Display options
Share it on

Physiother Can. 2016;68(1):15-22. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2014-62.

Validity of the Handheld Dynamometer Compared with an Isokinetic Dynamometer in Measuring Peak Hip Extension Strength.

Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada

Heather Keep, Levana Luu, Ayli Berson, S Jayne Garland

Affiliations

  1. Neural Control of Force Production Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.

PMID: 27504043 PMCID: PMC4961312 DOI: 10.3138/ptc.2014-62

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether the handheld dynamometer (HHD) is an appropriate tool to assess and quantify peak hip extension strength in prone standing position by (1) evaluating the concurrent validity of the HHD versus an isokinetic dynamometer (IKD), (2) establishing the minimal detectable change (MDC), and (3) determining the validity of single-trial versus multi-trial measures.

METHOD: A convenience sample of 20 healthy adults was recruited for this cross-sectional study. Measures of peak hip extension strength were collected in prone standing position with both the HHD and the IKD and in supine position with the IKD.

RESULTS: Values of r were 0.37 for HHD versus IKD prone standing and 0.51 for HHD versus IKD supine. MDC was 14.8 Nm for the HHD, 25.6 Nm for IKD prone standing, and 41.5 Nm for IKD supine. High correlations (r values of 0.92-0.94) were observed between trial 1 and the mean of three trials.

CONCLUSIONS: The HHD has moderate concurrent validity in measuring peak hip extension strength in the prone standing position in healthy adults. MDC for hip extension strength was lowest using the HHD. Single-trial values showed a high correlation with three-trial mean values.

Keywords: hip; isometric contraction; muscle strength dynamometer; reproducibility of results

References

  1. Clin J Sport Med. 2000 Apr;10(2):89-97 - PubMed
  2. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Mar;78(3):251-5 - PubMed
  3. Am J Occup Ther. 2009 Mar-Apr;63(2):193-7 - PubMed
  4. J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Mar;24(3):815-24 - PubMed
  5. J Sport Rehabil. 2008 May;17(2):160-70 - PubMed
  6. Acta Orthop. 2007 Aug;78(4):505-10 - PubMed
  7. Gerontology. 2006;52(3):154-9 - PubMed
  8. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004 Jan;91(1):22-9 - PubMed
  9. J Rehabil Med. 2011 Sep;43(9):808-11 - PubMed
  10. PM R. 2011 May;3(5):472-9 - PubMed
  11. Phys Ther. 1983 Oct;63(10):1597-605 - PubMed
  12. J Strength Cond Res. 2006 May;20(2):262-7 - PubMed
  13. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Aug;85(8):1345-50 - PubMed
  14. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010 Jun;20(3):493-501 - PubMed
  15. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974 Dec;56(8):1592-7 - PubMed
  16. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2009 Mar;25(3):126-32 - PubMed
  17. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1996 Sep;24(3):154-9 - PubMed
  18. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1969 May;50(5):241-50 - PubMed
  19. Arthritis Rheum. 2009 May 15;61(5):633-40 - PubMed
  20. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Dec;86(12):2371-6 - PubMed
  21. BMC Pediatr. 2011 May 25;11:42 - PubMed
  22. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1994 Dec;20(6):296-301 - PubMed
  23. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Jun;83(6):811-5 - PubMed
  24. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Mar;21(3):550-5 - PubMed
  25. J Man Manip Ther. 2011 Feb;19(1):5-10 - PubMed

Publication Types