Display options
Share it on

Br Dent J. 2016 Sep 23;221(6):323-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.683.

An investigation of the clinical experiences of dentists within the national dental foundation training programme in the North West of England.

British dental journal

N O A Palmer, J A Kirton, D Speechley

Affiliations

  1. Department of Postgraduate Dentistry, Liverpool.
  2. Edgehill University, Ormskirk.

PMID: 27659636 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.683

Abstract

Objective To investigate the clinical experiences of foundation dentists (FDs) in the North West of England.Methods Three research methods were used: a questionnaire completed by FDs at the end of their training; an analysis of the clinical logs of experience recorded in the educational portfolios; and analysis of NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) activity data for the 12 month period of training of FDs.Results A response rate of 100% (N = 50) was achieved for the questionnaire and complete data for 49 of the 50 FDs was available from the NHSBSA and clinical logs in the educational portfolios.Discussion Trainees were satisfied with the clinical experience and believed their workload and patient mix provided a broad experience of clinical conditions, although 40% felt there were gaps in their clinical experience. There were wide ranges in the number of individual clinical procedures performed by FDs with some providing very few endodontic treatments, crowns, bridges, metal dentures and fissure sealants. There was a statistically significant difference (P <0.0005) in self- reporting of procedures recorded in the portfolio log when compared to the NHSBSA data.Conclusion The results from this study suggest that there is satisfaction amongst FDs with FT, but there is wide range in the level of clinical experience amongst FDs with some gaps which need to be addressed. In order to provide a consistent, cost effective approach to the delivery of FT changes are required to ensure minimum levels of clinical procedures are achieved during FT. The information collected in the training portfolio must be robust in order to make valid judgements on progress.

References

  1. Med Educ. 2002 Oct;36(10):899-900 - PubMed
  2. Med Teach. 2010;32(7):e294-9 - PubMed
  3. Br Dent J. 2001 Sep 8;191(5):265-70 - PubMed
  4. Br Dent J. 2013 Mar;214(6):305-9 - PubMed
  5. Med Teach. 2013 Jun;35(6):e1181-96 - PubMed
  6. BMC Med Educ. 2014 Sep 20;14:197 - PubMed
  7. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Feb;19(2):131-41 - PubMed
  8. Br Dent J. 2000 Jul 22;189(2):101-6 - PubMed
  9. Med Educ. 2006 May;40(5):450-8 - PubMed
  10. Fam Pract. 2011 Jun;28(3):287-93 - PubMed
  11. Fam Med. 2002 Jun;34(6):451-4 - PubMed
  12. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000 Aug;38(4):320-5 - PubMed
  13. Med Educ. 2007 Jan;41(1):84-91 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types