Display options
Share it on

Parent Sci Pract. 2016;16(3):206-218. doi: 10.1080/15295192.2016.1158604. Epub 2016 Apr 27.

The Role of Negative Affect and Physiological Regulation in maternal attribution.

Parenting, science and practice

Zhe Wang, Kirby Deater-Deckard, Martha Ann Bell

Affiliations

  1. Virginia Tech.
  2. Department of Psychology, Virginia Tech, 109 Williams Hall (0436), Blacksburg, VA, 24061.

PMID: 27667969 PMCID: PMC5032649 DOI: 10.1080/15295192.2016.1158604

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Mothers who attribute child misbehaviors to children's intentions, and not to situational causes, show more hostile parenting behaviors. Why are some mothers more likely than others to make more hostile attributions (i.e., high intentional attributions and low situational attributions) when confronted with child challenging behaviors? We examined the relation between mothers' perception of child challenging behaviors and their hostile attributions of child misbehaviors, with an emphasis on how maternal negative affect and resting vagal activity moderated this relation.

DESIGN: 160 mothers of 3- to 7-year-old children reported their perceptions of child problem behaviors, their attributions regarding child misbehaviors, and their temperamental negative affect. Mothers' respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) was measured during resting state.

RESULTS: Maternal perceptions of child challenging behaviors were positively related to hostile maternal attributions, and this relation was strongest in mothers with high negative affect and low resting RSA.

CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate the importance of considering mothers' affective and physiological attributes when examining social-cognitive processes in parenting.

Keywords: RSA; attribution; negative affect; parenting; perception of challenging child behaviors

References

  1. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993 Jan;64(1):94-103 - PubMed
  2. Emotion. 2008 Aug;8(4):458-67 - PubMed
  3. Psychol Bull. 2015 May;141(3):602-54 - PubMed
  4. Psychol Rev. 1995 Apr;102(2):246-68 - PubMed
  5. Child Dev. 2002 May-Jun;73(3):916-34 - PubMed
  6. Emotion. 2003 Dec;3(4):378-93 - PubMed
  7. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1997 Jul;38(5):581-6 - PubMed
  8. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 Nov;73(5):1107-17 - PubMed
  9. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1994;59(2-3):167-86 - PubMed
  10. Annu Rev Psychol. 1984;35:427-59 - PubMed
  11. Dev Psychol. 2005 Jan;41(1):30-41 - PubMed
  12. Cogn Emot. 2016;30(3):444-57 - PubMed
  13. Psychol Sci. 2010 Jan;21(1):75-9 - PubMed
  14. Psychophysiology. 1990 Nov;27(6):702-14 - PubMed
  15. J Pers. 2004 Dec;72(6):1105-32 - PubMed
  16. J Adolesc. 2013 Dec;36(6):1093-101 - PubMed
  17. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2003 Feb;44(2):242-54 - PubMed
  18. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2008 Jun;33(5):643-53 - PubMed
  19. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012 Oct;53(10):1084-91 - PubMed
  20. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Dec;55(6):958-66 - PubMed
  21. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2007 Aug;35(4):594-604 - PubMed
  22. Child Abuse Negl. 2003 Jan;27(1):21-45 - PubMed
  23. Child Dev. 1999 Jul-Aug;70(4):896-909 - PubMed
  24. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Sep;79(3):344-54 - PubMed
  25. Biol Psychol. 2010 Jul;84(3):488-96 - PubMed
  26. Dev Rev. 2015 Jun 1;36:1-14 - PubMed
  27. Pers Individ Dif. 2007 May;42(7):1221-1231 - PubMed
  28. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Feb;77(1):189-95 - PubMed
  29. Psychophysiology. 1993 Mar;30(2):183-96 - PubMed
  30. Dev Rev. 2015 Jun 1;36:105-126 - PubMed
  31. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012 Feb;36(2):747-56 - PubMed
  32. J Gen Psychol. 1995 Jan;122(1):29-35 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support