Display options
Share it on

J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Jul;10(7):ZC90-4. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/20543.8207. Epub 2016 Jul 01.

Knowledge and Attitude among General Dental Practitioners towards Minimally Invasive Dentistry in Riyadh and AlKharj.

Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR

Altaf Hussain Shah, Faisal Mohammed Sheddi, Mesfer Saad Alharqan, Shabnam Gulzar Khawja, Fahim Vohra, Zohaib Akram, Asmaa Ahmed Faden, Hesham Saleh Khalil

Affiliations

  1. Associate Professor, Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Dar Al Uloom University , Riyadh, Saudi Arabia .
  2. Dental Supervisor of Public Health at Qunfudah region, Previous Demonstrator College of Dentistry, Dar Al Uloom University , Riyadh .
  3. Dentist, Armed Forces Medical Services , AlJubail, Saudi Arabia .
  4. Post graduate student, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Darshan Dental College and Hospital , Loyara, Rajasthan, India .
  5. Associate Professor, Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University , Riyadh, Saudi Arabia .
  6. Senior Lecturer, Department of Periodontology, Ziauddin College of Dentistry, Ziauddin University , Karachi, Pakistan .
  7. Associate Professor, Department of Oral Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University , Riyadh, Saudi Arabia .
  8. Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, King Saud University , Riyadh, Saudi Arabia .

PMID: 27630962 PMCID: PMC5020192 DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/20543.8207

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Minimally Invasive Dentistry (MID) emphasizes conservative caries management strategies resulting in less destruction of tooth structure, a deviation of the traditional GV Black's restorative principles. However, there seems to be either deficiency in knowledge or little intention by general dental practitioners to adopt these principles.

AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the knowledge and attitude among general dental practitioners towards minimally invasive dentistry in Riyadh and AlKharj cities of Saudi Arabia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Self-administered structured questionnaires were handed to general dental practitioners (GDPs) in the cities of Riyadh and AlKharj in Saudi Arabia. Several questions, including Likert-type scale response categories (1-5), were used. The questions assessed the respondents' levels of agreement regarding diagnostic, preventive and restorative techniques such as use of caries risk assessment, use of high fluoride tooth paste, Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and tunnel preparations.

RESULTS: Out of 200 respondents, 161 GDPs with overall response rate of 80.5% completed the questionnaires. The GDPs showed significantly different approach with regards to the use of sharp explorer for caries detection (p = 0.014). Almost 60% of the participants had received no special education regarding minimally invasive procedures. Moreover, GDPs who had received MID training showed significantly better knowledge and attitude in adopting minimally invasive techniques for both diagnosis and treatment of dental caries.

CONCLUSION: Although GDPs possess knowledge about the benefits of MID; however, study showed deficiencies in their attitudes towards caries detection methods and application of minimally invasive dentistry procedures.

Keywords: Caries detection; Caries risk assessment; Fluoride; Remineralization

References

  1. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2004;2(4):389-96 - PubMed
  2. Dent Clin North Am. 2002 Apr;46(2):171-84, v - PubMed
  3. Dent Clin North Am. 2010 Jul;54(3):541-9 - PubMed
  4. Aust Dent J. 2013 Jun;58 Suppl 1:3-16 - PubMed
  5. Saudi Med J. 2013 Jul;34(7):744-9 - PubMed
  6. Am J Dent. 2004 Aug;17 (4):253-6 - PubMed
  7. Int Dent J. 2000 Feb;50(1):1-12 - PubMed
  8. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011 Jun;142(6):612-20 - PubMed
  9. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2007 Mar;28(3):130-4; quiz 135, 152 - PubMed
  10. Materials (Basel). 2010 Mar;3(3):1674-1691 - PubMed
  11. Aust Dent J. 2013 Jun;58 Suppl 1:26-34 - PubMed
  12. Prim Dent J. 2013 Jul;2(3):30-7 - PubMed
  13. J Dent. 2015 Dec;43(12):1559-64 - PubMed
  14. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003 Jan;134(1):87-95 - PubMed
  15. J Dent. 2009 Nov;37(11):827-34 - PubMed
  16. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 11;(7):CD002279 - PubMed
  17. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(4):CD002782 - PubMed
  18. Br Dent J. 2013 Jan;214(1):11-8 - PubMed
  19. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 Sep;137(9):1304-12 - PubMed
  20. Mil Med. 2010 Feb;175(2):115-21 - PubMed
  21. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 Mar;139(3):257-68 - PubMed
  22. Int Dent J. 2012 Oct;62(5):223-43 - PubMed
  23. Quintessence Int. 2000 Sep;31(8):527-33 - PubMed
  24. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 Sep;137(9):1231-9 - PubMed
  25. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006 May 01;7(2):46-54 - PubMed
  26. J Adhes Dent. 2001 Spring;3(1):17-31 - PubMed
  27. Int J Dent. 2010;2010:270729 - PubMed
  28. J Dent Educ. 2001 Oct;65(10):972-8 - PubMed
  29. Br J Radiol. 2009 Jan;82(973):1-12 - PubMed
  30. Aust Dent J. 2013 Jun;58 Suppl 1:40-59 - PubMed

Publication Types