Display options
Share it on

PeerJ. 2016 Sep 15;4:e2447. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2447. eCollection 2016.

Muscle size explains low passive skeletal muscle force in heart failure patients.

PeerJ

Fausto Antonio Panizzolo, Andrew J Maiorana, Louise H Naylor, Lawrence G Dembo, David G Lloyd, Daniel J Green, Jonas Rubenson

Affiliations

  1. John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States; The School of Sport Science, Exercise and Health, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.
  2. Advanced Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplant Service, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia; School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
  3. The School of Sport Science, Exercise and Health, The University of Western Australia , Crawley , WA , Australia.
  4. Envision Medical Imaging , Perth , WA , Australia.
  5. Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University , Gold Coast , QLD , Australia.
  6. The School of Sport Science, Exercise and Health, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia; Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Science, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
  7. The School of Sport Science, Exercise and Health, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia; Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.

PMID: 27672504 PMCID: PMC5028761 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2447

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alterations in skeletal muscle function and architecture have been linked to the compromised exercise capacity characterizing chronic heart failure (CHF). However, how passive skeletal muscle force is affected in CHF is not clear. Understanding passive force characteristics in CHF can help further elucidate the extent to which altered contractile properties and/or architecture might affect muscle and locomotor function. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate passive force in a single muscle for which non-invasive measures of muscle size and estimates of fiber force are possible, the soleus (SOL), both in CHF patients and age- and physical activity-matched control participants.

METHODS: Passive SOL muscle force and size were obtained by means of a novel approach combining experimental data (dynamometry, electromyography, ultrasound imaging) with a musculoskeletal model.

RESULTS: We found reduced passive SOL forces (∼30%) (at the same relative levels of muscle stretch) in CHF vs. healthy individuals. This difference was eliminated when force was normalized by physiological cross sectional area, indicating that reduced force output may be most strongly associated with muscle size. Nevertheless, passive force was significantly higher in CHF at a given absolute muscle length (non length-normalized) and likely explained by the shorter muscle slack lengths and optimal muscle lengths measured in CHF compared to the control participants. This later factor may lead to altered performance of the SOL in functional tasks such gait.

DISCUSSION: These findings suggest introducing exercise rehabilitation targeting muscle hypertrophy and, specifically for the calf muscles, exercise that promotes muscle lengthening.

Keywords: Heart failure; Passive force; Skeletal muscle; Soleus; Ultrasound

Conflict of interest statement

Lawrence G. Dembo is an employee of Envision Medical Imaging. The authors declare there are no competing interests.

References

  1. J Card Fail. 1998 Jun;4(2):97-104 - PubMed
  2. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Dec;126(12):2320-9 - PubMed
  3. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000 May;88(5):1565-70 - PubMed
  4. Circulation. 2002 Sep 10;106(11):1384-9 - PubMed
  5. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2016 Jan;44(1):45-50 - PubMed
  6. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1985 Sep;10(3):141-6 - PubMed
  7. J Appl Biomech. 2010 May;26(2):224-8 - PubMed
  8. J Biomech. 2009 Sep 18;42(13):2011-6 - PubMed
  9. J Biomech. 2014 Nov 28;47(15):3719-25 - PubMed
  10. Eur Heart J. 1999 May;20(9):683-93 - PubMed
  11. Pflugers Arch. 2011 Jul;462(1):155-63 - PubMed
  12. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2010 Oct;14(4):411-7 - PubMed
  13. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Dec;30(7):1758-64 - PubMed
  14. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 Mar;47(3):498-508 - PubMed
  15. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2000 Jun;10(3):189-96 - PubMed
  16. J Exp Biol. 2012 Oct 15;215(Pt 20):3539-51 - PubMed
  17. Proc Biol Sci. 2010 May 22;277(1687):1523-30 - PubMed
  18. Gait Posture. 2008 May;27(4):628-34 - PubMed
  19. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003 Oct;95(4):1648-55 - PubMed
  20. J Biomech. 2011 Jan 4;44(1):109-15 - PubMed
  21. Int J Cardiol. 2006 May 10;109(2):179-87 - PubMed
  22. Br Heart J. 1995 Oct;74(4):381-5 - PubMed
  23. Int J Cardiol. 2010 Sep 3;143(3):276-82 - PubMed
  24. Acta Physiol Scand. 2001 Aug;172(4):279-85 - PubMed
  25. J Biomech. 2009 May 11;42(7):850-6 - PubMed
  26. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2012 Aug 15;113(4):517-23 - PubMed
  27. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010;2010:575672 - PubMed
  28. Circulation. 1992 Apr;85(4):1364-73 - PubMed
  29. Int J Cardiol. 2010 Jun 11;141(3):275-83 - PubMed
  30. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1993 Jul;75(1):373-81 - PubMed
  31. J Biomech. 2007;40(12):2628-35 - PubMed
  32. Eur Heart J. 2013 Feb;34(7):512-9 - PubMed
  33. J Biomech. 2003 Aug;36(8):1159-68 - PubMed
  34. Ann Biomed Eng. 2010 Feb;38(2):269-79 - PubMed
  35. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1999 May;86(5):1445-57 - PubMed
  36. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007 Nov;54(11):1940-50 - PubMed
  37. J Physiol. 1998 Aug 1;510 ( Pt 3):977-85 - PubMed
  38. Foot Ankle Int. 2006 Jun;27(6):414-7 - PubMed
  39. Am J Cardiol. 1994 Feb 1;73(4):307-9 - PubMed
  40. Gait Posture. 2013 Sep;38(4):764-9 - PubMed
  41. Eur Heart J. 1994 Jun;15(6):801-9 - PubMed

Publication Types