Display options
Share it on

F1000Res. 2016 Aug 31;5. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.8365.1. eCollection 2016.

Recent advances in synthetic biosafety.

F1000Research

Anna J Simon, Andrew D Ellington

Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.

PMID: 27635235 PMCID: PMC5007755 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.8365.1

Abstract

Synthetically engineered organisms hold promise for a broad range of medical, environmental, and industrial applications. Organisms can potentially be designed, for example, for the inexpensive and environmentally benign synthesis of pharmaceuticals and industrial chemicals, for the cleanup of environmental pollutants, and potentially even for biomedical applications such as the targeting of specific diseases or tissues. However, the use of synthetically engineered organisms comes with several reasonable safety concerns, one of which is that the organisms or their genes could escape their intended habitats and cause environmental disruption. Here we review key recent developments in this emerging field of synthetic biocontainment and discuss further developments that might be necessary for the widespread use of synthetic organisms. Specifically, we discuss the history and modern development of three strategies for the containment of synthetic microbes: addiction to an exogenously supplied ligand; self-killing outside of a designated environment; and self-destroying encoded DNA circuitry outside of a designated environment.

Keywords: applied microbiology; engineered microbe; synthetic organism

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared that they had no competing interests. No competing interests were disclosed. No competing interests were disclosed.

References

  1. J Am Chem Soc. 2009 Oct 21;131(41):14620-1 - PubMed
  2. Environ Biosafety Res. 2007 Jan-Jun;6(1-2):37-53 - PubMed
  3. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012 Jan 23;10(3):191-202 - PubMed
  4. ACS Synth Biol. 2016 Nov 18;5(11):1220-1230 - PubMed
  5. Nature. 2015 Feb 5;518(7537):89-93 - PubMed
  6. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Feb 18;43(3):1945-54 - PubMed
  7. Nat Biotechnol. 2014 Nov;32(11):1141-5 - PubMed
  8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Feb 18;94(4):1059-63 - PubMed
  9. Environ Microbiol. 2000 Oct;2(5):555-63 - PubMed
  10. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994 Oct;60(10):3746-51 - PubMed
  11. ACS Synth Biol. 2015 Mar 20;4(3):307-16 - PubMed
  12. Nat Biotechnol. 2015 Dec;33(12):1250-1255 - PubMed
  13. Lab Chip. 2012 Jun 21;12(12):2165-74 - PubMed
  14. Nat Chem Biol. 2016 Mar;12(3):138-40 - PubMed
  15. Nat Chem Biol. 2016 Feb;12(2):82-6 - PubMed
  16. ACS Synth Biol. 2012 Nov 16;1(11):555-64 - PubMed
  17. J Org Chem. 2014 Apr 4;79(7):3194-9 - PubMed
  18. J Am Chem Soc. 2009 Mar 11;131(9):3246-52 - PubMed
  19. ACS Synth Biol. 2013 Jun 21;2(6):301-7 - PubMed
  20. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 May;57(5):1504-8 - PubMed
  21. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Feb;37(2):e14 - PubMed
  22. Chem Rev. 2014 May 14;114(9):4764-806 - PubMed
  23. Nature. 2015 Feb 5;518(7537):55-60 - PubMed
  24. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1993;47:139-66 - PubMed
  25. Nat Commun. 2015 May 19;6:6989 - PubMed
  26. Science. 2000 Jun 16;288(5473):2042-5 - PubMed
  27. J Am Chem Soc. 2008 Feb 20;130(7):2336-43 - PubMed
  28. Science. 2013 Oct 18;342(6156):357-60 - PubMed
  29. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Mar;40(6):2793-806 - PubMed
  30. Annu Rev Genet. 2011;45:61-79 - PubMed
  31. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(21):6095-101 - PubMed
  32. J Am Chem Soc. 2011 Sep 28;133(38):15105-12 - PubMed
  33. Nature. 2014 May 15;509(7500):385-8 - PubMed
  34. ACS Synth Biol. 2015 Dec 18;4(12):1279-86 - PubMed
  35. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2011 Jul 25;50(31):7109-14 - PubMed
  36. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2015 Aug 21;3:120 - PubMed
  37. J Am Chem Soc. 2009 Apr 15;131(14):5046-7 - PubMed

Publication Types