Display options
Share it on

Iperception. 2016 Aug 17;7(4):2041669516661900. doi: 10.1177/2041669516661900. eCollection 2016.

The Perceived Size and Shape of Objects in Peripheral Vision.

i-Perception

Joseph Baldwin, Alistair Burleigh, Robert Pepperell, Nicole Ruta

Affiliations

  1. School of Art & Design, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK.

PMID: 27698981 PMCID: PMC5030758 DOI: 10.1177/2041669516661900

Abstract

Little is known about how we perceive the size and shape of objects in far peripheral vision. Observations made during an artistic study of visual space suggest that objects appear smaller and compressed in the periphery compared with central vision. To test this, we conducted three experiments. In Experiment 1, we asked participants to draw how a set of peripheral discs appeared when viewed peripherally without time or eye movement constraints. In Experiment 2, we used the method of constant stimuli to measure when a briefly presented peripheral stimulus appeared bigger or smaller compared with a central fixated one. In Experiment 3, we measured how accurate participants were in discriminating shapes presented briefly in the periphery. In Experiment 1, the peripheral discs were reported as appearing significantly smaller than the central disc, and as having an elliptical or polygonal contour. In Experiment 2, participants judged the size of peripheral discs as being significantly smaller when compared with the central disc across most of the peripheral field, and in Experiment 3, participants were quite accurate in reporting the shape of the peripheral object, except in the far periphery. Our results show that objects in the visual periphery are perceived as diminished in size when presented for long and brief exposures, suggesting diminution is an intrinsic feature of the structure of the visual space. Shape distortions, however, are reported only with longer exposures.

Keywords: art; peripheral vision; shape perception; size perception; visual space

References

  1. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2014 Jun;20(2):147-57 - PubMed
  2. Psychol Sci. 2006 Aug;17(8):645-8 - PubMed
  3. Science. 2009 Apr 17;324(5925):403-6 - PubMed
  4. Curr Biol. 2016 Jan 11;26(1):59-63 - PubMed
  5. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1984;4(2):123-31 - PubMed
  6. Vision Res. 2004 Jan;44(2):147-56 - PubMed
  7. Iperception. 2014 Oct 16;5(6):536-47 - PubMed
  8. Br J Ophthalmol. 1974 Aug;58(8):709-14 - PubMed
  9. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1996 Feb;22(1):233-43 - PubMed
  10. Perception. 1998;27(7):817-25 - PubMed
  11. Nat Neurosci. 2011 Jan;14(1):28-30 - PubMed
  12. J Vis. 2011 Dec 01;11(5):13 - PubMed
  13. Iperception. 2014 May 06;5(2):101-19 - PubMed
  14. J Neurosci Methods. 2007 May 15;162(1-2):8-13 - PubMed
  15. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2011 Mar;2(2):222-30 - PubMed
  16. Iperception. 2015 Jan 06;6(1):5-14 - PubMed
  17. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1997 Jun;23(3):609-21 - PubMed
  18. J Gen Psychol. 1980 Oct;103(2d Half):227-32 - PubMed
  19. Percept Mot Skills. 2008 Aug;107(1):273-87 - PubMed
  20. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Jan 12;9:712 - PubMed
  21. Psychol Sci. 2012 Feb;23(2):126-32 - PubMed
  22. J Vis. 2010 Dec 16;10(14):15 - PubMed
  23. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2003 Nov;114(3):355-78 - PubMed
  24. Percept Psychophys. 2005 Aug;67(6):997-1009 - PubMed
  25. Perception. 2014;43(5):395-416 - PubMed
  26. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Oct;31(5):996-1003 - PubMed
  27. Perception. 1978;7(2):215-23 - PubMed
  28. Perception. 2011;40(6):649-55 - PubMed

Publication Types