Display options
Share it on

J Robot Surg. 2012 Sep;6(3):207-12. doi: 10.1007/s11701-011-0292-5. Epub 2011 Jul 08.

Robotic adrenalectomy by an open surgeon: are outcomes different?.

Journal of robotic surgery

Shankar R Raman, Emil Shakov, Nino Carnevale, Anusak Yiengpruksawan

Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center, 1770 Grand Concourse #12L, Bronx, NY, 10457, USA. [email protected].
  2. Department of Surgery, The Valley Institute for Robotic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Ridgewood, NJ, USA.

PMID: 27638273 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-011-0292-5

Abstract

Our objective is to demonstrate the feasibility of robotic adrenalectomy by a traditional open surgeon using the da Vinci Robotic Surgical System and to analyze our outcomes. All patients who underwent robotic adrenalectomy by a single surgeon from July 2001 to April 2011 were included in the study. Vascular inflow control was obtained early on to facilitate dissection and handling of the adrenal gland. Forty adrenalectomies were performed during the study period in 39 patients (15 males; 25 left sided; 1 bilateral). Four patients underwent conversion to complete the procedure. The mean tumor size was 6.97 ± 2.4 cm. The mean operating room (OR) time was 117 ± 50.4 min. Comparing the OR time between da Vinci and da Vinci S robotic systems showed that the OR time was significantly less (169 ± 46 vs. 94.25 ± 32 min; P = 0.002) while blood loss, length of stay, size and weight were not different. The mean length of stay was 3 days. There were no mortalities in our study. Benign neoplasms formed a majority of the tumors removed. Robotic adrenalectomy is an option for surgeons without extensive training in advanced laparoscopic techniques provided they have adequate open experience.

Keywords: Adrenal gland diseases; Adrenalectomy; Humans; Robotics; Robotics: methods; Treatment outcome

References

  1. Surgery. 2005 Dec;138(6):1078-85; discussion 1085-6 - PubMed
  2. Surg Endosc. 2005 Jan;19(1):117-9 - PubMed
  3. Curr Opin Urol. 2009 Jan;19(1):89-96 - PubMed
  4. Arch Surg. 2010 Aug;145(8):781-4 - PubMed
  5. Surg Endosc. 2006 Jan;20(1):119-24 - PubMed
  6. Am J Surg. 2008 Apr;195(4):433-8 - PubMed
  7. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2001 Dec;11(6):415-9 - PubMed
  8. Ann Surg. 1997 Sep;226(3):238-46; discussion 246-7 - PubMed
  9. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2004 Feb;14(1):38-41 - PubMed
  10. Surg Endosc. 2008 Feb;22(2):463-6 - PubMed
  11. Surg Endosc. 2001 Nov;15(11):1356-8 - PubMed
  12. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006 Sep;20(3):483-99 - PubMed
  13. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003 Dec;10(10):1191-6 - PubMed
  14. Surg Endosc. 2004 Dec;18(12):1742-6 - PubMed
  15. Surgery. 2008 Dec;144(6):995-1001; discussion 1001 - PubMed
  16. J Urol. 2005 Feb;173(2):519-25 - PubMed
  17. J Urol. 2000 Dec;164(6):2082-5 - PubMed
  18. World J Surg. 2004 Nov;28(11):1180-5 - PubMed
  19. J Endourol. 2010 Apr;24(4):571-5 - PubMed
  20. Ann Chir. 2003 Oct;128(8):530-5 - PubMed
  21. Chir Ital. 2003 May-Jun;55(3):321-31 - PubMed
  22. J Urol. 2009 Sep;182(3):866-72 - PubMed
  23. Am J Surg. 2005 Apr;189(4):405-11 - PubMed
  24. Surg Endosc. 2004 May;18(5):771-3 - PubMed

Publication Types