Display options
Cite
Okada T, Takahashi H, Suzuki Y, et al. Comparative analysis of transcriptomes in aerial stems and roots of Ephedra sinica based on high-throughput mRNA sequencing. Genom Data. 2016;10:4-11doi: 10.1016/j.gdata.2016.08.003.
Okada, T., Takahashi, H., Suzuki, Y., Sugano, S., Noji, M., Kenmoku, H., Toyota, M., Kanaya, S., Kawahara, N., Asakawa, Y., & Sekita, S. (2016). Comparative analysis of transcriptomes in aerial stems and roots of Ephedra sinica based on high-throughput mRNA sequencing. Genomics data, 104-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gdata.2016.08.003
Okada, Taketo, et al. "Comparative analysis of transcriptomes in aerial stems and roots of Ephedra sinica based on high-throughput mRNA sequencing." Genomics data vol. 10 (2016): 4-11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gdata.2016.08.003
Okada T, Takahashi H, Suzuki Y, Sugano S, Noji M, Kenmoku H, Toyota M, Kanaya S, Kawahara N, Asakawa Y, Sekita S. Comparative analysis of transcriptomes in aerial stems and roots of Ephedra sinica based on high-throughput mRNA sequencing. Genom Data. 2016 Aug 04;10:4-11. doi: 10.1016/j.gdata.2016.08.003. eCollection 2016 Dec. PMID: 27625990; PMCID: PMC5011178.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Genom Data. 2016 Aug 04;10:4-11. doi: 10.1016/j.gdata.2016.08.003. eCollection 2016 Dec.

Comparative analysis of transcriptomes in aerial stems and roots of Ephedra sinica based on high-throughput mRNA sequencing.

Genomics data

Taketo Okada, Hironobu Takahashi, Yutaka Suzuki, Sumio Sugano, Masaaki Noji, Hiromichi Kenmoku, Masao Toyota, Shigehiko Kanaya, Nobuo Kawahara, Yoshinori Asakawa, Setsuko Sekita

Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences at Kagawa Campus, Tokushima Bunri University, Sanuki, Kagawa 769-2193, Japan.
  2. Institute of Pharmacognosy, Tokushima Bunri University, Tokushima 770-8514, Japan.
  3. Department of Medical Genome Sciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, the University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8562, Japan.
  4. Department of Medical Genome Sciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, the University of Tokyo, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan.
  5. Graduate School of Information Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Nara 630-0192, Japan.
  6. Tsukuba Division, Research Center for Medicinal Plant Resources, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0843, Japan.

PMID: 27625990 PMCID: PMC5011178 DOI: 10.1016/j.gdata.2016.08.003

Abstract

Ephedra plants are taxonomically classified as gymnosperms, and are medicinally important as the botanical origin of crude drugs and as bioresources that contain pharmacologically active chemicals. Here we show a comparative analysis of the transcriptomes of aerial stems and roots of Ephedra sinica based on high-throughput mRNA sequencing by RNA-Seq. De novo assembly of short cDNA sequence reads generated 23,358, 13,373, and 28,579 contigs longer than 200 bases from aerial stems, roots, or both aerial stems and roots, respectively. The presumed functions encoded by these contig sequences were annotated by BLAST (blastx). Subsequently, these contigs were classified based on gene ontology slims, Enzyme Commission numbers, and the InterPro database. Furthermore, comparative gene expression analysis was performed between aerial stems and roots. These transcriptome analyses revealed differences and similarities between the transcriptomes of aerial stems and roots in E. sinica. Deep transcriptome sequencing of Ephedra should open the door to molecular biological studies based on the entire transcriptome, tissue- or organ-specific transcriptomes, or targeted genes of interest.

Keywords: Comparative transcriptome analysis; EC, Enzyme Commission; Ephedra sinica; Es_R, E. sinica roots; Es_S, E. sinica aerial stems; Es_SR, E. sinica combined aerial stems and roots; GO, gene ontology; High-throughput mRNA sequencing; IPR, InterPro; RNA-Seq

References

  1. Nat Rev Genet. 2009 Jan;10(1):57-63 - PubMed
  2. Planta Med. 2008 Dec;74(15):1823-5 - PubMed
  3. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Jul 1;33(Web Server issue):W116-20 - PubMed
  4. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2003 Feb;5(1):55-67 - PubMed
  5. Amino Acids. 2016 May;48(5):1209-20 - PubMed
  6. Biol Pharm Bull. 2011;34(5):717-26 - PubMed
  7. Planta Med. 1983 Aug;48(4):290-3 - PubMed
  8. BMC Genomics. 2010 Nov 24;11:663 - PubMed
  9. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Jun;36(10):3420-35 - PubMed
  10. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 25;10(3):e0119701 - PubMed
  11. Bioinformatics. 2009 May 1;25(9):1105-11 - PubMed
  12. Planta Med. 1983 Jun;48(2):108-10 - PubMed
  13. Trends Plant Sci. 2012 Jul;17(7):404-12 - PubMed
  14. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1992 Jan 22;1098(3):275-335 - PubMed
  15. Nat Biotechnol. 2010 May;28(5):511-5 - PubMed
  16. Am J Bot. 2001 Jul;88(7):1199-208 - PubMed
  17. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Nov 23;101(47):16571-6 - PubMed
  18. Bioinformatics. 2005 Sep 15;21(18):3674-6 - PubMed
  19. Planta Med. 1984 Dec;50(6):478-80 - PubMed
  20. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Jan;40(Database issue):D306-12 - PubMed
  21. Phytochemistry. 2012 Sep;81:71-9 - PubMed
  22. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Oct 07;11:498 - PubMed
  23. Methods. 2009 Jul;48(3):249-57 - PubMed
  24. Phytother Res. 2003 Aug;17(7):703-12 - PubMed
  25. Mitochondrial DNA. 2015 Dec 29;:1-2 - PubMed
  26. Nat Protoc. 2012 Mar 01;7(3):562-78 - PubMed
  27. Planta Med. 1993 Aug;59(4):376-8 - PubMed
  28. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D530-5 - PubMed
  29. Biol Pharm Bull. 2009 Sep;32(9):1621-3 - PubMed
  30. Int J Plant Genomics. 2008;2008:619832 - PubMed
  31. Biol Pharm Bull. 2008 Dec;31(12):2194-9 - PubMed
  32. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56243 - PubMed
  33. Planta Med. 1978 Nov;34(3):291-3 - PubMed

Publication Types