Display options
Share it on

J Chiropr Med. 2016 Sep;15(3):197-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 Jun 20.

Effect of TENS Versus Placebo on Walking Capacity in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Journal of chiropractic medicine

Carlo Ammendolia, Pierre Côté, Y Raja Rampersaud, Danielle Southerst, Brian Budgell, Claire Bombardier, Gillian Hawker

Affiliations

  1. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Rebecca MacDonald Centre for Arthritis & Autoimmune Disease, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada; Graduate Studies, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Canada.
  2. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, ON, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
  3. Department of Orthopedics, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
  4. Division of Graduate Studies, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Canada.
  5. Division of Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Canada.
  6. Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

PMID: 27660596 PMCID: PMC5021899 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.04.001

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a growing health problem and a leading cause of disability and loss of independence in older adults. It is usually caused by age-related degenerative narrowing of the spinal canals leading to compression and ischemia of the spinal nerves and symptoms of neurogenic claudication. Limited walking ability is the dominant functional impairment caused by LSS. Animal studies suggest increased blood flow to the spinal nerves and spinal cord with superficial paraspinal electrical stimulation. The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of paraspinal transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) applied while walking on walking ability in patients with LSS.

METHODS/DESIGN: We propose to conduct a 2-arm double-blinded (participant and assessor) randomized controlled trial. We will recruit individuals who have limited walking ability due to degenerative LSS from hospital specialists, community physicians, and chiropractors located in the city of Toronto, Canada. Eligible consenting participants will be randomly assigned to either paraspinal TENS or placebo paraspinal TENS applied while walking. The primary outcome will be walking distance measured during a single self-paced walking test. We will calculate the differences in proportions among participants in both groups who achieve at least a 30% improvement in walking distance from baseline using Pearson χ (2) test with 95% confidence intervals.

DISCUSSION: Effective nonoperative interventions for LSS are unknown. Interventions that can improve blood flow to the spinal nerves while walking may increase walking ability in this population. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation is a low-cost intervention that may have the potential to achieve this objective. To our knowledge, this study will be the first clinical trial to assess the effects of TENS on walking ability of patients with LSS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02592642.

Keywords: Clinical protocol; Intermittent claudication; Randomized controlled trial; Spinal stenosis; Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation; Walking

References

  1. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 30;(8):CD010712 - PubMed
  2. Can J Anaesth. 2010 Jul;57(7):694-703 - PubMed
  3. Spine J. 2010 Jul;10(7):588-94 - PubMed
  4. Pain. 1979 Oct;7(2):115-27 - PubMed
  5. JAMA. 2010 Dec 15;304(23):2628-36 - PubMed
  6. World J Orthop. 2014 Apr 18;5(2):134-45 - PubMed
  7. Pain. 1995 Apr;61(1):39-45 - PubMed
  8. Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9 - PubMed
  9. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988 Nov;13(11):1278-83 - PubMed
  10. J Pain. 2010 Mar;11(3):230-8 - PubMed
  11. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Nov 1;35(23):2097-102 - PubMed
  12. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Jun 15;25(12):1509-14 - PubMed
  13. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Oct 15;34(22):2444-9 - PubMed
  14. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Mar 15;20(6):650-3 - PubMed
  15. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000 Apr;55(4):M221-31 - PubMed
  16. Arthritis Rheum. 1995 Sep;38(9):1236-41 - PubMed
  17. Spinal Cord. 2014 Oct;52(10):744-8 - PubMed
  18. Physiotherapy. 2013 Mar;99(1):12-20 - PubMed
  19. Clin J Pain. 1996 Dec;12(4):301-10 - PubMed
  20. J Rehabil Med. 2014 Nov;46(10):1046-9 - PubMed
  21. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Oct 12;11:233 - PubMed
  22. Clin J Pain. 2012 Oct;28(8):693-9 - PubMed
  23. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Dec 15;20(24):2746-9 - PubMed
  24. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 May 1;37(10):E609-16 - PubMed
  25. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Feb 1;37(3):207-13 - PubMed
  26. Skeletal Radiol. 2000 Apr;29(4):217-23 - PubMed
  27. Spine J. 2012 Feb;12(2):101-9 - PubMed
  28. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012 Oct;20(10 ):1103-8 - PubMed
  29. Spine J. 2009 Jul;9(7):545-50 - PubMed
  30. Spine J. 2015 Oct 1;15(10):2132-41 - PubMed

Publication Types