed
  8. BMJ. 2004 Jun 19;328(7454):1490 - PubMed
  9. Med J Aust. 2008 Jan 21;188(2):81-4 - PubMed
  10. J Intern Med. 2007 Dec;262(6):615-34 - PubMed
  11. Stat Med. 2004 May 15;23(9):1351-75 - PubMed
  12. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1992 Jan;26(1):47-9 - PubMed
  13. Angiology. 2003 Mar-Apr;54(2):143-54 - PubMed
  14. Br J Dis Chest. 1977 Apr;71(2):138-40 - PubMed
  15. J Travel Med. 2005 May-Jun;12(3):142-54 - PubMed
  16. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 14;9:CD004002 - PubMed
  17. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 1999 Oct;93(7):503-7 - PubMed
  18. Am J Emerg Med. 2002 Jul;20(4):378-80 - PubMed
  19. Arch Intern Med. 1998 Mar 23;158(6):585-93 - PubMed
  20. N Engl J Med. 1954 Jan 28;250(4):148-9 - PubMed
  21. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 17;(12):CD001484 - PubMed
  22. Am J Med. 2013 Sep;126(9):832.e13-21 - PubMed
  23. J Adv Nurs. 2005 Jul;51(1):83-98 - PubMed
  24. BMJ. 2001 Jan 27;322(7280):188 - PubMed
  25. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2003 Jul;9(3):197-201 - PubMed
  26. PLoS Med. 2006 Aug;3(8):e307 - PubMed
  27. Cardiovasc Surg. 2001 Apr;9(2):159-61 - PubMed
  28. J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Jan;22(1):107-14 - PubMed
  29. Angiology. 2001 Jun;52(6):369-74 - PubMed
  30. J Thromb Haemost. 2007 Jul;5(7):1556-67 - PubMed
  31. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2016 Jan;41(1):3-14 - PubMed
  32. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2004 May 19;4:7 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support